FBI’s shameless 9/11 claims
FBI Director Robert Mueller invokes the terror attack to defend NSA's snooping -- but history doesn't support him
Topics: National security, National Security Agency, intelligence, FBI, 9/11, Terrorism, Civil Liberties, surveillance state, Surveillance, Editor's Picks, Edward Snowden, Prism, Politics News
Could the National Security Agency’s massive surveillance programs uncovered this month have stopped 9/11? That’s what outgoing FBI Director Robert Mueller said before a House Judiciary Committee hearing today, in the latest escalation from administration officials defending the programs. First, officials said the program had helped stop a plot in New York, then they said it had stopped “dozens,” and now the big one — 9/11.
Had the program been in place at the time, Mueller said, counterterrorism officials may have been able to connect the dots and could have “derailed” the plot entirely. He pointed to one specific case: There was an al-Qaida safe house in Yemen that was in contact with a house in San Diego where plotter Khalid Almihdhar was staying, and:
If we had this program in pace at the time, we would have had been able to identify that particular telephone number in San Diego… If we had the telephone number from Yemen, we would have matched it up to that telephone number in San Diego, got further legal process, identified Almihdhar… The 9/11 Commission itself indicated that investigations or interrogations of Almihdhar once he was identified could have yielded evidence of connections to other participants in the 9/11 plot. The simple fact of their detention could have derailed the plan. In any case, the opportunity was not there.
Indeed, the 9/11 Commission Report, the definitive account of the attacks and the intelligence shortcomings that missed it, details the basic facts of Mueller’s testimony. But the report offers little evidence to support his conclusion.
Then, as now, the NSA is tasked with foreign signals intelligence and generally prohibited by law for surveilling domestic targets unless it gets a warrant from the secretive court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1979, which approves 99.99 percent of all requests. That was true on Sept. 10, 2001, as it is today. But the report did not find that the NSA lacked the powers it needed.
Alex Seitz-Wald is Salon's political reporter. Email him at aseitz-wald@salon.com, and follow him on Twitter @aseitzwald. More Alex Seitz-Wald.









Comments
12 Comments