Study: We’ll lose weight for dough
New research suggests that cash incentives may be the best way to lose pounds -- and slow companies' health costs
Topics: Pacific Standard, Weight Loss, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Life News
Trying to hit the gym and shed that winter insulation? With bikini season just around the corner, weight loss seems to be—once again—the water-cooler topic du jour. And for employers and health insurers both, that’s good news.
Encouraging workers to get a little competitive on the elliptical by offering them cash incentives may be the best way to help them lose pounds—and to slow companies’ spiraling health care costs.
That’s what researchers from Michigan and Pennsylvania discovered when they implemented a dollars-for-dieters program among the medical staff at Philadelphia’s Children’s Hospital.
Each participant was given a monthly weight-loss goal, based on his or her body-mass index, and assigned to one of two cohorts.
Members of the “individual incentive” cohort were eligible to win 100 dollars for every month that they hit their goal; if they fell short, the hospital simply kept the money.
Members of the “group incentive” cohort were given similar terms, but with a lucrative twist: they were “competing” against a pool of four other employees for a guaranteed 500-dollar payout. If all five workers in the pool hit their goals, they each received 100 bucks; but if, say, only two in five did, the victors got to split the pot and take home 250 dollars apiece. “Group” participants, in other words, could win as much as 500 bucks if their pool-mates fell short. But sneak too many Ding-Dongs, and they would have to watch their cash go to someone else.
Both strategies cost the hospital the same amount of money to implement. But they differed dramatically in their results.
“Individual” participants, competing only against themselves, lost an average of 3.7 pounds in six months; 12 weeks later, they’d regained half that weight. “Group” participants, meanwhile, motivated by the possibility of a jackpot payout, lost an average of 10.6 pounds, and had far better success at keeping the weight off.
“We were surprised that the individual incentive was not more effective,” lead author Jeffrey Kullgren, of the University of Michigan, told me. He and his colleagues, who published their findings this month in the Annals of Internal Medicine, had imagined that 100 dollars would be more than enough to motivate better eating habits. Instead, he says, “individual” participants fared little better than a control group, which was given minimal counseling and no cash incentive.






45 Cozy Cabins You'll Want To Hide Away In Forever
Comments
5 Comments