Ten years of Iraq War films: Why audiences shunned movies about Mideast
At the 10-year anniversary of the Iraq War, there has been no war film that captured the public imagination
Topics: The Hurt Locker, Kathryn Bigelow, Zero Dark Thirty, lions for lambs, in the valley of elah, Rendition, Entertainment News
In the 10 years since the Iraq War began on March 19, 2003, there have been a preponderance of films about the conflict in the Middle East. 2007 alone saw the release of “In the Valley of Elah,” which depicted post-traumatic stress disorder among Iraq veterans; “Redacted,” about the slaughter of civilians; “Lions for Lambs,” about government pro-war propaganda; and “Rendition,” about U.S. torture practices.
All of them were, for lack of a better word, bombs, and failed to capture the public imagination. (When’s the last time you heard of someone streaming “In the Valley of Elah” on Netflix?)
Even “The Hurt Locker,” Kathryn Bigelow’s 2009 opus about an American bomb squad, struggled to find an audience until it swept the Academy Awards; it was the lowest-grossing film ever to take the best picture Oscar. Much like foreign coverage of Iraq as the wars dragged on, “The Hurt Locker” was largely ignored.
While after the Vietnam War, movies like “Apocalypse Now” and “The Deer Hunter” drew audiences and defined the national conversation, and jingoistic World War II films were the vogue throughout the 1940s, films about the current conflict in the Middle East have failed to find much of an audience. Even “Act of Valor,” last year’s smash hit military recruitment film-cum-action flick intended to allure potential Navy SEALs, steered clear of the Persian Gulf, with set pieces in Costa Rica and Ukraine.
“I think it’s very simple,” said film historian David Thomson, the author most recently of “The Big Screen: The Story of the Movies.” “People did not like the war. They did not believe in the war.
“In general, I don’t think audiences like war films about wars that are still going on. The only exception to this is that with the Second World War, where there was an exceptional feeling of purpose and patriotic duty.” The years between 2005 and 2007 were long enough after war’s outbreak that a logistically complicated film might have been made but not nearly long enough that the war was digested by the American public and ready to be made the subject of art; meanwhile, 2010′s Matt Damon film “Green Zone” felt like old news after seven grinding years of war.
Daniel D'Addario is a staff reporter for Salon's entertainment section. Follow him on Twitter @DPD_ More Daniel D'Addario.




Comments
21 Comments