Obama says Gitmo should be closed
In briefing, president vows to "reengage with Congress" to change detention policy. Also discusses Boston and Syria
Topics: Editor's Picks, President Obama, Press Conference, Syria, Guantanamo, Life News, News, Politics News
In a press conference on the 100th day of his second term (though his administration dismissed the symbolic nature of the date), President Obama said he would work with Congress to stop the detention of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, also answering questions on his “red line” in Syria, the sequester and endless congressional gridlock.
On Guantánamo
Facing questions about the ongoing hunger strike at Guantánamo, Obama said he was “not surprised there are problems,” saying that he continues to believe the U.S. should prioritize closing Guantánamo, as it is “not necessary to keep America safe, is expensive, hurts our relationships with allies and is a recruitment tool for extremists.”
Obama said he planned to “go back to” his efforts in 2008 to close Guantánamo, saying: “I am going to reengage with Congress to make the case that this is not in the best interest of the American people,” calling the detention facility and the indefinite detention of people who have not been tried or charged “contrary to who we are, contrary to our interests, and it needs to stop.”
On Syria
Obama was careful to avoid making definitive statements about American military action in Syria, saying that while his administration had confirmed the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government, it still did not have “all the facts.” He said, for example, they could not confirm “how they were used, when they were used or who used them” or a “chain of custody” firm enough to take decisive military action.
He went on to suggest that he is interested in building an international coalition to take action in Syria, rather than taking unilateral action, explaining: ”If we end up rushing to judgment without hard, effective evidence, then we find ourselves in a position where we can’t mobilize the international community to support what we do … It’s important to do this in a prudent way.”
He backed away from his “red line,” calling the use of chemical weapons a “game changer,” going on to say: “The use of chemical weapons would be a game changer, not simply for the U.S., but for the international community. We have international law and norms that say when you use these kinds of weapons you have the potential of killing a massive number of people in the most inhumane way possible … We don’t want that genie out of the bottle.”
Katie McDonough is an assistant editor for Salon, focusing on lifestyle. Follow her on Twitter @kmcdonovgh or email her at kmcdonough@salo







Masters Of The Universe: Lawmakers Obsess Over Threats From Space
Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift
United Nations Says $22,000 Internship Up For Auction Isn't Legitimate
45 Cozy Cabins You'll Want To Hide Away In Forever

Comments
21 Comments