# Odds of winning record lottery jackpot 1 in 176 M

Topics: From the Wires,

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — With the multistate Mega Millions jackpot set to reach a world-record \$540 million Friday, lottery players across the country are wondering if there’s a way to guarantee becoming an overnight multimillionaire.

The answer: Not unless you already are one and own a magic wand.

The jackpot is so large, someone with enough money could theoretically buy up every single combination of winning numbers, thereby guaranteeing a winning ticket — but only if you suspended the laws of physics.

A \$540 million jackpot, if taken as a \$390 lump sum and after federal tax withholding, works out to about \$293 million. With the jackpot odds at 1 in 176 million, it would cost \$176 million to buy up every single combination. Under that scenario, the strategy would win \$117 million — less if your state also withholds taxes.

But there are too many limitations. First, if it takes five seconds to fill out each card, you’d need almost 28 years just to mark the bubbles on the game tickets. You’d also use up the national supply of special lottery paper and lottery-machine printing ink well before all your tickets could be printed out.

And with a jackpot this large, experts say, there is more of a chance of multiple winners. If you have to share the jackpot with even one fellow winner, you’ve lost \$30 million.

Mike Catalano, chairman of the mathematics department at Dakota Wesleyan University in Mitchell, S.D., said he covers the odds of winning in lottery games with his students in an attempt to show them how unlikely it is to win big.

He concedes the math is clear: The more tickets you buy, the better your chances of winning. So, if you buy 10 tickets filled out 10 different ways, your odds of winning the jackpot 10 in 176 million.

“You are about 50 times as likely to get struck by lightning as to win the lottery, based on the 90 people a year getting struck by lightning,” Catalano said. “Of course, if you buy 50 tickets, you’ve equalized your chances of winning the jackpot with getting struck by lightning.”

Based on other averages in the U.S., you’re about 8,000 times more likely to be murdered than winning the lottery, and about 20,000 times more likely to die in a car crash that hit the lucky numbers, Catalano said.

“You might get some psychological enjoyment from playing the lottery, but from a financial standpoint … you’d be much better off going to Las Vegas and playing blackjack or the slot machines.”

But that chance — however small — of instantaneous, enormous wealth is leading to long lines of people at convenience stores in 42 states and Washington, D.C., where Mega Millions tickets are sold.

It’s why David Kramer, a lawyer in Lincoln, bought a Mega Million ticket Thursday.

“To me, the value of the lottery ticket isn’t the realistic opportunity to win,” he said. “It’s the fact that for three days, the daydreaming time about what I would do if I won is great entertainment and, frankly, a very nice release from a normal day.”

Chris Stites, of Fishers, Ind., stopped by a market in downtown Indianapolis on Thursday to spend \$20 he and his co-workers pooled for Mega Millions tickets. He said he hopes buying in a group improves their odds.

“I’ve got as good a shot as anyone,” Stites said. “It may be slim, but it’s the same as it is for other people.”

Even those seemingly well aware of the odds were buying lottery tickets this week, including Dymond Fields, of St. Paul, Minn., a retail store cashier who bought one ticket.

“I’ve got bills to pay, I do not have money to be paying five lottery tickets,” Fields said. “If I don’t win, it’s money gone. I see people paying \$30, \$40, \$50, and that’s just painful.”

And as if to prove how long the odds are, in line to buy tickets with Fields was 80-year-old Everett Eahmer, of St. Paul, who said he’s been playing the lottery “since the beginning.”

“If I win, the first thing I’m going to do is buy a (Tim) Tebow football shirt, and I’m going to do the Tebow pose,” said Eahmer, who bought five tickets. “I’m with him in honoring a higher power.”

After years of playing, he’s not grown discouraged by the long odds.

“You have to get your foot in the door,” he said. “If you don’t play, you know you don’t win anything.”

Lottery officials are happy to have Friday’s record Mega Millions jackpot fueling ticket sales, but even they caution against spending large amounts of money per person in the hopes of striking it rich.

“We certainly know we get more pool play … people coming in making very large purchases for a group,” said Chuck Strutt, executive director of the Urbandale, Iowa-based Multi-State Lottery Association that oversees the Mega Millions, Powerball and other lotteries. “When people ask me, I just tell them that the odds of a lottery game make it a game of fate. Just buy a ticket, sit back and see if fate points a finger at you for that day.”

____

Contributing to this report are Associated Press writers Dinesh Ramde, reporting from Milwaukee; Carrie Schedler, reporting from Indianapolis; and Alexandra Tempus, reporting from St. Paul, Minn.

### Featured Slide Shows

• 1 of 13
• Close
• Fullscreen
• Thumbnails

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Californication" (seven seasons)

This show is the current most-unlikely-to-still-be-on champ. It’s perhaps the least-discussed show on Showtime, and has been for years. (David Duchovny won a Golden Globe for the show … in 2008!) Since the show’s mildly buzzed-about early years, the protagonist evidently got in legal trouble for statutory rape and, after that, wrote a musical!

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Entourage" (eight seasons)

Much like “Californication,” this man-centric show started strong and buzzy -- a perpetual nominee at the Golden Globes and Emmys, and a perceived gender-swapped “Sex and the City.” Then it ground on and on, and what might once have been read as a sophisticated satire of Hollywood materialism became a grinding conveyor belt of self-congratulatory guest-star appearances.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Will & Grace" (eight seasons)

Hey, did someone say “self-congratulatory guest-star appearances?” Look -- it’s Jennifer Lopez, and Cher, and Janet Jackson, and Madonna! The latter seasons of “Will & Grace” effectively ruined the fun of watching the show in syndication now -- will it be a fun and jaunty early episode, or a later episode in which title characters enact an Ibsen play about having a baby together (really) while Jack and Karen meet one pop star or another? The fact that the show hastened a widespread acceptance of gay people that, then, made the show something of a throwback by the time it ended is one thing; the fact that the show itself seemed uninterested in relying on its actors’ sharp comic timing is quite another.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"The King of Queens" (nine seasons)

This CBS stalwart just kind of kept going, exactly as long as was needed to launch Kevin James’ film career. In the show’s final minutes, a formulaic sitcom became a mile-a-minute soap, with the central characters considering divorce and then having two children.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Frasier" (11 seasons)

Though it ended strong, "Frasier" had something of the opposite problem as “The King of Queens”: While the CBS comedy chucked a whole bunch of plot at viewers toward the end, NBC’s Emmy magnet stayed stuck in familiar ruts, with Frasier questing endlessly for love and Daphne and Niles in fairly unthrilling domestic bliss. The jokes stayed good, but this maybe could have gone one or two years shorter.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Weeds" (eight seasons)

As “Homeland” viewers may be learning, Showtime isn’t particularly good at keeping its shows coherent over time. (Maybe this is “Californication”’s issue -- we wouldn’t know!) This show changed settings and, effectively, organizing conceits so many times that by the end, it had few earnest defenders.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Nip/Tuck" (six seasons)

This FX series, too, changed settings midway through, moving from Miami to Los Angeles four seasons in for no compelling reason. The show’s most gripping subplots had a way of petering out (remember the anticlimactic solution to the mystery of the Carver?), and its bizarre tendencies overtook any sense of fun.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Glee" (five seasons and counting)

The series has, like its sibling show “Nip/Tuck” (Ryan Murphy created them both), switched locations, moving in large part to New York once its core cast graduated high school. But what’s the point of a high school series when the stars graduate? Despite some lovely moments, the show’s heat seems gone, and attempts to get back into the conversation (the school shooting episode, for instance) have been more desperate and tone-deaf than effective.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"Grey's Anatomy" (10 seasons and counting)

Here’s the thing: By all accounts, “Grey’s Anatomy” is not a creative failure. And it’s still widely watched. But when you begin your life as a world-beating hit, anything else seems somewhat marginal. “Grey’s Anatomy” has shed more regular viewers than many shows will ever hope to get in the first place (same’s true of “Survivor” and latter-day “ER,” to name just a few). Those who stopped watching once the Golden Globe nominations petered out may wonder why the show is still on; loyal viewers know better.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"The Simpsons" (25 seasons and counting)

Like the “Grey’s” doctors, the Springfield clan and their neighbors still draw a crowd. But “The Simpsons” is so omnipresent in syndication and in pop culture that the first-run series seems besides the point (not least because, though there are good episodes here and there, the show’s best days are universally agreed to be behind it -- like way behind it, in the 1990s).

#### Shows that went on way too long

"The Office" (nine seasons)

There was a natural break for this show, where it ought to have ended -- with the departure of lead actor Steve Carell in Season 7. The latter years were a creative fugue state, and as NBC’s Thursday night lineup continued to flatline in the ratings, one-time fans could be forgiven at their surprise that the adventures of Jim and Pam kept on unfolding.

#### Shows that went on way too long

"The X-Files" (nine seasons)

Once one of the show’s leads departs and has to be replaced -- as Steve Carell did on “The Office,” or David Duchovny did here -- the show faces a reckoning; if the lead is so central to the show’s plot as to make people wonder how the show could possibly go on, maybe the show shouldn’t. And even “X-Files” superfans might have been happier with fewer seasons of drawing out the conspiracy string toward a famously unsatisfying ending.