BP exec back on the stand in oil spill trial
Topics: From the Wires, News
Lamar McKay, former president of BP America and current chief executive of BP's Upstream unit, leaves Federal Court after testifying in New Orleans, Monday, Feb. 25, 2013. McKay testified Tuesday that BP and its contractors share responsibility for preventing blowouts like the Macondo well blowout and rig explosion off Louisiana that killed 11 workers on April 20, 2010, spawning the massive spill. (AP Photo/Bill Haber)(Credit: AP)NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Another BP executive was expected on the witness stand Thursday to face more questions from attorneys for the U.S. government, which is trying to prove the oil company is mostly to blame for a deadly explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig that led to a massive oil spill.
Mark Bly led the company’s internal probe of its 2010 blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, but said the investigation wasn’t intended to look at the disaster through the “lens of responsibility.”
“I think people should share information that could help learn about accidents,” Bly said.
Attorneys for the U.S. government and lawyers for Gulf Coast residents and businesses have accused BP of putting profits ahead of safety on a project that was over budget and behind schedule. BP has said drilling in the Gulf is a team effort and its partners should share in the responsibility for the disaster. The trial is designed to assess the fault of each company involved, and billions of dollars are at stake.
On Wednesday, a well design expert and geophysicist who worked for Conoco and Exxon, said BP withheld critical information from oil and gas regulators and continued drilling despite clear signs of trouble before the blowout of the Macondo well.
Alan Huffman, the federal government’s expert, said BP continued drilling in dangerous deep water conditions without keeping the Minerals Management Service fully informed about changes in its plans.
Huffman said his review of internal BP documents and MMS records showed the London-based oil giant engaged in a “consistent pattern of misreporting” to the federal agency and gave it a “very false impression” of what was happening on the drilling project.
“And this happened on multiple occasions … not just on one or two,” said Huffman, the second expert witness at a trial that started Monday and, barring a settlement, could last several months.
During his cross-examination, Huffman acknowledged he had never been asked to make a similar comparison of regulatory records before the Justice Department hired him.
“Are you in the business of determining whether or not regulations have been violated?” BP attorney Matt Regan asked.
“That is not my normal practice of work, no,” Huffman said.
Regan also questioned why Huffman didn’t thoroughly examine the actions of Transocean rig workers or compare BP’s conduct to that of other offshore operators.




Comments
0 Comments