Chris Matthews vs. Obama: How the president lost one of his top supporters
Pundit who famously swooned the president now calls him socially "lazy" -- and says he listens to Michelle too much
Topics: Barack Obama, Cable News, Chris Matthews, George W. Bush, Iraq, isis, Laziness, manhood, Media Criticism, Michelle Obama, MSNBC, presidents, pundits, Valerie Jarrett, War, Media News, Politics News
Chris Matthews has gone stark raving nuts. I know, I know. How is this different than any other time? Well, there’s something special about what happens to some political pundits when war fever breaks out and Matthews is one of the most special of them all. It’s true that he has worked very hard over the past few years to erase the memories of his Iraq war cheerleading, repeatedly pointing to a couple of obscure skeptical columns he wrote in the run-up while ignoring his much higher profile boosterism on television. Oddly, he even told a gathering of cable industry insiders that if only there had been 24 hour cable news back in 2003, the Iraq war could have been appropriately challenged. As FAIR pointed out in this report, cable news did exist during that period and it was led by people who said things like this:
Chris Matthews: “Those people out in the streets [protesting the IMF], do they hate America?”
Conservative Cliff May: “Yes, I’m afraid a lot of them do. They hate America. They align themselves with Saddam Hussein. They align themselves with terrorists all over the world.”
Hardball correspondent David Shuster: “anti-Americanism is in the air.”
On April 9th, the day the statue of Saddam was pulled down in Baghdad (which we later learned was an orchestrated PR event) Matthews declared: “We’re all neo-cons now.” Indeed, throughout the post 9/11 period, Matthews consistently marveled at President Bush’s puerile rhetoric as a prime example of manly leadership. But what he really yearned for was a real life movie star action hero and he finally got one on May 1, 2003 when the president donned a costume and landed in a jet on an aircraft carrier:
We’re proud of our president. Americans love having a guy as president, a guy who has a little swagger, who’s physical, who’s not a complicated guy like Clinton or even like Dukakis or Mondale, all those guys, McGovern. They want a guy who’s president. Women like a guy who’s president. Check it out. The women like this war. I think we like having a hero as our president. It’s simple. We’re not like the Brits…
What’s the importance of the president’s amazing display of leadership tonight?..
What do you make of the actual visual that people will see on TV and probably, as you know, as well as I, will remember a lot longer than words spoken tonight? And that’s the president looking very much like a jet, you know, a high-flying jet star. A guy who is a jet pilot. Has been in the past when he was younger, obviously. What does that image mean to the American people, a guy who can actually get into a supersonic plane and actually fly in an unpressurized cabin like an actual jet pilot?…
Do you think this role, and I want to talk politically… the president deserves everything he’s doing tonight in terms of his leadership. He won the war. He was an effective commander. Everybody recognizes that, I believe, except a few critics. Do you think he is defining the office of the presidency, at least for this time, as basically that of commander in chief? That… if you’re going to run against him, you’d better be ready to take [that] away from him…
The president there — look at this guy! We’re watching him. He looks like he flew the plane. He only flew it as a passenger, but he’s flown….He looks for real. What is it about the commander in chief role, the hat that he does wear, that makes him — I mean, he seems like — he didn’t fight in a war, but he looks like he does.
That was, to say the least, a curious reaction from a man who says he was against the Iraq war. Of course, he wasn’t alone. Throughout the period it was taken as an act of faith that the president was hugely popular — even as his numbers tumbled below 50% the political pundits refused to accept it. And there was very little pushback from the media on Iraq, especially in cable news. Indeed, anyone who showed skepticism or tried to examine the beliefs of the very large numbers of Americans who were not in favor of the war in those days was unceremoniously booted from the network. (And Matthews endorsed their booting, by the way.) So perhaps his latest round of criticism toward President Obama’s response to ISIS is just his survival instinct kicking in. Whatever the motives, the last few weeks of Hardball have been a full fledged fear festival.
It started back in August when ISIS released that horrifying video of journalist James Foley being executed. No decent person could have felt anything less than revulsion. But not everyone had the immediate, hysterical reaction Chris Matthews had to the president’s speech condemning it:
“I don’t know why he used the word ‘justice.’ It’s not appropriate here. This is an attack on our country, we have to react to it .. .This is our country versus this group that’s declared war on us. What’s justice mean in this con– I don’t know why the word’s used, like we’re going to go to the World Court with this … no American president can survive if he lets Americans be beheaded on international television with impunity. Impunity! He has to strike back, as an American, it’s in our soul!”
