Romney plays immigration dodgeball
A comprensive guide to everything Romney has refused to say about immigration
Topics: Mitt Romney, 2012 Elections, Immigration, Immigration Reform, Supreme Court, Politics News
FILE - This June 21, 2012 file photo shows Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, speaking at the NALEO (National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials) conference in Orlando, Fla. A federal court decision has created the possibility that some public television and radio stations that are perpetually challenged financially could see a windfall of cash from political advertising. Stations that get that chance would have to weigh whether the money is worth the risk of alienating their audiences. The Kantar Media Campaign Media Analysis Group estimates as much as $3.3 billion could be spent on such advertising this year, up from $2.1 billion in 2008. Stations that benefit most will be in presidential battleground states. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, file) (Credit: AP)In two weeks of news cycles dominated by immigration news, Mitt Romney’s campaign has managed to say almost nothing about immigration. First there was Obama’s surprise announcement on a new deportation policy to spare 800,000 undocumented young people, then there was the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday on Arizona’s immigration law, but Romney’s response to both followed the same basic pattern — avoid substance, slam Obama, call for bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform. This inevitably fails to appease the press, and as reporters demand more answers, the campaign offered only more muddle.
Romney’s first response to the court’s ruling yesterday came in a statement sent to reporters in the morning. “This represents yet another broken promise by this President,” Romney said. “I believe that each state has the duty — and the right — to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. As Candidate Obama, he promised to present an immigration plan during his first year in office. But 4 years later, we are still waiting.”
That left it entirely unclear if Romney actually supported the law or not, so reporters pressed for more. By 11:00, Romney aides said the candidate “has no further comment — and will not comment in person.” The aide said Romney “has been pretty clear on his stance on immigration.”
At 12:45, reporters tried again, this time pressing Romney traveling press secretary Rick Gorka for more on the campaign plane. For an excruciating seven minutes and 22 questions, Gorka impressively avoided saying anything. The questions all tried to divine whether Romney supported Arizona’s immigration law, which he had called a “model” in the past, but Gorka alternated between only two responses: One, that states have the right to do what Arizona did (but not that they should), and two, that Obama had failed to lead on immigration. “The governor supports the states’ rights to do this,” Gorka said. But does he support the substance of the law? “The governor supports the right of states.” Those were just the first few questions. “That’s all we’re going to say on this issue,” Gorka explained.
Alex Seitz-Wald is Salon's political reporter. Email him at aseitz-wald@salon.com, and follow him on Twitter @aseitzwald. More Alex Seitz-Wald.




Republican Virginia Lt. Governor Nominee: Obama Sees World "From A Muslim Perspective"
Rep. Issa Aware Of IRS Investigation Since Last July
French President Hollande Signs Marriage Equality Bill
Obama Group Braces For Progressive Backlash Over Keystone
Comments
6 Comments