S.E. Cupp is wrong on marriage, but not why you might think
The conservative commentator and I disagree on gay marriage. It's her promotion of it that I find worrying VIDEO
By Sally KohnTopics: Video, S.E. Cupp, MSNBC, Marriage equality, Conservatives, LGBT, LGBT Rights, Entertainment News, Politics News
As if we needed further evidence of the malleable nature of ideology, this week conservative pundit S.E. Cupp responded to my critique of conservative “marriage promotion” arguments for supporting gay marriage by defending the cause of marriage equality:
Here’s what I wrote in my original Salon essay:
In the interest of expediency and bringing as many unlikely conservative allies on board, the gay rights movement may give cover to or even amplify a set of narrow values that rank married families as better than unmarried families, two parents as better than one parent — norms that continue to divide America into good people and deserving families versus everyone else. And even if we temporarily succeed in getting gay folks added to the “good” category, is it worth it? Plus do we really think that’s the way we or anyone else will be treated equally?
To which Cupp responded, in substance:
The argument that Kohn dismisses, that married families are better than unmarried families, is one that many conservatives advocating for gay marriage (and gay adoption for similar reasons) may not have expected they’d need to defend. In fact, it would seem counterintuitive that a group demanding marriage rights for so long would have some within its ranks making the case that marriage either isn’t the end game at all or isn’t an institution they even truly value.As a conservative who has long defended gay rights, I fear that this is where we may have a problem. While I, along with others on my side of the aisle, also make the libertarian, limited government argument, we deeply believe that defending gay marriage is defending marriage itself, as an institution that creates economic stability, decreases reliance on the state and provides a better environment for children than single parenthood. Economic data support these beliefs.
Now, for the record, Cupp also notes that she knows me to be “smart and thoughtful.” I feel precisely the same about Cupp. Even in an era of hyperpartisanship, it is still possible to have profound and provocative disagreements while maintaining civility. I hope our exchange is a good example of this.
So what’s my response to Cupp’s response? First of all, I’m in a long-term committed relationship with a child, so I’m certainly not knocking marriage or two-parent families. In fact, having kids is so much work I start to understand the practical appeal of polygamy! But at the same time, I know many extraordinary single parents — either by circumstance or by choice — and I know many truly awful couples who I don’t think should be trusted with a hamster let alone children. Many of the over 6 million children every year who are sexually abused in the United States live with two parents. Many incredibly happy, well-adjusted and productive members of society were raised by just one parent, the current president of the United States of America among them.
I believe anyone who wants to get married should be able to get married. What I do not believe is that our government should privilege certain people and certain families based on whether they choose to marry or not.
Cupp references “economic data” that marriage is better, presumably echoing the conservative myth that marriage helps alleviate poverty. Of course, the fact is that while there is no conclusive evidence that marriage helps lift people, especially women, out of poverty, there is plenty of evidence that things like living wage laws and unions help alleviate poverty. So why aren’t conservatives pushing those?
I’m not accusing Cupp of being disingenuous. I believe her desire to promote equality and fairness for gay people is authentic and deep, as it is for many conservatives and libertarians. What I am expressing is a fear that many conservatives are trying to use the wave of popular support for gay marriage as a way to reinforce regressive values about families and sexuality that implicitly still allows gay people (and others) to be ranked second-class or worse. We should not allow the cause of gay marriage to be used to suggest that certain kinds of families are better than others. All families must be treated fairly and equally.
Cupp writes:
If her project is to move the country not toward inclusive marriage rights, but beyond marriage altogether, I am one gay rights advocate who is willing to say, I’m not with you.
But I don’t want to move “beyond marriage.” I simply don’t want to be limited to marriage, for marriage to constrain the rights and equality of the wide variety of American families.
Related Stories
More Related Stories
-
The persistence of Carson Daly: How an MTV personality became face of "The Voice"
-
Pick of the week: I was a teenage anarchist!
-
Send her your sexts
-
Lil Wayne responds to family of Emmett Till over offensive lyric
-
Steven Spielberg to direct "American Sniper" film adaptation
-
"The Shelter Cycle": Raised in a cult
-
Google Earth as art
-
"Iron Man 3" box office hit in China
-
"Iron Man 3": A playboy grows up
-
Reese Witherspoon on arrest: "I literally panicked"
-
Listen to the soundtrack of Baz Luhrmann's "Great Gatsby"
-
Spice Girls musical closing in June
-
Performers announced for Billboard Awards
-
Must-see morning clip: Colbert on over-the-counter Plan B
-
Chris Kelly of rap group Kris Kross dies at 34
-
"The Americans'" creators discuss the season finale
-
"Mad Men" recapped via Facebook updates
-
Salman Rushdie: Artists are more vulnerable than ever
-
Tale of lost Vietnam vet reunited with family in "Unclaimed" deemed false
-
John Oliver to guest-host "Daily Show" starting June 10
-
"Downton Abbey" casts first black character
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 pics
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
This photo. President Barack Obama has a laugh during the unveiling of the George W. Bush Presidential Center in Dallas, Tx., Thursday. Former first lady Barbara Bush, who candidly admitted this week we've had enough Bushes in the White House, is unamused.
Reuters/Jason Reed -
Rescue workers converge Wednesday in Savar, Bangladesh, where the collapse of a garment building killed more than 300. Factory owners had ignored police orders to vacate the work site the day before.
AP/A.M. Ahad -
Police gather Wednesday at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to honor campus officer Sean Collier, who was allegedly killed in a shootout with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects last week.
AP/Elise Amendola -
Police tape closes the site of a car bomb that targeted the French embassy in Libya Tuesday. The explosion wounded two French guards and caused extensive damage to Tripoli's upscale al-Andalus neighborhood.
AP/Abdul Majeed Forjani -
Protestors rage outside the residence of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Sunday following the rape of a 5-year-old girl in New Delhi. The girl was allegedly kidnapped and tortured before being abandoned in a locked room for two days.
AP/Manish Swarup -
Clarksville, Mo., residents sit in a life boat Monday after a Mississippi River flooding, the 13th worst on record.
AP/Jeff Roberson -
Workers pause Wednesday for a memorial service at the site of the West, Tx., fertilizer plant explosion, which killed 14 people and left a crater more than 90 feet wide.
AP/The San Antonio Express-News, Tom Reel -
Aerial footage of the devastation following a 7.0 magnitude earthquake in China's Sichuan province last Saturday. At least 180 people were killed and as many as 11,000 injured in the quake.
AP/Liu Yinghua -
On Wednesday, Hazmat-suited federal authorities search a martial arts studio in Tupelo, Miss., once operated by Everett Dutschke, the newest lead in the increasingly twisty ricin case. Last week, President Barack Obama, Sen. Roger Wicker, R.-Miss., and a Mississippi judge were each sent letters laced with the deadly poison.
AP/Rogelio V. Solis -
The lighting of Freedom Hall at the George W. Bush Presidential Center Thursday is celebrated with (what else but) red, white and blue fireworks.
AP/David J. Phillip -
Recent Slide Shows
-
The week in 10 pics
-
"Arrested Development" character posters
-
Photos of the Boston manhunt
-
Newspaper headlines covering the Boston explosion
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
Related Videos
Most Read
-
71 names so awful New Zealand had to ban them
Kyle Kim, GlobalPost
-
He made me his drug mule
Alix Wall
-
Is Michael Pollan a sexist pig?
Emily Matchar
-
Pictures of people who mock me
Haley Morris-Cafiero
-
GOP creates Ted Cruz, now thinks he's a jerk
Alex Pareene
-
"This could be a career ender for Michele Bachmann"
Alex Seitz-Wald
-
The Internet blew my mind
Michael Santos, The Daily Dot
-
Ted Cruz will never be president
Joan Walsh
-
Claire Messud to Publishers Weekly: "What kind of question is that?"
David Daley
-
Glenn Beck's favorite immigrants
Sally Kohn
Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
-
Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift - Who Said It: Terry McAuliffe Or A Character From "House Of Cards"?
- State Department Unsure Of Status Of Saudi Diplomat In Alleged Trafficking Investigation
-
United Nations Says $22,000 Internship Up For Auction Isn't Legitimate -
National Review Photoshops Grover Norquist Out Of Marco Rubio Cover





Comments
38 Comments