NYT public editor calls out paper over Manning
"The Times should be there" at the pretrial hearings, argues Margaret Sullivan
Topics: The New York Times, Media Criticism, Bradley Manning, Fort Meade, pretrial hearing, News
Army Pfc. Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into a courthouse in Fort Meade (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky) The New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan Wednesday joined a chorus of voices criticizing her paper for failing to send reporters to Pfc. Bradley Manning’s pretrial hearings.
While the Times’ Washington Bureau chief David Leonhardt defended the decision to simply republish an AP wire on the proceedings, Sullivan took the Grey Lady to task. “The testimony is dramatic and the overarching issues are important,” she wrote.
Leonhardt told the public editor via email:
As with any other legal case, we won’t cover every single proceeding. In this case, doing so would have involved multiple days of a reporter’s time, for a relatively straightforward story. The A.P. article recounting the main points of Mr. Manning’s testimony about his conditions of confinement that ran on page A3 of The Times conveyed fundamentally the same material as a staff story would have.
However, as Times reader David Morf noted in a reprinted letter, using AP wire copy “let the story bury itself.” Following Sullivan’s piece, a number of commentators have taken issue with Leonhardt’s reference to “any other legal case,” since for many Manning’s treatment by the U.S. military and his role as a whistle-blower make his case exceptional.
Continue Reading CloseNatasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com. More Natasha Lennard.


Comments
5 Comments