A translation guide for nutty GOP debt ceiling rhetoric
What Mitch McConnell, Michele Bachmann, and John Boehner are saying -- and what they really mean
Topics: Budget Showdown, How the World Works, Debt ceiling, John Boehner, R-Ohio, Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Politics News
U.S. Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) listens during remarks about leadership elections on Capitol Hill in Washington, November 16, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS)(Credit: © Jim Young / Reuters)Call me crazy, but if we set aside the question of whether or not we agree with the massive concessions offered by President Obama to get a debt ceiling deal, it seems clear to me that he has made a real proposal: Big cuts in return for smaller tax increases. The Republican response, however, has been a little more difficult to interpret, because, on the surface, it just seems utterly disconnected from reality.
So here’s a little translation guide to help readers get some clarity.
What they say:
Michele Bachmann, explaining the only circumstances under which she would vote for raising the debt ceiling.
“They’d have to cut an enormous amount, including they would have to defund Obamacare,” she said on Fox News in response to a question about the circumstances under which she’d vote to raise the debt ceiling. “Because that’s the largest entitlement in the history of the country.”
What she means:
My solution to bringing down the budget deficit is to get rid of the only part of the social safety net that is (a) paid for and (b) projected by the Congressional Budget Office to actually reduce the deficit.
What they say:
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, explaining why there will be no “real solution” to the debt problem.
“After years of discussions and months of negotiations, I have little question that as long as this president is in the Oval Office a real solution is probably unattainable,” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said on the Senate floor.
What he means:
As long as the president of the United States — a Democratic politician who has already agreed in principle to bigger cuts in Medicare and Social Security than any previous Democratic occupant of the White House — as long as he continues to refuse to unilaterally give in to every single one of our demands, we will continue our policy, established on the very first day of his presidency, of opposing with all our force everything he does.
What they say:
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
House Democrats Dismiss Existence Of Obama Scandals
Comments
146 Comments