Call racism what it is
The racist language used by the Romney campaign has been sugar-coated
Topics: Feministing, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Republican Party, Race, Politics News
At the risk of sounding redundant, but again… enough with the race talk:
“We are part of an Anglo-Saxon heritage, and he feels that the special relationship is special,” the adviser said of Mr. Romney, adding: “The White House didn’t fully appreciate the shared history we have.”
Perhaps we can’t say it enough. I personally have made light of it, uncomfortable , sardonically swiping at the candidate and foot soldiers, noting ironically how this all boils down to resentment that there’s an African American in the White House.
But again, when thoughtless (yet tactical) racial animus comments like these are made in the presidential campaign, do we not call it what it is? To say ‘Anglo-Saxon heritage’ in this context is being esoterically cute and patently racist. It is. Don’t sugar coat it. Don’t couch it in false equivalencies. The language is racist. Coded to signal to me, American of African descent, that the identity of the Republican candidate for President is more vital than the actual policies and competency in governance for the nation.
Perhaps here for posterity’s sake, I’ll point to Nobel Laureate Toni Morrison’s definition of race talk from her 1993 Time Magazine article ‘On The Backs of Blacks’, just so we’re all clear about what race talk is:
‘the explicit insertion into everyday life of racial signs and symbols that have no meaning other than pressing African Americans to the lowest level of the racial hierarchy.’
To say Anglo Saxon is to say white and implicate the privilege and power that had been the norm in American life and history for nearly two centuries. And it’s a brilliant strategy. An anonymous off the record comment from a campaign source. The campaign doesn’t respond to the Telegraph’s inquiries if they wish to recant the story (they don’t). The language is nebulous, conditional, unaccountable – so wonderfully part of the language of corporate culture - ‘if’, ’anyone‘, ‘weren’t reflecting the views‘. If the candidate and leadership in the Romney camp thought this language shameful and damaging to Romney, the language of rebuke would take a clearer line, with usage of a definitive pronoun like ‘we‘ in lieu of ‘anyone‘. The spin doctors were at peak work last week, taking aim at Biden, for quoting a source they never corrected.





Obama Pledges Support To Moore, Oklahoma
What Will The "Game Change" Sequel Be About?
Fox News Involvement May Spark Republican Outrage Over Media Spying
Liberal Super PAC Had Secret Bain Ties
Comments
2 Comments