Julie Carr Smyth
Ohio court spars with lawyers in school Bible case
Judges and lawyers debate if a public school science teacher had the right to push his religious beliefs in class
FILE - In this April 16, 2008 file photo, John Freshwater, center, addresses a crowd on Mount Vernon's public square in Mount Vernon, Ohio. The Ohio Supreme Court is ready to hear arguments in the case of Freshwater, a fired public school science teacher who kept a bible on his desk and was accused of preaching religious beliefs in class. (AP Photo/Mount Vernon News, Pam Schehl, File) (Credit: AP)COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — In a heated hour of arguments, Ohio Supreme Court justices sparred with lawyers Wednesday over the extent to which a now-fired public school science teacher had the right to push his personal religious beliefs in class.
A lawyer for the school board that dismissed John Freshwater in 2011 said he waved a Bible at his students, handed out religious pamphlets and espoused creationism in his evolution lessons.
Freshwater violated the constitutional separation between church and state and was rightfully fired, said David Smith, an attorney for the Mount Vernon School Board.
“You can’t teach evolution from a Christian perspective” without violating constitutional protections against government establishment of religion, he said.
Freshwater’s attorney, Rita Dunaway, said accounts of Freshwater’s class conduct were exaggerated and that the instructor was exercising his academic freedom to explore controversial ideas.
“A Bible on a desk hidden amongst other clutter does not a religious display make,” she said.
Dunaway said Freshwater had a laudable teaching record and his students scored well on standardized science tests.
Freshwater was dismissed in 2011 after investigators reported he preached Christian beliefs in class when discussing topics such as evolution and homosexuality and was insubordinate in failing to remove the Bible from his classroom.
Justices appeared perplexed, at times irritated, about what lawyers believed was the legal issue before them.
Justice Paul Pfeifer was incredulous when Smith argued that Freshwater’s evolution class wouldn’t have been covered under the school district’s controversial-issues policy.
“So there’s nothing controversial about evolution. It is a theory, isn’t it?” he said.
Freshwater also had been accused of using a science tool to burn students’ arms with the image of a cross, but that allegation was resolved and was not a factor in his firing.
Justices wanted to know Wednesday whether that incident played a role in Freshwater’s dismissal. Smith speculated that attention surrounding that incident was what prompted the school board’s investigation into Freshwater’s 21-year career.
In its review, the board concluded Freshwater had used a high-frequency generator, which other teachers have used to demonstrate electrical current, to burn a cross onto a student’s arm. The cross lasted a few weeks.





25 Awesome Swimsuit DIYs You Have To Try This Summer
38 Perfect Books To Read Aloud With Kids
5 Home Depot Hacks

Comments
22 Comments