Navigation Salon Salon Books email print
Arts & Entertainment
.Books
Comics
Health & Body
Media
Mothers Who Think
News
People
Politics2000
Technology
- Free Software Project
Travel & Food
_______
Columnists

 

Current
Wire Stories

Click here to read the latest stories from the wires.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Also Today

For a full list of today's Salon Books stories, go to the Books home page.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon Books

Reviews
"My Russian"
A serious novel that's almost a thriller tells of a woman who assumes a disguise and hunkers down 11 blocks from home.

By Stephanie Zacharek
[07/21/99]

Reviews
"The Dragon Hunt"
In his first collection in English, an expatriate Vietnamese author tells grueling (and highly original) stories of suffering.

By Judith Coburn
[07/20/99]

Dear Mr. Blue
case dismissed
women who write using only lower-case letters must be careful about love. they'll fall too easily for a cabbie, a pizza boy or a poet.

By Garrison Keillor
[07/20/99]

Book Bag
The wild side
The author of "The Hours" picks five books from the edge that belong in the center.

By Michael Cunningham
[07/19/99]


The never-ending war
Even in hindsight, no one -- soldier or journalist, politician or scholar -- can agree on what went wrong.

By Zachary Karabell
[07/19/99]

Complete archives for Books

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -




Who killed literature? | page 1, 2

In the final two chapters of the book, Woodring doffs his diagnostic cap for a prescriptive hard hat, and quickly the book unravels into moralistic hodgepodge. It becomes easy to imagine the entire project springing from one of those if-I-ran-the-world conversations in the teachers' lounge. He has a lot of ideas for fixing the bugaboos that have irked him not only at university but also primary and secondary levels of education. Many of his rants pertain to the art of teaching freshman composition. Leaving no stone unturned, he covers such dire topics as the neutered suffix ("Spokespersons yes, waitpersons maybe; fireman is a nuisance, with firefighter available; airman can die of neglect") and e-mail discussion groups. Although his detailed prescriptions are meant to weave a tapestry that molds writers of "clarity and vigor," these chapters -- reminiscent of college course descriptions -- go down like a Wasa cracker.

Guidance in the observation of detail should come early. Have each student describe, for example, the similarities and differences of two houses near the classroom (affluent teachers have been known to pass out tokens for transportation to distant houses), and then assign to classmates X, Y, and Z the task of rewriting the descriptions by A, B, and C for greater accuracy and detail. For fairness and other advantages, a further step adapted from interactive core programs would have the descriptions and evaluations further evaluated in class discussion."

Just reading about it makes me want to bolt to the nearest registrar's office and hand in a drop slip. Imagine having to actually perform the assignment.




bn.com

See what books are making news at BARNES & NOBLE
 

Toward the end of the book, Woodring takes time out to sing the praises of the core program at Columbia College, a series of mandatory courses covering seminal humanities texts spreading from Homer to Camus. This program became the subject of controversy first during the canon debates, over the number of female and non-white authors on their syllabuses, then later as featured in David Denby's 1996 "Great Books: My Adventures With Homer, Rousseau, Woolf, and Other Indestructible Writers of the Western World," in which Denby -- then a reviewer for New York magazine -- returned to Columbia to read great books and muse about the culture wars.

Yet for Woodring, the core seems to be about a more enlightened form of elbow-rubbing. "A Manhattan or Albany lawyer," he states, "who hears another in the firm allude to idols of the cave with reference simultaneously to Bacon and Plato recognizes a fellow graduate of Columbia College." Sure: They're at the water cooler. They exchange a couple of secret handshakes and a laugh about "The Golden Ass." Meanwhile the rest of us can't get a cup of water without being subjected to their insufferable erudition. I don't mean to suggest to that the world wouldn't be a better place if all college graduates had, as Woodring puts it, "read carefully under tutelage the same epics, dramas, satires, and philosophic and political essays," but rather to illustrate how easily literariness morphs into pretension.

What is strangest about this book is that while cobbling such a passionate argument for a new inclusive spirit in literary studies, Woodring has written a book with such obviously limited appeal. Even he himself says in the introduction that the book would address issues most pertinent to those whom "might choose to attend an annual meeting of the Modern Language Association." Choose to go to the MLA conference? I didn't know people did that.

And yet, I hesitate to dismiss the book out of hand. No one can doubt that he has thought an awful lot about the meaning of literature. And many of his conclusions and suggestions are apt and admirable -- though in the end, I wonder what they add to the debate.
salon.com | July 21, 1999

 

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Jose Klein is a writer living in San Francisco.

Sound off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Print this story  Get a printer-friendly version

Email this story  E-mail a friend about this article

Backflip This Story  Backflip this article to find it again

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

 

Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.