
Lawsuit filed over discriminatory immigration law
Bi-national couples continue to face horrible choices by virtue of DOMA; a new effort is launched to end that
By Glenn GreenwaldTopics: Politics News
Five legally married, “bi-national” same-sex couples — one spouse is a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national — filed a lawsuit yesterday in federal court seeking the right to live together in the United States. The right of American citizens to have their chosen spouse live with them in the U.S. is more or less automatically granted when the spouse is of the opposite sex: once evidence is submitted attesting to the authenticity of the marriage, the Immigration and Naturalization Service issues a visa and then a Green Card to the foreign national spouse. But the Defense of Marriage Act, the 1996 statute enacted by a huge Congressional majority in both parties and signed into law by President Clinton, expressly bars the granting by the Federal government of any spousal benefits, including immigration rights, to same-sex couples.
That blatantly discriminatory law has produced a serious injustice and substantial hardship: thousands of U.S. citizens are barred from living in their own country with their same-sex spouse. The “luckiest” among them are able to move to their spouse’s country, but that’s a choice available to only a small percentage: for that to work, the foreign spouse’s nation must grant immigration rights to same-sex couples (only a minority of countries do) and the American partner must be able to find work while living outside the U.S. (I’ve written and spoken previously about how this discriminatory framework forces me to live in Brazil with my Brazilian partner, who cannot obtain immigration rights to live, work and/or study in the U.S.). But the vast majority of same-sex couples in this situation do not have even that limited option: instead, they are faced with the horrifying choice of (a) having the foreign partner live illegally in the U.S. (which means they face the constant threat of deportation, cannot legally work or study, and cannot ever leave the country to visit their family back home), or, worse, (b) living thousands of miles apart — continents away — from the person with whom they want to share their life.
This is one of those injustices so extreme and indefensible that it’s difficult, at least for me, to avoid high levels of anger when discussing, and it’s even more difficult to understand how any person could favor its continuation: just imagine having your government deny you the ability to live with your chosen life partner. So inhumane is this forced choice that even many countries that refuse to recognize same-sex marriage nonetheless grant immigration rights to their citizens’ same-sex partners on purely humanitarian grounds. As I’ve written about before, Brazil — with the world’s largest Catholic population, where Catholic bishops and evangelical pastors wield substantial political influence, a nation that was a military dictatorship as recently as 1985 — years ago granted immigration rights to same-sex couples with little controversy even as the question of same-sex marriage remains highly contentious. Yet the U.S. — Land of the Free — continues to deny this most basic right to its citizens; a bill to provide just this narrow immigration right to same-sex couples has been pending for years in Congress, going nowhere.
The lawsuit filed yesterday was commenced by the large New York law firm Paul, Weiss, along with the superb advocacy group Immigration Equality. On its site, that group features a profile of the five plaintiff couples, describing how they met, how many years they’ve been together, and the way in which DOMA forces them to be thousands of miles apart or live in untenable situations. I hear from couples like this all the time. When I spoke a couple of weeks ago at the University of Pennsylvania, I met a professor who is in her mid-sixties and preparing to retire; her partner of many years is an Italian national, also a unviersity professor and soon to retire. All they want to do is spend their retirement years living together and sharing their lives, but because the Penn Professor has health issues that require her to be in the U.S., and DOMA prevents her Italian wife from obtaining immigration rights with her to live in the U.S., they are unable to live on the same continent. It’s a travesty — sadistic and hateful — and it’s simply infuriating. As the complaint filed yesterday put it:
How can that possibly be justified? What makes it even more remarkable is that the U.S. Government, in numerous ways, has formally adopted the policy goal of keeping families together, and yet, as the Complaint puts it, “ironically, it is the federal government that threatens to tear bi-national families apart.” And, of course, the political faction that endlessly claims to advocate for keeping the Government Out Of Our Lives is the primary impediment here to this freedom. That many of these couples have children together makes the policy even more cruel and destructive. An added irony is that the Obama administration, to its credit, now refuses to defend the constitutionality of DOMA in court because it has concluded that the law is so blatantly unconstitutional that the DOJ cannot in good faith defend it, yet it continues to enforce the law.
What ultimately permits this to continue is the lingering belief, even among those claiming to be supportive of gay rights generally, that same-sex married couples are not really the equivalent of opposite-sex married couples. For years now, I’ve continuously encountered attempts — first it was from Bush followers and now often from Obama loyalists — to minimize and belittle the injustice here, as though being forced out of one’s own country in order to be with one’s spouse is some sort of trivial, overblown problem. In fact, the right to choose one’s most intimate relationship and to share one’s life with one’s life partner without interference from the state is the bedrock of individual liberty and human happiness. There is zero justification for defending or minimizing the oppression that results from the denial of this right. This lawsuit may very well succeed, but at best, it will be years before it’s finally resolved. In the meantime, the number of binational same-sex couples will surely increase — a globalized world produces increasing numbers of such couples — and most will continue to face hideous life choices that nobody should have to endure.
* * * * *
On April 15, in Washington D.C., I’m delivering the keynote speech, on Islamophobia and the law, at the annual conference of the National Coaliation to Protect Civil Freedoms; ticket and event information is here. On April 12, in Ottawa, Canada, I’ll be speaking at an event organized by long-time commenter Bill Owen; the heroic Maher Arar will speak as well, and ticket and event information is here. On April 14, I’ll also be at the University of Chicago, and will post more details for that event in a few days.
You Might Also Like
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Featured Slide Shows
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The protests take on a festive element as police forces move out of the park and square. Wearing a gas mask, this young man dances to traditional Turkish music in front of Taksim Square’s Ataturk Monument.
-
In Gezi Park since March 31st, this protester, originally caught off-guard by the Government’s teargas and water cannons, went out and bought a Russian army mask from WWII, preparing for what was to come.
-
This rambunctious boy seems to be enjoying the chaos. After taking this picture he threw a stone at the already destroyed building in the background.
-
Forming a line, the police face off directly with protesters in Taksim Square. After a while, they retreated and there was a general cheer – a back-and-forth dance that has been common since the beginning of this protest.
-
An elderly woman in Gezi Park reads the news. The tent community occupying the park was violently destroyed on June 16th.
-
Many different groups had set up booths to promote their cause in Taksim Square and Gezi Park. Standing in front of one, this man waves his flag while posing with conviction.
-
Many home-remedies are used to minimize the effects of tear gas. This woman has put a milky solution on her face, removing her mask after the tear gas dissipated. Before sunrise, the police came again for another round of teargasing.
-
People capitalize on the uprising -- selling flags, beer, gas masks, sky lanterns and spray paint to name just a few of the popular items.
-
On Monday morning, June 11, the police execute a strong offensive. Many plain-clothed police officers, like the ones seen here, clash with protesters in the side streets away from the main stand-off in Taksim.
-
The authorities seem to be most aggressive in the night, pushing protesters away from the square and park. After being teargassed this young woman catches her breath with other protesters on Siraselviler Street.
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Photos: Turmoil and tear gas in Instanbul's Gezi Park - Slideshow
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
9 amazing drive-in movie theaters still standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
Related Videos
More Related Stories
-
Seven famous apologies that were just as bad as Serena's
-
The Tea Party's sad, nostalgic reunion tour
-
Poll: Dems like "Obamacare" more than "health care law"
-
House GOPer: Teach kids about traditional gender roles
-
FBI admits to using drones over U.S. soil
-
What everybody gets wrong about Orwell
-
Probe launched into TWA Flight 800 crash
-
Snowden's real crime: Humiliating the state
-
National study finds discrimination against gay couples in housing market
-
Sean Hannity: "I'm not a Republican"
-
House GOPer: Term "climate denier" offensive because it's like "Holocaust denier"
-
Delaware passes measure to protect transgender rights
-
Popularity boost for search engines outside NSA dragnets
-
Another "sovereign citizen" sentenced in tax fraud scheme
-
Does Obama know what "transparent" means?
-
Report: 70 percent of Americans "emotionally disconnected" at work
-
What if we demanded Ted Cruz's papers?
-
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski backs marriage equality
-
American middle-class prosperity is pure fantasy
-
Archbishop: "May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is 'yes'"
-
Meet America's most shameless defender of the 1 percent
Glenn Greenwald (email: GGreenwald@salon.com) is a former Constitutional and civil rights litigator and is the author of three New York Times Bestselling books: two on the Bush administration's executive power and foreign policy abuses, and his latest book, With Liberty and Justice for Some, an indictment of America's
two-tiered system of justice. Greenwald was named by The Atlantic as one of the 25 most influential political commentators in the nation. He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, and is the winner of the 2010 Online Journalism Association Award for his investigative work on the arrest and oppressive detention of Bradley Manning.
Most Read
-
Bank of America whistle-blower's bombshell: "We were told to lie" David Dayen
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses Katie Mcdonough
-
Why Sarah Palin actually matters again Joan Walsh
-
The best of Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
Vice re-creates female authors' suicides for maximum trolling Michele Filgate
-
GOP plan to appeal to millennials: "Make abortion funny" Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Lynda Obst: Hollywood's completely broken Lynda Obst
-
Guys worry about sex on the first date too Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
The most popular Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
To my daughter on Father's Day: Sorry I used to be a sexist Mo Elleithee

Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

34 points35 points36 points | 43 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
- Chuck Hagel Jokes That Indian Man Asking Him A Question Is A Member Of The Taliban
-
Anti-Immigration Reform Crusader Steve King Feels The Tea Party Love -
Republican Congressman: Does Dianne Feinstein Want Guantanamo Detainees To Die? -
20 Powerful Black-And-White Photographs Of Regular Americans From History -
Michael Hastings In Baghdad
Donate
Blogroll
- Aaron Bady
- Adam Serwer
- Amy Davidson
- Andrew Sullivan
- Antiwar
- As'ad AbuKhalil
- A Tiny Revolution
- Blue Texan
- Black Agenda Report
- Charles Davis
- Chris Floyd
- Corey Robin
- Daily Doubter
- Daily Howler
- Daily Kos
- Digby
- The Dissenter
- Dissenting Justice
- Eschaton
- Eunomia
- Fire Dog Lake
- Foreign Policy's Stephen Walt
- High Clearing
- Hit and Run
- Hyphenated-Republic
- Jesus' General
- Juan Cole
- Julian Sanchez
- Lawyers Guns & Money
- Mark Adomanis
- Murtaza Hussain
- Naked Capitalism/Yves Smith
- National Review's Corner
- Newshoggers
- Outside the Beltway
- Pam's House Blend
- Prism Magazine
- Sadly, No
- Simon Johnson
- Stephen Bainbridge
- Talk Left
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- Taylor Marsh
- Tbogg
- The Agonist
- The Moderate Voice
- The Unapologetic Mexican
- Tom Tomorrow
- Vast Left




Comments
139 Comments