Judges learn it’s human to have feelings on bench
Topics: From the Wires, News, Politics News
This photo taken Feb. 6, 2013 shows Terry Maroney, professor of Law at Vanderbilt Law School, posing for a photograph at the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building in Washington. A Florida judge's harsh reaction to a disrespectful teenaged defendant, captured on court video, was a reminder that judges don't shed their emotions when they don their black robes. "We tell judges, 'If you ever detect an emotion, squelch it.' That's an extremely bad idea," says Maroney, who led a session for roughly 40 judges in Washington that incorporated the incident. "You're going to have emotions as a judge no matter how many people tell you won't or aren't supposed to." (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)(Credit: AP)WASHINGTON (AP) — A Florida judge’s harsh reaction to a disrespectful teenage defendant, captured on court video, was a reminder that judges don’t shed their emotions when they don their black robes.
The recent episode quickly went viral. But for a few dozen new federal judges, it became a lesson in finding ways to acknowledge they experience a range of feelings on the bench and to channel them appropriately.
“We tell judges, ‘If you ever detect an emotion, squelch it.’ That’s an extremely bad idea,” said Vanderbilt University law professor Terry Maroney, who led a session for roughly 40 judges in Washington that incorporated the Florida incident. “You’re going to have emotions as a judge, no matter how many people tell you you won’t or aren’t supposed to.”
In a Miami-Dade County courtroom, Circuit Judge Jorge Rodriguez-Chomat doubled an 18-year-old’s bond when she laughed, then gave her 30 days in jail when she made an obscene gesture with her middle finger.
Several days later, she admitted she had been high on Xanax and alcohol and apologized to the judge. He erased the bond and let her go home.
U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel, who runs the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, said a judge’s first year can be especially intense, and Maroney’s aim is to help judges cope with the new stresses of the job, including the difficult task of sending another human being to prison.
“We don’t do a lot to prepare them for that. Judges, when they’re new, try particularly hard to live up to the expectations of the job. As you have more time and more experience, you realize you are not going to get it right every time. You have an obligation to try, but you can’t, because we’re all imperfect. It takes a while to come to terms with that,” said Fogel, a veteran of 30 years as a judge in state and federal courts in California.
The discussion in Washington was held behind closed doors, but Fogel and two new judges agreed to talk about it and about their experiences on the bench.
U.S. District Judge John Gerard in Lincoln, Neb., served as a state Supreme Court justice for 16 years, hearing appeals generally argued in measured tones and in a sterile environment, at least compared to a courtroom trial. President Barack Obama nominated him to the federal judiciary in 2011, and he began his new job a year ago.
Among the most difficult situations Gerard has encountered involved white-collar fraud.




French President Hollande Signs Marriage Equality Bill
Obama Group Braces For Progressive Backlash Over Keystone
Republican Lawmakers Took IRS Union Campaign Cash

Comments
0 Comments