Counterterror rulebook exempts drone war
The manual on targeted killing includes no guidelines for drone attacks in Pakistan
Topics: Drones, Pakistan, John Brennan, Counterterrorism, Disposition Matrix, Washington Post, CIA, counterterrorism playbook, Technology News, News, Politics News
As part of its continuing series on the Obama administration’s targeted killing program, the Washington Post reported Saturday that a proposed manual of rules for counterterrorism programs is near completion. However, according to the Post, the manual “leaves open a major exemption for the CIA’s campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan, U.S. officials said.”
In previous reports about the proposed Manual, the Post’s Miller noted that the codification of kill lists and other current counterterror practices into a manual illustrates that programs once considered emergency post-9/11 measures have been crystallized as permanent fixtures of our national security apparatus. Miller, Ellen Nakashima and Karen DeYoung repeated this point Saturday:
The adoption of a formal guide to targeted killing marks a significant — and to some uncomfortable — milestone: the institutionalization of a practice that would have seemed anathema to many before the Sept. 11 , 2001, terrorist attacks… Critics see the manual as a symbol of the extent to which the targeted killing program has become institutionalized, part of an apparatus being assembled by the Obama administration to sustain a seemingly permanent war.
Among the subjects covered in the playbook are the process for adding names to kill lists, the legal principles that govern when U.S. citizens can be targeted overseas and the sequence of approvals required when the CIA or U.S. military conducts drone strikes outside war zones.
The decision to exempt CIA drone strikes in Pakistan from the manual (an exemption expected to last over a year) was, officials said, “a compromise that allowed officials to move forward with other parts of the playbook” after “disagreements among the State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon on the criteria for lethal strikes and other issues.”
Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com. More Natasha Lennard.





No Evidence FBI Is Targeting Chechen Separatists In Boston Bombing Case, Advocates Say
Bill De Blasio Won't Be Distracted By Anthony Weiner
State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
Life As A Google Glass Photographer
The Problem With Streaming Albums On iTunes
Bringing Back "Arrested Development" Might Ruin It
The Ethics Of OkCupid Lurking
Instagram Is Not Mass Deleting User Accounts
7 stories to read this weekend
Report: Google wants to connect the developing world with wireless
VMware’s revolving door keeps on spinning
Australian researchers get closer to scalable quantum computing
Steering clear of the iceberg: three ways we can fix the data-credibilty crisis in science

Comments
4 Comments