Nate Silver: When political gaffes matter

While little more than media sideshows in presidential campaigns, gaffes can turn senate races, says the stats man

Topics: Gaffes, faux pas, Iowa, Senate, Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Tom Harkin, Bruce Braley, ,

Nate Silver: When political gaffes matterNate Silver (Credit: ABC)

In his latest on FiveThirtyEight.com, Nate Silver considers the varying impacts a politician’s gaffe or faux pas can make during an election campaign. Focusing on an Iowa Senate seat race, Silver notes that one gaffe can be a game changer:

In Iowa, where Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin plans to retire, fellow Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley was looking like his most likely heir. Until, that is, the Republican PAC America Rising released a video of Braley referring to Iowa’s other senator, Chuck Grassley, as a “farmer from Iowa who never went to law school.” Iowa is no place to insult farmers, and Silver considers Braley’s one comment his potential downfall in the race.

But why are some gaffes more potent than others? For example, as Silver notes, Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” comments during the general election campaign barely moved the polls.

Silver gives a pretty basic rundown of why in certain (presidential compared to congressional) elections a faux pas can be a game-changer:



You Might Also Like

Races for the Senate differ in some important ways.

First, the candidates are usually less well-known to voters. Braley has strong name recognition in the northeastern quadrant of Iowa, which he represents in Congress. But statewide, 46 percent of Iowans hadn’t known enough about him to form an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted before the release of the “farmer” video. For some of them, the “farmer” comment will represent their first impression of the candidate.

The second difference is that the presidential race is never a sideshow. Even contests as lopsided as Reagan vs. Mondale in 1984 generate a disproportionate amount of media attention. By contrast, senatorial campaigns compete against one another for scarce resources, such as funds from campaign committees, and attention from activists and the national press.

Natasha Lennard

Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    jkrebs04, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada

    akvarog, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.

    jhgraphicsusa, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R., DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    iMAGICations,DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

Loading Comments...