Will Armstrong come clean?
The disgraced cyclist plans to sit down with Oprah — and hints that he may reveal more about the doping allegations
Topics: Lance Armstrong, Livestrong, Oprah Winfrey, Tour de France, Doping, James Frey, Editor's Picks, Entertainment News
Oh, this is going to be good. Lance Armstrong, America’s favorite cyclist/cancer survivor/alleged epic doper has revealed he is going to speak the most openly – and at length – he has since being stripped of his seven Tour de France wins and banned from competition last August. If you’re watching, you might want to stock up on Gatorade because this is an endurance event – his first interview is going to be 90-minute sit-down with (arm flourish) Opraaaaaaaah Winfreeeeeeeeeey.
On her site, Winfrey and company promise the interview, airing next week, will be “no-holds-barred” — and that “Armstrong will address the alleged doping scandal, years of accusations of cheating, and charges of lying about the use of performance-enhancing drugs throughout his storied cycling career.” Last week, the New York Times laid the groundwork for what he might reveal, with the news that “he is considering publicly admitting that he used banned performance-enhancing drugs and blood transfusions during his cycling career.” The Times says rumor has it Armstrong is mulling an admission in the hopes of an eventual reinstatement for competition – a career move that the 41-year-old realistically doesn’t have a whole lot of time left to make.
It’s all clearly a very calculated informational rollout. After the many, many passionate denials of doping that Armstrong issued throughout his career, if there’s to be a change in his story, it makes sense he’d do everything he can to control the message. First, there’s the well-placed leak from “people familiar with the situation” to the biggest source possible: the Times. Then there’s the inevitable lengthy, in-depth interview with a beloved icon. It’s a long, cautious road back to public trust.
It’s bound to make for fascinating television, not merely because of Armstrong, who just months ago was self-aggrandizingly calling the USADA’s process “an unconstitutional witch hunt.” What will make it compelling viewing is O herself, a woman who historically does not just sit on the couch and make meaningful nodding gestures. If there’s a story, Oprah will inevitably insert herself right into it in her Oprah way.
Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub. More Mary Elizabeth Williams.




Comments
5 Comments