# In defense of Nate Silver — and basic math

## Pundits taking pot shots at the New York Times stats whiz need to take remedial math

• ### All Share Services

As a great philosopher once observed, “Math class is tough!”

This insight has been confirmed numerous times in the past few weeks, as various pundits have taken innumerate pot shots at Nate Silver, the New York Times blogger and author, who as of today estimates that President Obama has a 77.4 percent chance of winning reelection next week.

The Villager gossip site Politico has featured several criticisms from its stable of contributors, who in the great tradition of political journalism have not allowed their ignorance of a subject – in this case probability theory – to keep them from opining on it.

Behold the wit and wisdom of Josh Gerstein  and Dylan Byers: Gerstein asks, “Isn’t the basic problem with the Nate Silver prediction in question, and the critique, that it puts a percentage on a one-off event?”  Meanwhile, Byers concludes that, “should Mitt Romney win on Nov. 6, it’s difficult to see how people can continue to put faith in the predictions of someone who has never given that candidate anything higher than a 41 percent chance of winning.”

Clearly it’s time for some remedial stats classes.  Let’s start with a quick quiz.  Suppose a weather forecasting model predicts that the chance of rain in Chicago tomorrow is 75 percent.  How do we determine if the model produces accurate assessments of probabilities? After all, the weather in Chicago tomorrow, just like next week’s presidential election, is a “one-off event,” and after the event the probability that it rained will be either 100 percent or 0 percent.  (Indeed, all events that feature any degree of uncertainty are one-off events – or to put it another way, if an event has no unique characteristics it also features no uncertainties.)

### You Might Also Like

The answer is, the model’s accuracy can be assessed retrospectively over a statistically significant range of cases, by noting how accurate its probabilistic estimates are.  If, for example, this particular weather forecasting model predicted a 75 percent chance of rain on 100 separate days over the previous decade, and it rained on 75 of those days, then we can estimate the model’s accuracy in this regard as 100 percent.  This does not mean the model was “wrong” on those days when it didn’t rain, any more than it will mean Silver’s model is “wrong” if Romney were to win next week.

What Silver is predicting, in effect, is that as of today an election between a candidate with Obama’s level of support in the polls and one with Mitt Romney’s level of support in those polls would result in a victory for the former candidate in slightly more than three out of every four such elections.

This is a testable hypothesis, no different in kind from a weather forecast that predicts the chance of rain on particular days based on the available data (data that obviously become more reliable as the day in question approaches).  Presidential elections are much less common than rainy days, but elections in general are taking place all the time, and Silver’s track record in regard to evaluating the probability of election outcomes is excellent.

For complicated psychological reasons, human beings tend to prefer their intuitions to rational statistical analysis. Consider this (in)famous problem, which, despite its very straightforward answer, even many mathematically sophisticated people get wrong:

Suppose you’re on a game show and you’re given the choice of three doors. Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats.  After you have chosen a door, the door remains closed for the time being. The game show host, Monty Hall, who knows what is behind the doors, now has to open one of the two remaining doors, and the door he opens must have a goat behind it. After Monty Hall opens a door with a goat, he will ask you to decide whether you want to stay with your first choice or to switch to the last remaining door. Imagine that you chose Door 1 and the host opens Door 3, which has a goat. He then asks you “Do you want to switch to Door No. 2?” Is it to your advantage to change your choice?

I estimate there’s an 87 percent probability that Joe Scarborough wouldn’t switch to Door No. 2.

### Featured Slide Shows

• 1 of 11
• Close
• Fullscreen
• Thumbnails
Martyna Blaszczyk/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 1

Pond de l'Archeveche - hundreds thousands of padlocks locked to a bridge by random couples, as a symbol of their eternal love. After another iconic Pont des Arts bridge was cleared of the padlocks in 2010 (as a safety measure), people started to place their love symbols on this one. Today both of the bridges are full of love locks again.

Anders Andersson/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 2

A bird's view of tulip fields near Voorhout in the Netherlands, photographed with a drone in April 2015.

Aashit Desai/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 3

Angalamman Festival is celebrated every year in a small town called Kaveripattinam in Tamil Nadu. Devotees, numbering in tens of thousands, converge in this town the day after Maha Shivratri to worship the deity Angalamman, meaning 'The Guardian God'. During the festival some of the worshippers paint their faces that personifies Goddess Kali. Other indulge in the ritual of piercing iron rods throughout their cheeks.

Allan Gichigi/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 4

Kit Mikai is a natural rock formation about 40m high found in Western Kenya. She goes up the rocks regularly to meditate. Kit Mikai, Kenya

Chris Ludlow/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 5

On a weekend trip to buffalo from Toronto we made a pit stop at Niagara Falls on the Canadian side. I took this shot with my nexus 5 smartphone. I was randomly shooting the falls themselves from different viewpoints when I happened to get a pretty lucky and interesting shot of this lone seagull on patrol over the falls. I didn't even realize I had captured it in the shot until I went back through the photos a few days later

Jassen T./National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 6

Incredibly beautiful and extremely remote. Koehn Lake, Mojave Desert, California. Aerial Image.

Howard Singleton/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 7

Lucky timing! The oxpecker was originally sitting on hippo's head. I could see the hippo was going into a huge yawn (threat display?) and the oxpecker had to vacate it's perch. When I snapped the pic, the oxpecker appeared on the verge of being inhaled and was perfectly positioned between the massive gaping jaws of the hippo. The oxpecker also appears to be screeching in terror and back-pedaling to avoid being a snack!

Abrar Mohsin/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 8

The Yetis of Nepal - The Aghoris as they are called are marked by colorful body paint and clothes

Madeline Crowley/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 9

Taken from a zodiac raft on a painfully cold, rainy day

Ian Bird/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

#### National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

Slide 10

This wave is situated right near the CBD of Sydney. Some describe it as the most dangerous wave in Australia, due to it breaking on barnacle covered rocks only a few feet deep and only ten metres from the cliff face. If you fall off you could find yourself in a life and death situation. This photo was taken 300 feet directly above the wave from a helicopter, just as the surfer is pulling into the lip of the barrel.