Questions raised on Venezuela joining Mercosur
Topics: From the Wires, News
Venezuela's Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro, right, embraces Argentina's Foreign Minister Hector Timerman before the Mercosur summit in Mendoza, Argentina, Friday, June 29, 2012. Leaders of the Mercosur trade bloc agreed not to slap economic sanctions on Paraguay after the ousting of its president because they felt it would hurt the Paraguayan people. Mercosur leaders criticized the impeachment and barred ousted President Fernando Lugo's replacement, former Vice President Federico Franco, from attending the summit. (AP Photo/Natacha Pisarenko)(Credit: AP)BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — More than six years after Hugo Chavez first said joining Mercosur was Venezuela’s destiny, the presidents of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay decided last week that his oil-rich nation would finally become the fifth full member of the common market.
Venezuela holds the world’s largest crude oil reserves and the move potentially links the region’s top energy and agricultural suppliers.
But the decision at last week’s summit to welcome Venezuela into Mercosur after the leaders temporarily suspended Paraguay has brought questions about the move’s timing and legality. Such decisions must be unanimous under Mercosur rules, and Paraguay’s senate has long objected to Venezuela’s entry.
“Venezuela’s entry into Mercosur was carried out through an announcement … but there’s no legal or diplomatic protocol that guarantees its entry. There’s nothing in writing,” said Paraguay’s new foreign minister, Jose Felix Fernandez.
Fernandez assumed that post after President Fernando Lugo was impeached by Paraguay’s congress, which led other Mercosur countries to criticize the action as an “institutional coup” and suspend Paraguay’s membership.
Venezuela’s foreign minister, Nicolas Maduro, responded that his country has indeed achieved status as a full Mercosur member after years as an associate member. “Now the legal step will be taken,” he said.
Lugo had supported Venezuelan membership in Mercosur, but conservative Paraguayan lawmakers criticized Chavez as anti-democratic and opposed membership for Venezuela. Suspending Paraguay after Lugo’s quick impeachment trial removed the Paraguayan veto.
The full deal still needs to be signed July 31 at Mercosur’s next meeting in Rio de Janeiro. But despite vows of challenges in international courts by conservative lawmakers in Paraguay and Uruguay, some analysts say the move was legal — even if it was opportunistic.
“This was a decision that had the consent of three presidents,” said Antonio Jorge Ramalho, a professor of international relations at the University of Brasilia. “According to Mercosur statutes, decisions are taken by consensus within the bloc.”
Consensus has rarely been achieved within the group, which was founded in 1991 as a way of fostering open trade through shared customs rules. Despite that, Argentina and Brazil limit imports, leading the smaller Paraguay and Uruguay to accuse the regional powerhouses of protectionism.




Comments are not enabled for this story.