Two ways of looking at robots
Influential technologists weigh in on the rise of the machines
Topics: technology, robots, Keith Kelly, Wired, MarketPlace, Business, Technology News, Business News, News
Who welcomes our new robot overlords?
This week brings two radically different perspectives on how robots are changing the world. Marketplace quotes Jaan Tallinn, an Estonian programmer who helped develop Skype, on the dangers of self-replicating technology: “Once we have something that is no longer under control” says Tallinn, “once technological development is yanked out of our hands, it doesn’t have to continue to be beneficial to humans.”
Machines which we can’t control, which sounds a lot like the grey goo problem, is just one of the topics that will be studied at Cambridge University’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, an organization co-founded by Tallinn to examine threats to the continuing existence of humanity.
Tallinn explains:
Humanity is seriously under-invested in them. For example, we’re spending more money in lipstick research than we are in making sure that we survive this century as a species. Worrying about long-term issues is definitely something that very few people are doing. Therefore my time and my money can actually make a big difference in that area.
A sunnier take comes on the cover of Wired’s January issue. Kevin Kelly, the magazine’s “senior maverick” has an article subtitled “Robots are coming to take our jobs. We should be happy about it.” He writes “70 percent of today’s occupations will likewise be replaced by automation. Yes, dear reader even you will have your job taken away by machines. In other words robot replacement is just a matter of time.” Sidebars in the article go on to describe how automatons are usurping professions as diverse as musician, cop, therapist, comedian, artist, teacher, waiter, athlete, nurse and more.
Continue Reading CloseAlex Halperin is news editor at Salon. You can follow him on Twitter @alexhalperin. More Alex Halperin.




Comments
4 Comments