Newt Gingrich can’t talk his way out of Freddie Mac tie
His former firm invents excuses not to release the former speaker's "consulting" contract
Topics: Newt Gingrich, Mortgage Crisis, Freddie Mac, 2012 Elections, Republican Party, Politics News
I bet, when he launched his presidential campaign in what I still assume was primarily an attempt to embarrass those who said he’d never actually do it, that Newt Gingrich did not think his greatest liability would be consulting for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. No, he surely assumed it’d be the marriages, adulteries and divorces. Or even the climate change ad with Nancy Pelosi. But the one attack he has not been able to talk his way out of has turned out to be that he took a great deal of money from Freddie Mac, which, according to Republican lore, caused the financial crisis.
Freddie Mac paid Gingrich’s consulting firm at least $1.6 million for his time. Exactly how much — and how much went to Gingrich — is still unknown, because reporters haven’t seen the contract between Freddie Mac and Gingrich’s Center for Health Transformation. Gingrich initially said Freddie Mac refused to waive a confidentiality agreement that would allow him to release the contract. But:
Freddie Mac officials said last week that Gingrich was “welcome” to release the contract, under which his consulting firm was paid at least $1.6 million over eight years for his services.
So Gingrich said it’s up to his partners at his former firm to release it. For some reason, a lawyer for Center for Health Transformation is still blocking the release. He wrote to Bloomberg News:
Even though Freddie Mac is willing to allow the document to be made public, allowing a release of the documents in this case might put the confidentiality of other Center for Health Transformation clients at risk, said Stefan Passantino, an attorney representing the firm.
“The risks of any kind of confidentiality waiver, even if the company tried to limit it to one client or one document, are too great to be feasible,” Passantino said in an e-mail yesterday. “A limited waiver is not possible and I am unable to authorize such a release.”
It’s just too risky! Other clients may accidentally waive their own confidentiality agreements and the world will learn how much Newt Gingrich bilked them for. Releasing just one specific document relating to one specific client could put the entire world at risk of an EMP strike, too. You can’t be too careful.
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene.





Rep. Issa Aware Of IRS Investigation Since Last July
French President Hollande Signs Marriage Equality Bill
Obama Group Braces For Progressive Backlash Over Keystone
Republican Lawmakers Took IRS Union Campaign Cash
Comments
9 Comments