NRA’s Wayne LaPierre: Obama wants to take away “God-given freedoms”

The NRA's executive vice president responded to the President's inauguration speech

Topics: Wayne LaPierre, Barack Obama, 2013 Presidential Inauguration, Gun Control, Newtown school shooting,

NRA's Wayne LaPierre: Obama wants to take away "God-given freedoms" (Credit: AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

The NRA’s executive vice president Wayne LaPierre responded to President Obama’s inauguration speech by accusing him of trying to take away guns and freedom, and reducing the Constitution to “a blank slate for anyone’s graffiti.”

Speaking in Reno at the annual Weatherby International Hunting and Conservation Awards on Tuesday, LaPierre latched on to a line from Obama’s speech in which the President argued: ”We cannot afford to mistake absolutism for principle.”

“Absolutes do exist, it’s the basis of all civilization,” said LaPierre. “Without those absolutes, Democracy decays into nothing more than two wolves and one lamb voting on who to eat for lunch.”

“When ‘absolutes’ are abandoned for ‘principles,’ the U.S. Constitution becomes a blank slate for anyone’s graffiti and our rights and freedoms are defaced,” he argued.

“They are God-given freedoms. They belong to us in the United States of America as our birthright. No government gave them to us and no government can ever take them away,” LaPierre said, adding: “We believe that we deserve and have every right to the same level of freedom that government leaders reserve for themselves — to defend ourselves and our families with semi-automatic firearms technology.”

And, as the Huffington Post points out:



LaPierre quoted former Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, a one-time Democratic congressman who served on the high court in the 1930s. “Justice Black understood the danger of self-appointed arbiters of what freedom really means, like President Obama,” LaPierre said.

But Black is a problematic hero for LaPierre. In 1939, Black and fellow Supreme Court justices ruled unanimously in a landmark gun control case, United States v. Miller, that the Second Amendment does not protect blanket access for citizens to any type of firearm.

You can read LaPierre’s full set of remarks here.

Jillian Rayfield is an Assistant News Editor for Salon, focusing on politics. Follow her on Twitter at @jillrayfield or email her at jrayfield@salon.com.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 7
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Dinah Fried

    Famous literary meals

    "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" by Hunter S. Thompson

    Dinah Fried

    Famous literary meals

    "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll

    Dinah Fried

    Famous literary meals

    "Moby Dick" by Herman Melville

    Dinah Fried

    Famous literary meals

    "The Bell Jar" by Sylvia Plath

    Dinah Fried

    Famous literary meals

    "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger

    Famous literary meals

    "The Metamorphosis" by Franz Kafka

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>