John Boehner’s debt ceiling blink
Who didn't see this coming? The Speaker of the House caves on a "grand bargain" budget deal
Topics: Budget Showdown, Debt ceiling, John Boehner, R-Ohio, How the World Works, Politics News
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, left, and President Barack Obama meet with congressional leaders in the Cabinet Room of the White House,Sunday, July 10, 2011, in Washington, to discuss the debt. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)(Credit: AP)John Boehner’s decision on Saturday to back away from the so-called grand bargain, in which Democrats and Republicans would agree to $4 trillion worth of spending cuts in return for $1 trillion in new revenue — possibly even including the end of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy — was obviously the biggest budget showdown news of the weekend.
But is there anyone inside or outside Washington who was surprised at this development, save perhaps NBC’s Chuck Todd, who was excitedly tweeting his belief last Friday that “there’s real momentum for a big deal”? The inevitability of a severe backlash from House Republicans against any such compromise was entirely predictable.
In fact, I predicted it, last Thursday:
Let’s step back here a second. Democrats are right to be alarmed at the prospect of big cuts to entitlements. But how do you suppose your average House Republican is reacting to the news of what would be, for all intents and purposes, a trillion dollar tax hike? I can’t imagine they’re very pleased, and I don’t see how Boehner can possibly keep his caucus together on this issue. It’s even more unrealistic to assume that ending the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy could be folded into this deal, as some reports are suggesting.
Obviously, Boehner couldn’t keep his caucus together. His knuckles got rapped. The New York Times reports that during Sunday evening’s summit meeting between Obama and congressional leaders, “Mr. Boehner appeared subdued at the meeting, officials said, letting the House majority leader, Eric Cantor of Virginia, do most of the talking. Mr. Cantor reiterated his opposition to a bigger deal.”
The current state of play, supposedly, is a return to the so-called Biden deal, which is believed to have identified around $2 trillion in cuts. But let’s not forget that the Biden deal also included a package of revenue increases that House Republicans objected to. In fact, Cantor quit the Biden negotiations and cited precisely the same explanation for his intransigence — anything that “raises” taxes, even if that just means closing loopholes or eliminating tax breaks, is unacceptable. Since Obama’s decision to “go big” was a response to the lack of progress on the smaller deal, I’m not sure I can see how the failure of the big deal makes the little deal any more viable.
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




No Evidence FBI Is Targeting Chechen Separatists In Boston Bombing Case, Advocates Say
Bill De Blasio Won't Be Distracted By Anthony Weiner
State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
Comments
69 Comments