SALON

Monday, Dec 10, 2012 7:32 PM UTC

Now’s not the time to raise the age of Medicare eligibility

It might save money for the budget, but not without crippling long-term consequences for our healthcare system

By , On the Economy

Topics: On the Economy, Jared Bernstein, Fiscal cliff, Medicare, Medicare Eligibility, Business, ,

Now's not the time to raise the age of Medicare eligibility (Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster)
This originally appeared on Jared Bernstein's blog, On the Economy.  

Cutting right to the chase, the cliff is almost upon us, and deciding big changes in social insurance programs — Medicare and Social Security, in particular — in this climate makes no sense. That includes both raising the Medicare eligibility age and the move to a chained CPI, which by dint of growing more slowly, would reduce Social Security benefits (and increase tax revenues … see here).

That doesn’t mean some changes, including cuts, shouldn’t be part of the cliff negotiations.  The president’s team, I think, could bring to the table around $400 billion in Medicare cuts over 10 years that largely come out of more efficient drug purchasing, other delivery side savings (paying for quality over quantity), and increase premiums on higher-income seniors.  Those look to me like smart savings and important negotiating material.

But bigger, structural changes, like raising the Medicare eligibility age or switching to the chained CPI, are more complex and deserve more discussion and debate.

Increasing the eligibility age for Medicare saves money for the budget.  But that’s no great policy feat – just kick some people off the rolls and boom, you’ve got some savings.   In fact, it raises costs for the larger system (see here), while potentially leaving 65-66-year-olds with a less access to affordable coverage.  That’s not “reform” — it’s a short-sighted attack on a critical, highly efficient program motivated not by efficiency, but by antipathy to social insurance.

The chained CPI switch makes more substantive sense, but it’s by no means a simple call.  It’s a more accurate price index, but it would constitute a benefit cut, and one that would really accumulate for older seniors.  For this reason, my CBPP colleagues (see first link above) argue for a benefit bump-up in the program for the older elderly.  I think it’s very unlikely that we can make that part of the negotiations over the next few weeks.  If there’s a part two to all of this that involves real tax and entitlement reform discussions next year, that’s the time to be getting into such significant structural changes.

Some advocates for retirees have suggested that if the goal is to switch Social Security to a more accurate price index, we should consider the CPI-E (“E” is for an experimental  index for the elderly).  This makes sense because the elderly really do face a different consumption market basket than the rest of us, with larger expenditure shares on medical care and housing, and less on, say, work-related costs, like transportation (see figure below).

The problem is that the “E” index is not computed as accurately as it should be, but the BLS could whip it into shape if Congress would provide the resources. (I don’t know how much, but a) we’re talking millions not billions, and b) it would pay for itself pretty quickly—the main problem is the sample of goods and their weights are not representative of the elderly’s expenditures.)

So, a smart way to go here is to pay the BLS to derive a more accurate price index for the elderly and then chain weight it.

Then, when we’re not under the pressure of a cliff-like deadline, we can consider whether some of these policy changes make sense.  To do so over the next couple of weeks would be extremely misguided with potentially large and long-term negative consequences.

Continue Reading Close

Jared Bernstein joined the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in May 2011 as a Senior Fellow. From 2009 to 2011, Bernstein was the Chief Economist and Economic Adviser to Vice President Joe Biden. Follow his work via Twitter at @econjared and @centeronbudget. More Jared Bernstein.

Next Article

Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

What To Read Awards: Top 10 Books of 2012 slide show

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 10
  • 10. "The Guardians" by Sarah Manguso: "Though Sarah Manguso’s 'The Guardians' is specifically about losing a dear friend to suicide, she pries open her intelligent heart to describe our strange, sad modern lives. I think about the small resonating moments of Manguso’s narrative every day." -- M. Rebekah Otto, The Rumpus

  • 9. "Beautiful Ruins" by Jess Walter: "'Beautiful Ruins' leads my list because it's set on the coast of Italy in 1962 and Richard Burton makes an entirely convincing cameo appearance. What more could you want?" -- Maureen Corrigan, NPR's "Fresh Air"

  • 8. "Arcadia" by Lauren Groff: "'Arcadia' captures our painful nostalgia for an idyllic past we never really had." -- Ron Charles, Washington Post

  • 7. "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn: "When a young wife disappears on the morning of her fifth wedding anniversary, her husband becomes the automatic suspect in this compulsively readable thriller, which is as rich with sardonic humor and social satire as it is unexpected plot twists." -- Marjorie Kehe, Christian Science Monitor

  • 6. "How Should a Person Be" by Sheila Heti: "There was a reason this book was so talked about, and it’s because Heti has tapped into something great." -- Jason Diamond, Vol. 1 Brooklyn

  • 4. TIE "NW" by Zadie Smith and "Far From the Tree" by Andrew Solomon: "Zadie Smith’s 'NW' is going to enter the canon for the sheer audacity of the book’s project." -- Roxane Gay, New York Times "'Far From the Tree' by Andrew Solomon is, to my mind, a life-changing book, one that's capable of overturning long-standing ideas of identity, family and love." -- Laura Miller, Salon

  • 3. "Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk" by Ben Fountain: "'Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk' says a lot about where we are today," says Marjorie Kehe of the Christian Science Monitor. "Pretty much the whole point of that novel," adds Time's Lev Grossman.

  • 2. "Bring Up the Bodies" by Hilary Mantel: "Even more accomplished than the preceding novel in this sequence, 'Wolf Hall,' Mantel's new installment in the fictionalized life of Thomas Cromwell -- master secretary and chief fixer to Henry VIII -- is a high-wire act, a feat of novelistic derring-do." -- Laura Miller, Salon

  • 1. "Behind the Beautiful Forevers" by Katherine Boo: "Like the most remarkable literary nonfiction, it reads with the bite of a novel and opens up a corner of the world that most of us know absolutely nothing about. It stuck with me all year." -- Eric Banks, president of the National Book Critics Circle

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 10

Related Videos

More Related Stories

Comments

 5 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( profile | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>

follow salon

Most Read

From Around the Web

Recommendations