In the New Yorker, Mitt being Mitt
A profile finds Romney "direct and pleasant and engaged"
Topics: Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Bain Capital, Welfare, 2012 Elections, News, Politics News
In this Sept. 23, 2012 file photo, Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney gets ready to board his campaign plane in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File) Mitt Romney is often seen awkwardly discussing tree heights and clouds when travelling on the campaign trail. But in an interview with Nicholas Lemann of the New Yorker, Romney comes across as somewhat more comfortable when discussing his business background.
In the profile, Lemann observes: “Just about the only thing in life that Mitt Romney is obviously not very good at is the public aspect of running for office. During his four campaigns for office–U.S. senator, in 1994; governor, in 2002; President, in 2008 and 2012– he must have undergone endless hours of training and practice, but the magic just isn’t there.” Except, that is, in smaller groups: “He was direct and pleasant and engaged. His voice sounded husky, rather than flat. His gestures seemed spontaneous, not staged.”
Here are some key qu0tes from the interview:
On his father:
“I remember, as a boy, saying to him, ‘Dad, we make the best cars, don’t we?’ And he said yes. And I said, ‘Then why don’t we sell the most cars?’ And he said, Well someday we may. And he said, ‘Because Mitt’–and this is a quote–’there’s nothing as vulnerable as entrenched success.’ And the auto industry, in particular General Motors, was so successful for so long that it didn’t recognize the need to innovate, to become more productive, to become more efficient, or it would ultimately be vulnerable to foreign competition. So the industry itself, its managers, made some critical mistakes.”
On business executives:
”They agree to actions which are good on a short-term basis but may be more hazardous long term. And so, for instance, if you’re the chief executive officer of General Motors back in the nineteen-seventies and a contract comes forward which has onerous legacy costs, why, you know that those costs are not going to be borne on your tern, because it’s going to be done for future retirees. And so you might agree to something that is harmful to the company long term but, by the way, beneficial short term, because who wants to take a strike, to prevent a provision that’s going to hurt ten years or twenty years down the road?”
Jillian Rayfield is an Assistant News Editor for Salon, focusing on politics. Follow her on Twitter at @jillrayfield or email her at jrayfield@salon.com. More Jillian Rayfield.




Ken Cuccinelli Once Filed An Amendment To Change Virginia's State Song To The Beatles' "Taxman"
Masters Of The Universe: Lawmakers Obsess Over Threats From Space
Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift

Comments
9 Comments