
Bush and Blair found guilty of war crimes for Iraq attack
A tribunal in Malaysia applies the Nuremberg Principles to brand the two leaders as war criminals
By Glenn GreenwaldTopics: Politics News
(updated below)
A tribunal in Malaysia, spearheaded by that nation’s former Prime Minister, yesterday found George Bush and Tony Blair guilty of “crimes against peace” and other war crimes for their 2003 aggressive attack on Iraq, as well as fabricating pretexts used to justify the attack. The seven-member Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal — which featured an American law professor as one of its chief prosecutors — has no formal enforcement power, but was modeled after a 1967 tribunal in Sweden and Denmark that found the U.S. guilty of a war of aggression in Vietnam, and, even more so, after the U.S.-led Nuremberg Tribunal held after World War II. Just as the U.S. steadfastly ignored the 1967 tribunal on Vietnam, Bush and Blair both ignored the summons sent to them and thus were tried in absentia.
The tribunal ruled that Bush and Blair’s name should be entered in a register of war criminals, urged that they be recognized as such under the Rome Statute, and will also petition the International Criminal Court to proceed with binding charges. Such efforts are likely to be futile, but one Malaysian lawyer explained the motives of the tribunal to The Associated Press: “For these people who have been immune from prosecution, we want to put them on trial in this forum to prove that they committed war crimes.” In other words, because their own nations refuse to hold them accountable and can use their power to prevent international bodies from doing so, the tribunal wanted at least formal legal recognition of these war crimes to be recorded and the evidence of their guilt assembled. That’s the same reason a separate panel of this tribunal will hold hearings later this year on charges of torture against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and others.
Here’s what I find striking about this. Virtually every Serious political and media elite in America, by definition, would scoff at this tribunal; few things are considered more fringe or ludicrous than the notion that George Bush and Tony Blair should be punished as war criminals just because they aggressively attacked another nation and caused the deaths of at least 150,000 innocent people and the displacement of millions more. But the only thing this Malaysian tribunal is doing is applying the clear principles of the Nuremberg Tribunal as enunciated by lead prosecutor and former U.S. Attorney General Robert Jackson in his Opening and Closing Statements at Nuremberg:
The central crime in this pattern of crimes, the kingpin which holds them all together, is the plot for aggressive wars. The chief reason for international cognizance of these crimes lies in this fact. . . .
What makes this inquest significant is that these prisoners represent sinister influences that will lurk in the world long after their bodies have returned to dust. . . . . And let me make clear that while this law is first applied against German aggressors, the law includes, and if it is to serve a useful purpose it must condemn aggression by any other nations, including those which sit here now in judgment.
The “kingpin” crime of the German defendants was not genocide or ethnic cleansing, but rather “the plot for aggressive war,” and the only way that the Nuremberg Tribunal will “serve a useful purpose” is if it applies equally in the future to “aggression by any other nations, including those which sit here now in judgment.” Who do you think history will (and should) look more favorably upon? Those in this Kuala Lumpur tribunal who objected to the heinous war crime that is the attack on Iraq and attempted to hold the responsible leaders accountable under the Nuremberg principles, or those in America and Britain who mocked those efforts (when they weren’t ignoring them) and demanded that they and their leaders be fully exempted from the principles they imposed and decreed as universal after World War II?
UPDATE: Andrew Sullivan, who yesterday expressed angry bafflement over the fact that many liberals do not swoon for President Obama the way Jon Chait does, today noted that the U.S. under Obama imposes even less accountability for abuse of power and war crimes than does Bahrain:
Bahrain’s Sunni government promised “no immunity” for anyone suspected of abuses and said it would propose creating a permanent human rights watchdog commission. “All those who have broken the law or ignored lawful orders and instructions will be held accountable,” said a government statement, which says the report acknowledges that the “systematic practice of mistreatment” ended shortly after martial law was repealed on June 1.
As Andrew put it: “So a Middle East dictatorship has more democratic accountability for abuse of power, including torture, than the US under Obama.” Beyond things like this and the facts set forth in the last paragraph here, perhaps Andrew could use today’s post of his to help clear up the towering mystery he raised yesterday of liberal disenchantment with Obama. That American war criminals are being aggressively shielded from any and all accountability is not an ancillary matter but one of enduring historical significance.
You Might Also Like
More Related Stories
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
-
Brazil lawmakers vote to lift ban on gay "conversion therapy"
-
Darrell Issa is terrible at his job
-
GOP has learned absolutely nothing from 2012
-
Dem congressman to sue IRS over "social welfare" rules
-
Virginia man pleads guilty to forging Newt Gingrich primary signatures
-
Poll: Cory Booker has huge lead over likely Republican opponent
-
Karzai suspends peace talks with Taliban
Featured Slide Shows
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The protests take on a festive element as police forces move out of the park and square. Wearing a gas mask, this young man dances to traditional Turkish music in front of Taksim Square’s Ataturk Monument.
-
In Gezi Park since March 31st, this protester, originally caught off-guard by the Government’s teargas and water cannons, went out and bought a Russian army mask from WWII, preparing for what was to come.
-
This rambunctious boy seems to be enjoying the chaos. After taking this picture he threw a stone at the already destroyed building in the background.
-
Forming a line, the police face off directly with protesters in Taksim Square. After a while, they retreated and there was a general cheer – a back-and-forth dance that has been common since the beginning of this protest.
-
An elderly woman in Gezi Park reads the news. The tent community occupying the park was violently destroyed on June 16th.
-
Many different groups had set up booths to promote their cause in Taksim Square and Gezi Park. Standing in front of one, this man waves his flag while posing with conviction.
-
Many home-remedies are used to minimize the effects of tear gas. This woman has put a milky solution on her face, removing her mask after the tear gas dissipated. Before sunrise, the police came again for another round of teargasing.
-
People capitalize on the uprising -- selling flags, beer, gas masks, sky lanterns and spray paint to name just a few of the popular items.
-
On Monday morning, June 11, the police execute a strong offensive. Many plain-clothed police officers, like the ones seen here, clash with protesters in the side streets away from the main stand-off in Taksim.
-
The authorities seem to be most aggressive in the night, pushing protesters away from the square and park. After being teargassed this young woman catches her breath with other protesters on Siraselviler Street.
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Photos: Turmoil and tear gas in Instanbul's Gezi Park - Slideshow
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
9 amazing drive-in movie theaters still standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
Related Videos
More Related Stories
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
-
Brazil lawmakers vote to lift ban on gay "conversion therapy"
-
Darrell Issa is terrible at his job
-
GOP has learned absolutely nothing from 2012
-
Dem congressman to sue IRS over "social welfare" rules
-
Virginia man pleads guilty to forging Newt Gingrich primary signatures
-
Poll: Cory Booker has huge lead over likely Republican opponent
-
Karzai suspends peace talks with Taliban
Glenn Greenwald (email: GGreenwald@salon.com) is a former Constitutional and civil rights litigator and is the author of three New York Times Bestselling books: two on the Bush administration's executive power and foreign policy abuses, and his latest book, With Liberty and Justice for Some, an indictment of America's
two-tiered system of justice. Greenwald was named by The Atlantic as one of the 25 most influential political commentators in the nation. He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, and is the winner of the 2010 Online Journalism Association Award for his investigative work on the arrest and oppressive detention of Bradley Manning.
Most Read
-
Bank of America whistle-blower's bombshell: "We were told to lie" David Dayen
-
Why Sarah Palin actually matters again Joan Walsh
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses Katie Mcdonough
-
GOP plan to appeal to millennials: "Make abortion funny" Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Why didn't anyone help? Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
Lynda Obst: Hollywood's completely broken Lynda Obst
-
To my daughter on Father's Day: Sorry I used to be a sexist Mo Elleithee
-
The best of Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
The most popular Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
Rahm Emanuel is losing control of his city Mark Guarino

Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

62 points63 points64 points | 22 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
- Chris Rodda: Congress Members Want Military Gays to be Free to Mock Christians
-
Karl Rove: Obama's No Dick Cheney -- He's Worse - Pythia Peay: Is America's 'Money Complex' Bankrupting Its Character? Interview With Psychoanalyst Tom Singer, M.D.
-
Nation Remains Divided On Gun Control -
Republicans Reject Signature Bush Law
- Kid Rock Endorses "The Herm—Uh, No, The Black Guy ... Ben Carson" For Possible Office On Fox News
-
AP CEO Says Government Sources Won't Talk After Justice Department Probe - The 5 Best Quotes From Sean Hannity's Playboy Interview
- FBI Director: "You're Right The American People Are Frustrated" Over Secrecy Of FISA Court
-
Lawmakers Push Fix For Ousted Gay Service Members' Discharge Records
Donate
Blogroll
- Aaron Bady
- Adam Serwer
- Amy Davidson
- Andrew Sullivan
- Antiwar
- As'ad AbuKhalil
- A Tiny Revolution
- Blue Texan
- Black Agenda Report
- Charles Davis
- Chris Floyd
- Corey Robin
- Daily Doubter
- Daily Howler
- Daily Kos
- Digby
- The Dissenter
- Dissenting Justice
- Eschaton
- Eunomia
- Fire Dog Lake
- Foreign Policy's Stephen Walt
- High Clearing
- Hit and Run
- Hyphenated-Republic
- Jesus' General
- Juan Cole
- Julian Sanchez
- Lawyers Guns & Money
- Mark Adomanis
- Murtaza Hussain
- Naked Capitalism/Yves Smith
- National Review's Corner
- Newshoggers
- Outside the Beltway
- Pam's House Blend
- Prism Magazine
- Sadly, No
- Simon Johnson
- Stephen Bainbridge
- Talk Left
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- Taylor Marsh
- Tbogg
- The Agonist
- The Moderate Voice
- The Unapologetic Mexican
- Tom Tomorrow
- Vast Left



Comments
297 Comments