
Healthcare reform won’t damage Democrats
The effects in the 2010 congressional races won't be repeated this year
By Jonathan BernsteinTopics: 2012 Elections, Healthcare Reform, Politics News
How will healthcare reform affect the 2012 presidential election? The topic is back in the news with the publication of a new paper by five political scientists who demonstrate not only that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) had a major effect in 2010, but also how that effect happened: by branding those who supported “ObamaCare” as very liberal.
The Weekly Standard’s Jeffrey Anderson and William Kristol cite that paper to argue that Barack Obama should be doomed – and that Republicans should support Rick Santorum over Mitt Romney because Santorum would be best able to campaign on the issue. Indeed, one would think that the most important, and perhaps most controversial, piece of legislation passed during Barack Obama’s term would have direct, significant effects on his chance for reelection. But that’s almost certainly not the case, and Republicans would be foolish to base their nomination on Anderson and Kristol’s advice.
I’ll start with the difference between 2010 House races, which the team of political scientists studied, and a presidential election. The truth is that those types of elections – midterm House and presidential – have little in common. In both cases, party identification is important. But beyond that, there are quite a few important differences. House elections are typically low-information contests. Most of us barely know who our own Member of the House is, let alone much about him or her. We typically know even less about the challenger. In that kind of context any new information can, it turns out, be fairly potent. As Gary Jacobson has shown, knowing one “good” or “bad” thing about a House candidate (that is, something one believes is good or bad) can have a surprisingly large effect on how one votes. In the case of the healthcare study, it turned out that just knowing that a member voted for ACA was enough to make a significant change in voters’ estimates of how liberal that member was. And why not? It’s not as if people knew of all the other things going on in Washington.
By contrast, presidential elections are heavily funded, high-information contests. That’s particularly true about an incumbent president. Think about it: I bet everyone reading this can reel off a dozen facts about Barack Obama without even trying. You know about healthcare, you know about the stimulus, you know about bin Laden; you know his wife’s name, and his kids, and where he went to high school; you know, probably, about his birth certificate and his old church in Chicago and some of the other attacks that have been made against him. Learning something new about him – say, how he deals with the situation in Syria – probably won’t change what you think of him. In fact, it probably works the other way around; if you already like Obama you’ll assume that what he does in Syria makes sense, and if you don’t like him you’ll be inclined to be critical of what he does there.
Indeed, you probably know quite a bit about Mitt Romney. If you’re a partisan Democrat, you already don’t like him, and if you’re a partisan Republican … well, you may or may not like him now, but after the convention, and after Republican opinion leaders wind up fully supporting him, odds are you will.
Remember, the study found that healthcare hurt Democrats by making people think they were more liberal than they otherwise would have thought. So the question is: To what extent has ACA changed people’s opinions about Barack Obama? My guess is that whatever the answer to that might be, it’s a lot less than the extent to which it changed people’s views of their Member of Congress because it has to compete with so much other information.
At the same time, the Obama campaign apparently believes that healthcare reform could be a plus for him, at least among some key groups – such as women who will have contraception covered under the new law. I’m skeptical about much of an effect there, either, and for the same reason; adding one piece of information is unlikely to change anyone’s mind about Obama. That’s not to say that his campaign shouldn’t try (or that Republicans shouldn’t attempt to pound home their ObamaCare message); after all, if you have raised gazillions of dollars, you might as well use them, and on the margins campaigns certainly can matter, even at the presidential level. It’s just that the overall effect of the entire campaign is relatively small, and so any particular piece of it or a single issue is most likely even smaller. Or, think of it this way: The Republican assault on Planned Parenthood and many of the more aggressive GOP initiatives on abortion have been legislatively separate from the ACA-related birth control wars. The Obama campaign was going to target single women and young women anyway; healthcare reform is just part of the story there.
Moreover, whatever the effects healthcare will have on Barack Obama, it’s almost certainly already incorporated in his overall polling right now; there’s no reason to expect a further change as a result of the fall campaign. I suppose it’s possible that the upcoming Supreme Court ruling could shift public perceptions of ACA somewhat and in turn move Obama’s approval a bit. But I’d expect most changes in Obama’s approval rating, and his overall chances for reelection, to be driven by events from this point on, particularly changes in the economy. There’s really no good argument – and plenty of political science theory against it – to expect healthcare to exert much effect on Obama’s reelection all by itself.
Jonathan Bernstein writes at a Plain Blog About Politics. Follow him at @jbplainblog More Jonathan Bernstein.
You Might Also Like
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Featured Slide Shows
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The protests take on a festive element as police forces move out of the park and square. Wearing a gas mask, this young man dances to traditional Turkish music in front of Taksim Square’s Ataturk Monument.
-
In Gezi Park since March 31st, this protester, originally caught off-guard by the Government’s teargas and water cannons, went out and bought a Russian army mask from WWII, preparing for what was to come.
-
This rambunctious boy seems to be enjoying the chaos. After taking this picture he threw a stone at the already destroyed building in the background.
-
Forming a line, the police face off directly with protesters in Taksim Square. After a while, they retreated and there was a general cheer – a back-and-forth dance that has been common since the beginning of this protest.
-
An elderly woman in Gezi Park reads the news. The tent community occupying the park was violently destroyed on June 16th.
-
Many different groups had set up booths to promote their cause in Taksim Square and Gezi Park. Standing in front of one, this man waves his flag while posing with conviction.
-
Many home-remedies are used to minimize the effects of tear gas. This woman has put a milky solution on her face, removing her mask after the tear gas dissipated. Before sunrise, the police came again for another round of teargasing.
-
People capitalize on the uprising -- selling flags, beer, gas masks, sky lanterns and spray paint to name just a few of the popular items.
-
On Monday morning, June 11, the police execute a strong offensive. Many plain-clothed police officers, like the ones seen here, clash with protesters in the side streets away from the main stand-off in Taksim.
-
The authorities seem to be most aggressive in the night, pushing protesters away from the square and park. After being teargassed this young woman catches her breath with other protesters on Siraselviler Street.
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Photos: Turmoil and tear gas in Instanbul's Gezi Park - Slideshow
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
9 amazing drive-in movie theaters still standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
Related Videos
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Most Read
-
Bank of America whistle-blower's bombshell: "We were told to lie" David Dayen
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses Katie Mcdonough
-
Why Sarah Palin actually matters again Joan Walsh
-
The best of Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
Vice re-creates female authors' suicides for maximum trolling Michele Filgate
-
GOP plan to appeal to millennials: "Make abortion funny" Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Lynda Obst: Hollywood's completely broken Lynda Obst
-
Guys worry about sex on the first date too Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
The most popular Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
To my daughter on Father's Day: Sorry I used to be a sexist Mo Elleithee

Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

34 points35 points36 points | 43 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
- Chuck Hagel Jokes That Indian Man Asking Him A Question Is A Member Of The Taliban
-
Anti-Immigration Reform Crusader Steve King Feels The Tea Party Love -
Republican Congressman: Does Dianne Feinstein Want Guantanamo Detainees To Die? -
20 Powerful Black-And-White Photographs Of Regular Americans From History -
Michael Hastings In Baghdad



Comments
32 Comments