Emails emerge in Woodward threat-gate

Bob Woodward says a W.H. aide threatened him after his comments on the sequester. The emails suggest something else

Topics: Bob Woodward, sequester, Barack Obama, Gene Sperling, Media,

Emails emerge in Woodward threat-gateBob Woodward (Credit: AP/Alex Brandon)

A series of newly leaked emails between veteran reporter Bob Woodward and White House aide Gene Sperling cast into question Woodward’s claim that the White House threatened him over his comments on the sequester.

Last week, Woodward wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post blaming the president for the sequester, arguing that it’s “madness” for Obama to allow the cuts to go into effect, and saying that the original sequester deal required that it only be replaced with spending cuts.

The White House disputed this characterization, with Jay Carney responding that it was never mandated that the sequester be replaced with only spending cuts, and “To suggest otherwise is willfully wrong.”

In another appearance on Wednesday, Woodward told CNN that a White House aide threatened him via email over the comments, suggesting Woodward would ”regret” his claims about the sequester. The aide was later confirmed to be Gene Sperling, an economic adviser to Obama. On Thursday, Politico obtained and published the emails in question.

Here’s the key part of Sperling’s email:

But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really.

And Woodward’s response:

You Might Also Like

Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob

The full emails can be read here.

Jillian Rayfield is an Assistant News Editor for Salon, focusing on politics. Follow her on Twitter at @jillrayfield or email her at

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R.,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>