Why Mitch Daniels is the Republican to watch for ’12
The GOP field is dull and littered with birthers and religious fanatics: There's an opening for Mitch Daniels
Topics: 2012 Elections, War Room, Republican Party, Politics News
FILE - In this Feb. 11, 2011 file photo, Indiana Gov Mitch Daniels speaks in Washington. With a wary eye on Wisconsin, Republican leaders in several states are toning down the tough talk against public-employee unions and even abandoning union-limiting measures altogether. Indiana's governor urges GOP lawmakers to give up a right-to-work bill for fear the backlash could derail the rest of his agenda; Ohio senators plan to soften a bill that would have banned collective bargaining, and the Michigan governor says he'd rather negotiate than "pick fights." (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)(Credit: Jose Luis Magana)To look at the Republican presidential field from afar is to conclude that — of all people — the governor of Indiana would be well-positioned to win the nomination, should he decide to run.
Yes, trying to predict the electoral outcomes a year ahead of time can be a fool’s errand, but it’s not hard to see the opening for Mitch Daniels: The GOP field is deeply flawed — the most prominent “candidate” at the moment seems to be a reality show host who’s become obsessed with birtherism — and deathly stale, littered with dried-out pols. Daniels, by contrast, would be a genuinely fresh face on the national stage and would combine the appeal of an outsider — he was overwhelmingly reelected in Indiana in 2008, even as President Obama carried the state — with the savvy of a D.C. insider (which he was during the first part of George W. Bush’s administration).
Daniels has been coy about his intentions so far, but his potential strength on the GOP side is made clear in part by a simple process of elimination.
Mitt Romney, the nominal GOP front-runner, may be President Obama’s strongest potential foe, but he has been on the national scene for nearly a decade and hasn’t been able to garner overwhelming intra-party support — even though he started running for the 2012 nomination as soon as his 2008 run fizzled. Romney’s anemic poll numbers among conservative voters speak to this. Mike Huckabee, Romney’s chief personal nemesis, has somewhat similar problems. He fared better than expected in 2008, but in the three years since then, he’s failed to establish a broad line of party support.
Parallel deficiencies plague the rest of the field. If a presidential “freshness test” exists, Newt Gingrich expired as a viable contender years ago — even before he became House speaker in 1995. Haley Barbour was only elected governor of Mississippi in 2003, but he’s had a long career on the national stage and has been well-known as a Republican operative since the Reagan years. Tim Pawlenty doesn’t suffer from the same freshness problems, but there’s little discernible enthusiasm for him among rank-and-file Republicans — despite his relentless efforts to create it. Perhaps he could slip through if others falter, but on his own legs, he’s a classic “Where’s the beef?” candidate.
Mark Greenbaum is a freelance writer in Washington. More Mark Greenbaum.




Koch Brother To Host A Fundraiser For Ken Cuccinelli
IRS Official Refuses To Testify During House Oversight Hearing
Comments
55 Comments