Lessons from Lincoln leave gay immigrants behind
"The painful but necessary imperfection of compromise" means LGBT immigrants are excluded from immigration reform
Topics: Immigration, Gay Rights, Chuck Schumer, Patrick Leahy, Tony Kushner, Lincoln, Gay Marriage, Defense of Marriage Act, Politics News
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill. confer on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, May 20, 2013. (Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite)“I believe, in my heart of hearts, that what you’re doing is the right and just thing, but I believe this is the wrong moment, and this is the wrong bill.” That was Sen. Dick Durbin yesterday, one of several Democratic senators who wistfully explained — some of them even convincingly — why a provision allowing binational gay couples to reunite under immigration reform shouldn’t even be voted on. Republicans, notably Lindsey Graham and Jeff Flake, were openly threatening to sink a bill with LGBT provisions, risking the unbroken momentum of immigration reform. Indeed, the bill was successfully voted out of committee. All those “Lincoln” screenings in Washington last year have evidently sunk in, because Tony Kushner couldn’t have scripted it better.
Here was Chuck Schumer yesterday: “I’m a politician. That means I have chosen my life’s work in the constraints of the system to accomplish as much good as I can. I accept the tough choices, the painful but necessary imperfection of compromise, which is a part of our system of government.” Lincoln screenwriter Kushner told Chris Hayes that one message of “Lincoln” was that “Too much impatience can make it impossible for anything to happen,” and he had his president tell the radical Thaddeus Stevens, “When the people disagree, bringing them together requires going slow till they’re ready to make up the …” and Stevens cut in, “I shit on the people and what they want and what they’re ready for!” (Leahy, whose disappointment yesterday seemed the most genuine, did not go quite that far.)
Last night’s scene did the movie one better, because this wasn’t just about how far to go, but about whose turn it was. Some Republicans may eventually vote for comprehensive immigration reform that would potentially change the lives of millions of people, and, it is hoped, throw some Latino votes their way; they still don’t even pretend to care about gay people. Many people believe that the former represents an opportunity that simply hasn’t existed before, and that the discrimination against the latter is just a matter of time. The Supreme Court may overturn the Defense of Marriage Act that helps keep these couples separated, though experts have differed on how much explicit authorization from Congress would be needed even if DOMA is wholly struck down.
Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com. More Irin Carmon.







Comments
2 Comments