Mitt Romney and his five political lives

The man who once disparaged Jesse Helms and bragged about voting for a Democrat is reinventing himself -- again

Topics: Mitt Romney, War Room,

Mitt Romney and his five political lives

Mitt Romney used a speech in New Hampshire over the weekend to unveil the basic message he plans to build his presidential candidacy around. With his opponents poised to torment him with reminders of the Obama-style healthcare plan he implemented as governor of Massachusetts and with religious conservatives still unconvinced that he’s truly one of them, Romney will apparently present himself as the jobs candidate.

This is, according to NBC’s First Read, the third different version of Romney to grace the political stage:

Romney 1.0 was the socially moderate businessman who won election as Massachusetts governor in 2002. Romney 2.0 was the socially conservative presidential candidate who ran to John McCain’s and Rudy Giuliani’s right on abortion, stem cells, and illegal immigration in 2007-2008. And Romney 3.0 appears to be the repeat presidential candidate who will focus more on the economy and his business record than on social issues

Actually, that’s not quite right. If you examine his past closely, this is actually Mitt’s fifth political incarnation — at least. Here’s a handy guide:

Mitt 1.0 (1993-1999)

Even though Ted Kennedy’s poll numbers are unusually shaky (thanks to the rape trial saga of his nephew, William Kennedy Smith), Massachusetts Republicans struggle to find a credible challenger for the 1994 campaign. With their two top options — Gov. William Weld and state Treasurer Joe Malone — ruling it out, Romney seizes the void and announces his candidacy in November 1993. At roughly the same time, he changes his party registration from “independent” to “Republican.”

Romney runs as a carbon copy of the culturally liberal Weld. He promises a gay rights group that he will do more to promote their cause than Kennedy and he repeatedly declares his support for legal abortion. Actually, he does much more than that: During a televised debate with Kennedy, Romney invokes the story of “a dear close family relative that was very close to me that passed away from an illegal abortion.” This experience, he says, is the foundation for his belief that ” we can believe as we want but that we cannot impose our beliefs on others. And you will not see me waver on that.”

Romney also disparages Jesse Helms and distances himself from Ronald Reagan — whose reputation, especially in Massachusetts, had fallen into disrepute in the early 1990s — reminding voters that he wasn’t even a registered Republican when the Gipper was president. And he plays up his decision to vote for Democrat Paul Tsongas in the 1992 presidential primaries. (By ’94, Tsongas was the most popular political figure in Massachusetts.) When Tsongas endorses Kennedy, the conservative Boston Herald editorializes:

And – if such truths can ever be acknowledged in politics – the truth is that Tsongas has far more in common with Kennedy’s Republican challenger Mitt Romney. (Romney has already acknowledged crossing over to the Democratic presidential primary in 1992 to cast a vote for Tsongas. It is a statement he makes with no apologies and with a certain degree of pride.)

Mitt 2.0 (1999- late 2001)

After failing to unseat Kennedy, Romney briefly mulls a follow-up campaign in 1996 against John Kerry, then passes when Weld decides to run himself. His political options in Massachusetts closed for the foreseeable future, Romney heads to Utah in early 1999 to take charge of the beleaguered Salt Lake Olympic Organizing Committee.

The reviews for his work are favorable — so much that Romney explores relaunching his political career in the Beehive State. The only realistic target, he quickly discovers, is the governorship, which is due to open up in 2004, two years after the Olympics. But to even have a chance, he’ll have to distance himself from the liberal cultural positions he staked out in Massachusetts. Utah is a more conservative state to begin with, and GOP nominations are generally settled at a state convention dominated by the hardest of the hard-liners. So when the Salt Lake Tribune writes about Romney’s potential abortion baggage in the summer of 2001, the chairman of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee responds with a letter in which he states: “I do not wish to be labeled pro-choice.” 

Mitt 3.0 (late 2001-2004)

Romney makes no other political noise in Utah, mostly because an unexpected opportunity back in Massachusetts presents itself.

Romney had been operating under the assumption that Republican Jane Swift, the acting governor of Massachusetts (who was elevated to the post in early ’01 when Paul Cellucci left to become ambassador to Canada), would be the party’s unanimous choice for a full term in 2002. But by late 2001, it’s clear that Swift, through an endless parade of gaffes and missteps, is rapidly losing her party’s confidence — just as Romney is becoming something of a national hero for his Olympic stewardship. The Games go off without a hitch in February ’02, and almost as soon as they end, Romney returns to Belmont, Mass., and jumps into the governor’s race. Swift, who trails him by a stunning 63 points in one poll, backs down.

In the general election, Romney once again plays up his cultural liberalism, although his pronouncements aren’t as over-the-top as they were in ’94. (Perhaps his eyes are already on his next move after winning the governorship.) In a debate, he refuses to use the term “pro-choice,” but also refuses to call himself antiabortion. As governor, he promises, he’ll support and uphold abortion rights. The election is close, but Romney satisfies enough culturally liberal suburbanites (who otherwise like his reform agenda) that he’s not a zealot on social issues, and wins the race.

For the first two years of his term, Romney is an engaged governor pursuing a moderate, good government agenda. For instance, he picks the former president of the Conservation Law Foundation, Douglas Foy, to devise an environmentally-friendly “smart growth” plan for the state and (initially) backs Foy when he tries to organize a greenhouse gas emissions accord among several Northeast states. Romney also seeks to build the moribund state Republican Party, sinking massive money and effort into the 2004 elections, which feature an unusually deep roster of GOP state legislative candidates.

Mitt 4.0 (2004-2011)

The ’04 campaign is a total bust. Romney’s legislative candidates fall victim to the top-of-the-ticket unpopularity of George W. Bush (and Kerry’s status as the Democrats’ presidential nominee), and a ruling from the state’s Supreme Judicial Court legalizing gay marriage forces Romney to choose between his present political imperatives and his future national ambition. Essentially, he decides to give up on Massachusetts and begin positioning himself immediately for the 2008 GOP presidential nomination.

During the last two years of his term, Romney officially changes his position on abortion, assumes a leading national role as a gay marriage opponent, and begins belittling Massachusetts and its liberal reputation to out-of-state Republican audiences. In 2006 alone, he spends 212 days out of Massachusetts, racking up more than 200,000 miles in the air and making stops in nearly 40 states. He almost completely disengages from Massachusetts politics, although he does use his office to make symbolic goodwill gestures to national conservatives (for instance, an executive order deputizing State Police officers to round up illegal immigrants). The one exception to his disengagement: enactment and signing of the state’s healthcare reform law in 2006. It’s supposed to be one of Romney’s main presidential selling points (who knew?) and he makes sure a representative of the Heritage Foundation is on hand for the lavish signing ceremony, lest any national conservatives wonder if an individual mandate is ideologically kosher.

On the campaign trail, Romney is frequently confronted with reminders of the liberal views he once espoused in Massachusetts. His sincerity is challenged. He pretends that he hasn’t changes many views, besides his evolution on abortion. For instance, he takes to claiming that his ’92 vote for Tsongas actually represented an act of mischief-making by a strategically savvy Republican partisan:

“Romney confirmed he voted for former U.S. Sen. Paul Tsongas in the state’s 1992 Democratic presidential primary, saying he did so both because Tsongas was from Massachusetts and because he favored his ideas over those of Bill Clinton,” the Boston Globe’s Scot Lehigh and Frank Phillips wrote on Feb. 3, 1994. “He added he had been sure the G.O.P. would renominate George Bush, for whom he voted in the fall election.”

It’s just one of the utterly ridiculous cover stories Romney offers for the words and actions of Romney 1.0. A surprising number of conservatives rally to him anyway — although not enough to capture the GOP nomination. And while he begins running for 2012 immediately after ending his ’08 candidacy, it becomes clear after President Obama pushes his healthcare bill through Congress that Romney’s signature achievement in Massachusetts could haunt him in the ’12 primaries. Another reboot is in order.

Mitt 5.0 (2011-?): Jobs!

Steve Kornacki

Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>