South Carolina, the troublemaker
Republicans campaign for votes in a state that is proud, reactionary and a little crazy
Topics: 2012 Elections, South Carolina, Politics News
Throughout its troubled, troubling history, South Carolina has been America’s agent provocateur, a political troublemaker vastly out of scale to its ranking as the nation’s 26th most-populous state. Today, with South Carolina’s primary around the corner, its role of national turd-disturber is heightened by the fact that since 1980 every successful Republican nominee for president has won the South Carolina primary.
South Carolina’s role as national bellwether bad-boy was cemented long ago, in 1861, in fact, when unionist attorney James L. Petigru, possibly the last sane man in antebellum Charleston, complained about his state’s secession from the American Union, decrying, “South Carolina, too small to be a republic, too big to be an asylum.” It should thus be no surprise that this coming Saturday, a tiny number of South Carolinian Republicans have the opportunity to place their loony imprimatur on the upcoming national election.
In the 150 years since South Carolina played a key role in precipitating the Civil War, politics in the Palmetto State have regularly lived down to James Petigru’s epithet. How else to explain the hubris, arrogance and/or sheer stupidity that are key motifs for modern-day South Carolina politics. Reference the romance-besotted former Gov. Mark Sanford, the socially extreme Sen. Jim DeMint, and Rep. Joe Wilson who stunned the nation at the 2009 State of the Union with his dissing of the president, calling him a liar on national television from the floor of the House.
South Carolina’s disproportionate sense of reverse manifest destiny actually began in colonial times. It resided in such proud achievements as being the British/American penal colony with the highest percentage of slaves, over 40 percent of the total population. Throughout the 1700s, Charleston was America’s wealthiest city, buoyed by the plantation economy and slave trade. So important was slavery that in 1740 South Carolina’s colonial Legislature passed the “Negro Act,” actually forbidding owners from freeing their slaves without official say-so.
At the start of the Revolution, South Carolina informed the Continental Congress that it would refuse to sign the Declaration of Independence unless slavery was recognized. South Carolina even demanded the right to disregard an embargo on trade with Great Britain agreed to by the 12 other colonies. It was an exemption that allowed South Carolina to maintain its lucrative rice trade and remain among the richest colonies throughout the Revolution, which it largely sat out, happily occupied by the British army.
Continue Reading CloseRichard Rapaport is a Bay Area writer. He can be reached atrjrap@aol.com More Richard Rapaport.



Comments
55 Comments