Oh no, the Democrats are “Kerry-izing” Romney
According to Politico, "Kerry-izing" means saying Mitt has no clue on foreign policy, not "lying about his record"
Topics: 2012 Elections, 2004 Elections, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Politico, Politics News
I would have thought an attempted “Kerry-ization” of a candidate — referring to the treatment of Sen. John Kerry by the Republicans and the press in 2004 — would involve a coordinated campaign of lies and misinformation, but according to Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei it just means “saying he doesn’t have a foreign policy.”
Allen and VandeHei, Politico’s mascot and co-founder, have yet another one of their bizarre, needlessly lengthy (especially needless because they just repeat the same points over and over again …) news articles that are also lengthy throat-clearing “state of the race” pieces that rehash the very obvious observations of D.C. reporters covering this race. (Some of these articles also double as opinion pieces about how mean and unfair the press and the Democrats are being to Mitt Romney.)
So, sure, it is at this point a truism that this election resembles 2004 in that the incumbent president has an advantage on “national security” issues and the challenger is perceived as rich and out of touch. So obviously the Democrats are now doing exactly what they accused the Other Side of doing, before:
In essence, many of the same Democrats who accused Republicans of playing politics with war in past elections are playing politics with it this time around.
O ho, Democrats! You used to complain that the president who fucked everything up kept calling his opponents anti-American, yet now you criticize Mitt Romney for refusing to ever mention the wars his Republican predecessor started and then fucked up! The shoe is on the other foot, or at least a shoe is on a foot.
Also John McCain has some advice for Romney that he should definitely listen to because John McCain’s foreign policy expertise is still a thing everyone acts like we should take seriously.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said in an interview that he thinks Romney should use his speech Tuesday to “go on the offensive — to point out that the president never mentions victory in Afghanistan, but talks about withdrawal. That has clearly encouraged the Taliban and extremists. The level of violence is up.”
Yes, Romney, accuse Obama of cutting and running and call for escalation in Afghanistan, that is definitely your ticket to victory.
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene.





Rick Perry Levels Targets With An AR-15 In His NRA Intro Video
FBI Soliciting Benghazi Tips With New Arabic-Language Video
Joe Biden Loves John McCain
Biden Promises Better Protection For American Embassies
Comments
19 Comments