Iran’s Talking Point: ‘Dignity’ In Nuclear Work
Topics: From the Wires, News
FILE - In this Saturday, Aug. 21, 2010, file photo, an Iranian security directs media at the Bushehr nuclear power plant, with the reactor building seen in the background, just outside the southern city of Bushehr, Iran. Iran has steadfastly balked at demands to halt its uranium enrichment, which Washington and its allies worry could be the foundation for a future nuclear weapons program. Iran claims it only seeks energy and medical research from its reactors, but wants full control over the nuclear process from uranium ore to atomic fuel. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)(Credit: AP)DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Days before Iran’s just-completed parliamentary elections, the country’s supreme leader gave what amounted to a pep rally on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear views.
Atomic technology is a pillar of “national dignity,” boasted Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Iran must stand firm against the “bullying” pressures from the West.
It showed how deeply Iran’s leadership cares about its nuclear program in the face of efforts by the West, which is still hoping the finesse of diplomacy and the vise of sanctions can persuade Tehran to roll back on its ambitions and ease calls for military action, possibly led by Israel.
Iran has steadfastly rejected demands to halt its uranium enrichment, which Washington and its allies worry could be the foundation for a future nuclear weapons program. Iran claims it seeks only energy and medical research from its reactors, but it wants full control over the nuclear process from uranium ore to fuel rods.
Another layer was added to Iranian resolve last week when parliamentary elections gave Khamenei loyalists clear control of the chamber. It has no direct sway over key policies such as the nuclear program but can reinforce the messages from the ruling clerics.
With a pliant parliament, Khamenei and the theocracy now have one less internal distraction at a potentially pivotal time: An attack on Iran is clearly on the table, at least as a talking point or a threat.
“We understand the costs of any military action,” said U.S. President Barack Obama on Monday after White House talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The meeting clearly showed where they part company: Obama urging for more time to allow a mix of negotiations and economic pressures on Iran; Netanyahu saying that Israel must remain the “master of its own fate,” while noting no decision has been made on a unilateral attack. Israel would consider a nuclear-armed Iran a threat to its existence.
Both leaders, though, made it clear Iran must not develop a nuclear bomb, which could touch off a Middle East arms race and embolden Tehran’s proxies, such as the anti-Israel group Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Absent from the Washington talks — at least publicly — was recognition of the challenges facing any effort to force Iran to backpedal on its nuclear advances.
From the perspective of Iran’s leaders, national pride is on the line.




Comments are not enabled for this story.