
Iran, threats and the UN Charter
The UN Charter requires that all members "shall refrain from the threat or use of force"; does that matter at all?
By Glenn GreenwaldTopics: Politics News
(updated below)
The Washington Post‘s David Ignatius today persuasively argues that President Obama, in his interview with The Atlantic‘s Jeffrey Goldberg, issued his most absolute and inflexible threat yet to attack Iran — not if Iran attacks or is about to attack another country, but merely if it appears to be developing a nuclear weapon:
The other point that struck me was Obama’s clarity about establishing a “red line” between an Iranian civilian nuclear program (acceptable) and a weapons program (unacceptable). . . . His message to Israel: If the Iranians cross this red line, the United States will attack. . . . Is Obama bluffing? Who can say, but if you’re an Iranian decision maker (or, perhaps more important, Netanyahu) you have to weigh a bit more heavily the possibility that the president really does mean what he says.
And that is indeed what Obama did, as Goldberg makes clear in describing the interview:
Obama told me earlier this week that both Iran and Israel should take seriously the possibility of American action against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “I think that the Israeli government recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don’t bluff. . . . I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say.” . . . In the interview, Obama stated specifically that “all options are on the table,” and that the final option is the “military component.”
Regardless of how one wants to rationalize these threats of an offensive military attack — they’re necessary to persuade the Israelis not to attack, they’re necessary to gain leverage with Iran, etc. — the U.N. Charter, to which the U.S. is a signatory, explicitly prohibits not just a military attack on another nation, but also the issuance of threats of such an attack. From Chapter II, paragraph 4:
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
Does this matter at all? Should we even pretend to care in any way what the U.N. Charter prohibits and whether the U.S. Government’s threats to attack Iran directly violate its core provisions? I’m not asking this simple question rhetorically but rather to hear the answer.
* * * * *
Several related points: (1) for those claiming that Obama has no other viable choice but to sanction and threaten Iran, recall that his own former adviser on Iran, Vali Nasr, harshly criticized the administration last month for failing to pursue a course of negotiations with Tehran; (2) The New York Times today has two Op-Eds on the sanctions regime being imposed on Iran — one pro and one con — which both make the point that the primary effect of this sanction regime is to cause serious suffering, even hunger, among the Iranian people; such “crippling” sanctions are usually advocated by the very same individuals who feign such concern for The Iranian People when it comes to railing against the abuses of their government (unnamed Israeli officials were quoted in the Israeli press today urging mass hunger as a means to force Iran to concede); (3) Noam Chomsky has a very dispassionate, excellent new article laying out some clear and basic facts about the Iran situation that are rarely aired; and (4) The Atlantic‘s Robert Wright explains why an air attack on Iran would almost certainly require ground force activity.
UPDATE: A few other related points: (1) the U.N. Security Council in 1981 harshly condemned the Israeli air attack on Iraq’s nuclear power facility as a “clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international conduct”; that Resolution also “call[ed] upon Israel urgently to place its nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards” (via MediaLens, which notes that “even the US didn’t abstain”); (2) former Obama Pentagon official Colin Kahl argues today that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the 1981 Israeli attack on Iraq made Iraqi proliferation more likely, not less likely; (3) a cartoon from VastLeft on Obama, Iran and sanctions; and (4) Chris Toensing of the Middle East Research Information Project has an excellent article rebutting the claim (issuing from the predictable circles) that Obama is not to blame for the sky-high tensions and possible war.
You Might Also Like
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Featured Slide Shows
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The protests take on a festive element as police forces move out of the park and square. Wearing a gas mask, this young man dances to traditional Turkish music in front of Taksim Square’s Ataturk Monument.
-
In Gezi Park since March 31st, this protester, originally caught off-guard by the Government’s teargas and water cannons, went out and bought a Russian army mask from WWII, preparing for what was to come.
-
This rambunctious boy seems to be enjoying the chaos. After taking this picture he threw a stone at the already destroyed building in the background.
-
Forming a line, the police face off directly with protesters in Taksim Square. After a while, they retreated and there was a general cheer – a back-and-forth dance that has been common since the beginning of this protest.
-
An elderly woman in Gezi Park reads the news. The tent community occupying the park was violently destroyed on June 16th.
-
Many different groups had set up booths to promote their cause in Taksim Square and Gezi Park. Standing in front of one, this man waves his flag while posing with conviction.
-
Many home-remedies are used to minimize the effects of tear gas. This woman has put a milky solution on her face, removing her mask after the tear gas dissipated. Before sunrise, the police came again for another round of teargasing.
-
People capitalize on the uprising -- selling flags, beer, gas masks, sky lanterns and spray paint to name just a few of the popular items.
-
On Monday morning, June 11, the police execute a strong offensive. Many plain-clothed police officers, like the ones seen here, clash with protesters in the side streets away from the main stand-off in Taksim.
-
The authorities seem to be most aggressive in the night, pushing protesters away from the square and park. After being teargassed this young woman catches her breath with other protesters on Siraselviler Street.
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Photos: Turmoil and tear gas in Instanbul's Gezi Park - Slideshow
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
9 amazing drive-in movie theaters still standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
Related Videos
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Glenn Greenwald (email: GGreenwald@salon.com) is a former Constitutional and civil rights litigator and is the author of three New York Times Bestselling books: two on the Bush administration's executive power and foreign policy abuses, and his latest book, With Liberty and Justice for Some, an indictment of America's
two-tiered system of justice. Greenwald was named by The Atlantic as one of the 25 most influential political commentators in the nation. He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, and is the winner of the 2010 Online Journalism Association Award for his investigative work on the arrest and oppressive detention of Bradley Manning.
Most Read
-
Bank of America whistle-blower's bombshell: "We were told to lie" David Dayen
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses Katie Mcdonough
-
Why Sarah Palin actually matters again Joan Walsh
-
The best of Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
Vice re-creates female authors' suicides for maximum trolling Michele Filgate
-
GOP plan to appeal to millennials: "Make abortion funny" Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Lynda Obst: Hollywood's completely broken Lynda Obst
-
Guys worry about sex on the first date too Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
The most popular Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
To my daughter on Father's Day: Sorry I used to be a sexist Mo Elleithee

Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

32 points33 points34 points | 42 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
- Chuck Hagel Jokes That Indian Man Asking Him A Question Is A Member Of The Taliban
-
Anti-Immigration Reform Crusader Steve King Feels The Tea Party Love -
Republican Congressman: Does Dianne Feinstein Want Guantanamo Detainees To Die? -
20 Powerful Black-And-White Photographs Of Regular Americans From History -
Michael Hastings In Baghdad
Donate
Blogroll
- Aaron Bady
- Adam Serwer
- Amy Davidson
- Andrew Sullivan
- Antiwar
- As'ad AbuKhalil
- A Tiny Revolution
- Blue Texan
- Black Agenda Report
- Charles Davis
- Chris Floyd
- Corey Robin
- Daily Doubter
- Daily Howler
- Daily Kos
- Digby
- The Dissenter
- Dissenting Justice
- Eschaton
- Eunomia
- Fire Dog Lake
- Foreign Policy's Stephen Walt
- High Clearing
- Hit and Run
- Hyphenated-Republic
- Jesus' General
- Juan Cole
- Julian Sanchez
- Lawyers Guns & Money
- Mark Adomanis
- Murtaza Hussain
- Naked Capitalism/Yves Smith
- National Review's Corner
- Newshoggers
- Outside the Beltway
- Pam's House Blend
- Prism Magazine
- Sadly, No
- Simon Johnson
- Stephen Bainbridge
- Talk Left
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- Taylor Marsh
- Tbogg
- The Agonist
- The Moderate Voice
- The Unapologetic Mexican
- Tom Tomorrow
- Vast Left


Comments
491 Comments