Hillary Clinton’s real problem: It’s possible to be both “authentic” and wrong

The "authentic Hillary Clinton" is a hawk. Maybe the country won't care much for authenticity after all

Topics: Hillary Clinton, Foreign policy, Syria, Barack Obama, Ron Fournier, Editor's Picks, Media Criticism,

Hillary Clinton's real problem: It's possible to be both "authentic" and wrongHillary Clinton (Credit: AP/Susan Walsh)

Team Hillary Clinton released a strange statement yesterday afternoon trying to tamp down the fire over her Epic Split with President Obama on foreign policy and, specifically, what should have been done in the early stages of the Syrian uprising.

The statement claimed that her comments were not “an attempt to attack him, his policies, or his leadership.” Which doesn’t make a lot of sense, since her comments were a direct criticism of his policy with regards to Syria. The statement itself even goes on to say that the two have had some “honest differences on some issues, including aspects of the wicked challenge Syria presents.”

Clinton’s explanation of her hawkish foreign policy, as we argued, probably wasn’t the result of her reading polls of the president’s poor foreign policy approval ratings and making a move; instead, they were her being honest about her foreign policy. Which is pretty well established by this point as stringently interventionist. She and all other politicians should continue to be honest, for the simple reason that when politicians are honest about what they want, it simplifies the process of picking and choosing whom one would like to support.

But the simple act of “honesty” isn’t itself a political winner that rises above all else. It’s possible to both a) appreciate Hillary Clinton for being honest and b) decide not to support her because you disagree with what she believes. Because policy matters!

You Might Also Like

We’ve agreed with much of what National Journal’s Ron Fournier has been saying this week — that Clinton’s comments were more likely her honest, hawkish opinion than the result of a political calculation, and that yesterday’s walk-back was relatively incoherent. But Fournier ultimately just finds a way to funnel all of this toward his vague obsession about Americans’ thirst for leadership overriding all other considerations — including crucial policy stances. Here’s how he expresses his dismay with her walk-back in a piece today:

Clinton didn’t make a mistake challenging a male authority figure. She wasn’t wrong to speak her mind. Her aspirations are not dependent on her “hugging it out.” The lesson here is to be true to yourself. Stick to your guns. Be authentic. After all, that’s really what Americans want in a leader.

But there’s another thing that Americans may want in a leader: disinterest in launching military interventions in Syrian civil wars! Authenticity is a great thing, but let’s not pretend that the politics of authenticity are — or should be — strong enough to outweigh the politics of having out-of-step policy ideas.

We can all probably agree, though, that Clinton’s thirst for interventionism is so well-established now that there probably isn’t any point to her pretending to represent anything else. That doesn’t mean, and shouldn’t mean, that people will respond to such authenticity by giving her their vote. In Politico, one “Clinton ally” describes Clinton’s Syria comments as “a trial balloon for the authentic Hillary. And if the Democrats won’t accept that then fine — maybe she won’t run.” This sounds like the perfect solution for everyone — Hillary Clinton, Ron Fournier, Democrats, you name it. Let Hillary Clinton declare her love for intervention from the highest mountaintops and then peace off if/when it turns out that Democratic primary voters disagree with her.

Jim Newell covers politics and media for Salon.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Martyna Blaszczyk/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 1

    Pond de l'Archeveche - hundreds thousands of padlocks locked to a bridge by random couples, as a symbol of their eternal love. After another iconic Pont des Arts bridge was cleared of the padlocks in 2010 (as a safety measure), people started to place their love symbols on this one. Today both of the bridges are full of love locks again.

    Anders Andersson/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 2

    A bird's view of tulip fields near Voorhout in the Netherlands, photographed with a drone in April 2015.

    Aashit Desai/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 3

    Angalamman Festival is celebrated every year in a small town called Kaveripattinam in Tamil Nadu. Devotees, numbering in tens of thousands, converge in this town the day after Maha Shivratri to worship the deity Angalamman, meaning 'The Guardian God'. During the festival some of the worshippers paint their faces that personifies Goddess Kali. Other indulge in the ritual of piercing iron rods throughout their cheeks.

    Allan Gichigi/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 4

    Kit Mikai is a natural rock formation about 40m high found in Western Kenya. She goes up the rocks regularly to meditate. Kit Mikai, Kenya

    Chris Ludlow/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 5

    On a weekend trip to buffalo from Toronto we made a pit stop at Niagara Falls on the Canadian side. I took this shot with my nexus 5 smartphone. I was randomly shooting the falls themselves from different viewpoints when I happened to get a pretty lucky and interesting shot of this lone seagull on patrol over the falls. I didn't even realize I had captured it in the shot until I went back through the photos a few days later

    Jassen T./National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 6

    Incredibly beautiful and extremely remote. Koehn Lake, Mojave Desert, California. Aerial Image.

    Howard Singleton/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 7

    Lucky timing! The oxpecker was originally sitting on hippo's head. I could see the hippo was going into a huge yawn (threat display?) and the oxpecker had to vacate it's perch. When I snapped the pic, the oxpecker appeared on the verge of being inhaled and was perfectly positioned between the massive gaping jaws of the hippo. The oxpecker also appears to be screeching in terror and back-pedaling to avoid being a snack!

    Abrar Mohsin/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 8

    The Yetis of Nepal - The Aghoris as they are called are marked by colorful body paint and clothes

    Madeline Crowley/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 9

    Taken from a zodiac raft on a painfully cold, rainy day

    Ian Bird/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 10

    This wave is situated right near the CBD of Sydney. Some describe it as the most dangerous wave in Australia, due to it breaking on barnacle covered rocks only a few feet deep and only ten metres from the cliff face. If you fall off you could find yourself in a life and death situation. This photo was taken 300 feet directly above the wave from a helicopter, just as the surfer is pulling into the lip of the barrel.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

Loading Comments...