Aaron Swartz’s grand jury: State-enforced betrayal
Writer Quinn Norton's painful account of accidentally betraying her friend is a lesson in grand jury manipulation
Topics: Aaron Swartz, quinn norton, Grand Jury, cybercrime, federal prosecutors, stephen heymann, The Atlantic, Technology News, News
When journalist Quinn Norton was presented with a subpoena in 2011 to appear in front of a federal grand jury, she “had to Google grand jury to find out what it was.” She did not know that in a small, closed hearing, federal prosecutors would push her to inadvertently help incriminate her dearest friend and then-lover — Aaron Swartz.
I have written at some length about how federal grand juries have been used as fishing expeditions to indict activists, breeding distrust and despair around those investigated or called as witnesses. Norton’s essay published in the Atlantic Monday on being a “reluctant witness” in the federal prosecution against Swartz bears out this point with a painful and important personal account.
Norton details the mind-set that had her agree to cooperate with the government’s questioning (“the mechanics of snitching”) with little understanding of what her testimony might mean for Swartz’s case:
I didn’t know anything the prosecution cared about, and I thought that maybe I could talk Steve [Heymann, the lead prosecutor] out of the prosecution, or at least into not being so harsh. This was so obviously a ridiculous application of justice, I thought. If I just had the chance to explain, maybe this would all go away. My lawyers told me this was possible. They nursed this idea. They told me Steve wanted to meet me, and they wanted me to meet him. They wanted to set up something called a proffer — a kind of chat with the prosecution.
Norton recounts how the more she learned about this proffer, the more she regretted agreeing to it. As I have written before, non-cooperation with a grand jury is possible but carries great risk. Despite the fact that witnesses are offered immunity from criminal prosecution — and thus self-indictment — if they refuse to talk they can be held in federal custody for 18 months or more for contempt. Two anarchists in the Pacific Northwest on Friday were released from federal detention having refused to talk to a grand jury when subpoenaed — they had been imprisoned for five months for their silence, kept for long periods in solitary confinement. For Norton, the mother of a 7-year-old girl, the risk loomed large.
Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com. More Natasha Lennard.




The 16 Most Popular Tumblrs
The Real Reason Yahoo Is Buying Tumblr
Yahoo's Board Approves $1.1 Billion Purchase Of Tumblr
New York Times CEO calls digital pay model “most successful” decision in years
Armed with Android app support, Jolla’s €399 phone launches by year-end
Yahoo officially acquires Tumblr for $1.1 billion, promises “not to screw it up”
Exclusive: Dropbox seeks partners to convert free users to paying customers

Comments
6 Comments