RIP: “Live Free or Die”

GOP candidates in New Hampshire seem to have forgotten the state's motto

Topics: 2012 Elections, New Hampshire,

RIP: "Live Free or Die" Motto forgotten

As New Hampshire gears up for tomorrow’s Republican primary, the candidates seem to have forgotten the state’s motto: “Live free or die.”  Those words capture a libertarian spirit that traditionally has been at the core of conservatism in this country: that the government should not intrude unnecessarily into the lives of its citizens.  Where national security policies are concerned, though, most of the GOP candidates’ commitment to this principle — and to other principles that are nominally favored by conservatives — appears to be running thin.

Take the candidates’ position on the government’s use of its war powers against U.S. citizens.  The powers a government exercises during wartime — including detention without charge and summary execution — represent a far greater intrusion on individual liberties than, say, the power to raise taxes or confiscate private property.  To an unprecedented extent, our government is claiming the right to exercise these drastic powers against Americans.

One might expect conservatives to unite against this trend.  The specter of the government turning its military force against the people helped drive conservatives’ support for an individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment.  Yet most of the candidates seem unconcerned about indefinite military detention for U.S. citizens. Three of them (Romney, Perry and Santorum) have praised the government’s execution, without trial and based on secret information, of U.S. citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki.

Conservatives also tend to be “tough on crime,” which might explain their position on detaining or executing suspected terrorists.  But suspected wrongdoers aren’t the only ones surrendering the right, so cherished by conservatives, to be left alone by the government.  Changes in the law after 9/11 have allowed government officials to invade Americans’ privacy even when no reason for suspicion exists.  For instance, the PATRIOT Act allows the FBI to obtain any American’s telephone and financial records without a warrant, regardless of whether that person is a suspect in an investigation.  At a debate in November, Gingrich and Perry supported extending this power.

In any case, being “tough on crime” is another conservative principle that is seemingly going by the wayside.  Currently, the government can try suspected terrorists either in civilian courts or in military commissions.  The scorecard is clear: Since 9/11, civilian courts have convicted more than 400 terrorists, while military commissions have convicted a mere handful.  Moreover, the average sentence imposed by civilian courts is higher.  If you go by results, civilian courts are unquestionably “tougher.”  Nonetheless, most of the candidates favor sending suspected terrorists to military commissions.

Another traditional conservative principle is hatred of “big government” and wasting taxpayers’ money.  Nowhere is such waste more evident than in our country’s bloated national security apparatus.  As Dana Priest reports in her recent book, “Top Secret America,” 51 government organizations track the flow of terrorist finances.  And yet, while Rick Perry can name (on a good day) three federal agencies he would like to eliminate, none of these organizations made the list.  Romney, for his part, supports expanding Guantanamo at a cost of $800,000 per inmate per year, rather than using U.S. prisons that would provide equal security (no prisoner has ever escaped from a supermax prison) at one thirtieth the cost.

Finally, conservatives have long championed the importance of religion in American life and opposed any government encroachment on religious freedom.  But today, many law enforcement agencies consider devoutness among Muslims to be a sign of potential terrorism.  In some places, government informants are paid to infiltrate mosques at random.  Such religious profiling makes American Muslims apprehensive about openly practicing their faith.  Instead of crying foul at this governmental interference with religion, Santorum has embraced the profiling of Muslims, and Gingrich favors loyalty tests for Muslims who wish to serve in government.

The truth is, our post-9/11 counterterrorism apparatus has become everything conservatives claim to hate in government: coercive, intrusive, ineffective, wasteful and violative of religious freedoms.  And yet, the only Republican candidate who seems to have noticed — Ron Paul — is the one considered outside the mainstream.  Even the supposedly libertarian Tea Party members in Congress mostly support the runaway national security establishment.

To be sure, this is not a partisan phenomenon.  Conservatives’ wavering commitment to their proclaimed values is matched by a wavering commitment on the part of progressives in government — including congressional Democrats and, on some issues, President Obama — to the civil liberties and human rights they espouse.  This abandonment of principles on both sides of the aisle has enabled the national security establishment’s exponential growth in size and powers.

Which means that New Hampshire, with its proud history of championing individual liberties, has something to teach all of the candidates for office this year.

Elizabeth Goitein co-directs the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>