<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > All Salon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/category/all_salon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Female soldiers fight the brass ceiling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12333331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Having dragged its feet for almost two full decades on letting openly gay citizens serve in the military, <a href="http://www.defense.gov/">the Defense Department is now “evolving”</a> on women in combat. Those sex roles move at a geological pace, don’t they?</p><p>On Thursday, the Pentagon released a report allowing a trickle more of estrogen into the front lines, with women now officially assigned, instead of informally attached, to battalions. But despite an explicit recommendation from a panel of neutral experts, still no ground fighting, no combat infantry, no special forces. In a press release, the women veterans’ Service Women’s Action Network “regretted” the failure to lift the “unfair” Combat Exclusion Policy, which precludes women from becoming infantry members.</p><p>Will they never learn? A year ago, the lame duck Congress finally voted an end to the despised exclusion of openly gay men and women from the service, “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The same arguments – unit cohesion, unfitness for combat – that were used against open gay service now live on as the last barriers to women. For however many women are fit enough and inclined to take those hard-line jobs, as for the many dedicated gay and lesbian service members, the exclusions are an insurmountable barrier to their aspirations and a costly waste of human power for the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having dragged its feet for almost two full decades on letting openly gay citizens serve in the military, <a href="http://www.defense.gov/">the Defense Department is now “evolving”</a> on women in combat. Those sex roles move at a geological pace, don’t they?</p><p>On Thursday, the Pentagon released a report allowing a trickle more of estrogen into the front lines, with women now officially assigned, instead of informally attached, to battalions. But despite an explicit recommendation from a panel of neutral experts, still no ground fighting, no combat infantry, no special forces. In a press release, the women veterans’ Service Women’s Action Network “regretted” the failure to lift the “unfair” Combat Exclusion Policy, which precludes women from becoming infantry members.</p><p>Will they never learn? A year ago, the lame duck Congress finally voted an end to the despised exclusion of openly gay men and women from the service, “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The same arguments – unit cohesion, unfitness for combat – that were used against open gay service now live on as the last barriers to women. For however many women are fit enough and inclined to take those hard-line jobs, as for the many dedicated gay and lesbian service members, the exclusions are an insurmountable barrier to their aspirations and a costly waste of human power for the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholic tribalism and the contraceptive flap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12334871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/singleton/">The resolution to the contraception contretemps</a> seems mainly designed to do one thing: mollify the Catholics who defied the U.S. Conference of Bishops to support the Affordable Care Act in 2010. Church leaders are unlikely to officially back this so-called accommodation – the White House isn't calling it a compromise -- just as they continued to oppose the ACA even after President Obama did everything imaginable to insist the new law wouldn't provide federal funding for abortion.</p><p>But the new agreement makes it possible for women's groups and some liberal Catholic leaders to maintain a truce on hot-button social issues while working together around issues of women's health and universal access to healthcare. Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America are happy with the solution, and so is Sister Carol Keehan of the Catholic Health Association, who endured withering heat from the bishops and their right-wing allies over the ACA. Kristen Day of Feminists for Life likewise backs the deal. Even New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan called it "a step in the right direction," though he demanded more time to examine the fine print and suggested "legislation will still be required" to protect the church's right to discriminate against women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salman Rushdie fears nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salman Rushdie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12320291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Plates and glasses are cleared away, and a hush descends on the packed private dining room of a fancy Manhattan Indian restaurant; a distinguished writer -- the star of the evening’s event -- is about to give a reading. The iPad in his hands bathes his familiar features in a soft, electric glow that complements the muted lights and blinking candles spaced around the room.</p><p>As Salman Rushdie intones his own elegant prose in a rich, musical British accent, a soundtrack plays softly but distinctly in the background. If the music seems particularly well-selected -- if its rhythms subtly match the story's turning points -- that’s because it was commissioned expressly for the purpose.</p><p>Though the story is short, Rushdie stops several times to ask the audience if he should continue. At each juncture, rapt listeners beg him to go on. After the performance is over, guests murmur words like “mesmerizing” and “transporting” as they turn back to their tablemates -- and I’m one of them.</p><p>The event is a glitzy dinner organized by <a href="http://www.booktrack.com/">Booktrack</a>, a company that publishes e-books with "synchronized soundtracks"; the occasion is the launch of the e-publisher's first short story -- Rushdie’s “In the South" -- with accompanying music composed by John Psathas. ("In the South" is available for download now from Booktrack's website.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/salman_rushdie_fears_nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The two Americas clash at CPAC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12334471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The two Americas came face to face briefly Friday afternoon at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C. While several thousand conservatives thronged the Wardman Park Marriott Hotel, several hundred progressive unionists marched up to the hotel's entrance, banging drums, carrying signs like "CPAC: Conservatives Pleasing America's Corporations" and chanting "We are the 99 percent." As they were turned back by police and hotel security, conference participants watched, often with disdain.</p><p>"Get a job," shouted one conservative. "I've got a job," one long-haired demonstrator fired back. "I'm a farmer. I grow the food you eat." The demonstrators, responding to an email message from the <a href="http://www.dclabor.org/">D.C. Metropolitan AFL-CIO Labor Council</a>, came from a wide range of unions including the United Auto Workers, the Service Employees International Union, and the Sheet Metal Workers Union. They marched with members from the Fight for Philly community group, the New York Committee for Change, and veterans of the two now-evicted Occupy D.C. sites.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making the perfect cover girl</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12333291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Retouching is like tequila. Sure, a little makes everybody look better. But go too far and you feel like puking. For years now, the media has struggled with how best to strike that pleasantly Cuervo-goggled balance, swinging wildly between <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/09/lauren_photoshop/">science fiction-level Photoshopping</a> and the <a href="http://www.marieclaire.com/hair-beauty/beauty/unretouched-beauty-ad">self-congratulatorily unaltered</a>. But as excessively sweetened-up images have come under increasing scrutiny – and been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/hastily_withdrawn_ad_campaigns/">flat-out banned</a> in extreme cases -- the industry is beginning to take its cue from the unlikeliest of sources: its audience. This week, Glamour magazine revealed what happened when it asked its readers <a href="http://www.glamour.com/health-fitness/blogs/vitamin-g/2012/02/you-tell-us-how-should-glamour.html">"How much is too much?"</a> retouching. And the over 1,000 reader responses paint an intriguing picture of how deep we're willing to go into the land of altered images.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/making_the_perfect_cover_girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A birth-control compromise could divide the right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Bishops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12332891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Call it the Taco Bell frontier. When President Obama personally <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/10/fact-sheet-women-s-preventive-services-and-religious-institutions">announced</a> today that the foretold <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/will_obama_compromise_on_birth_control/  ">compromise</a> on contraceptive coverage would involve insurers' directly offering no-co-pay contraception to women whose employers object, he wasn't trying to placate the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, who made it clear this week that they were uninterested in anything resembling compromise. He was talking to moderates who might be horrified to learn how far the USCCB wanted to take things.</p><p>Anthony Picarello, that group's general counsel, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-02-08/catholics-contraceptive-mandate/53014864/1">told</a> USA Today that "We're not going to do anything until this is fixed," meaning removing the requirement for fully covered birth control from the healthcare law altogether, because there are "good Catholic business people who can't in good conscience cooperate with this." He added, "If I quit this job and opened a Taco Bell, I'd be covered by the mandate."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions in a &#8220;death spiral&#8221;? Not on my job site</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With his assertions in Salon that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/02/occupys_challenge_to_big_labor/">"unions are in a death spiral</a>" and "private sector unionism has all but vanished," Arun Gupta advances a shortsighted and incomplete narrative promoted too often by the mainstream media. His blanket assertion that organized labor has no response to today's challenges, other than to throw hundreds of millions of dollars at the Democratic Party, demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the nuances of today's union movement. <a href="http://wepartypatriots.com">As a close observer of the labor movement</a>, I am confident in stating that, at least in the construction sector, Gupta's portrait bears little resemblance to what is actually occurring.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The answer that’s been staring them in the face</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12332181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The timing of this year's Conservative Political Action Conference worked out nicely for Rick Santorum, who took the stage Friday morning less than three days after his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/mitt_romneys_night_from_hell/">startling sweep</a> of Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado. The room was full of activists who have been looking -- and looking and looking and looking -- for a "pure" alternative to Mitt Romney, with many more watching on television or online. Santorum's breakthrough this week caught their attention, and here was his chance to make the sale.</p><p>Of course, Santorum is hardly the only Republican candidate who's earned an audition for the role of chief Romney rival, and each one before him has proven spectacularly incapable of capitalizing on the opportunity.</p><p>Rick Perry surged to gigantic polling leads when he jumped into the race late last summer, then made a fool of himself in debate after debate and became an afterthought. Herman Cain supplanted Perry sometime during the fall, but fizzled when he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OxnN2pxMAg">couldn't provide</a> a simple, coherent defense of his signature 9-9-9 plan and after a bizarre sexual harassment saga. Then there was Newt Gingrich, whose erratic style and political past gave his (<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/31/the_trouble_with_having_no_friends/">many</a>) intraparty enemies an endless supply of ammunition -- enough to destroy him once in December and then again when he somehow rose from the dead in January.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_answer_that%e2%80%99s_been_staring_them_in_the_face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Oscar goes to &#8230; &#8220;Twilight&#8221;!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/and_the_oscar_goes_to_twilight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/and_the_oscar_goes_to_twilight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12327781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm here to make a modest proposal. What if the Oscars -- an imaginary Oscars, a thought-experiment Oscars, the Oscars of an alternate universe -- honored movies that people actually liked?</p><p>No, I know, I know -- they sometimes do, pretty much on the stopped-clock-occasionally-correct principle. And <em>somebody</em> must like each of this year's best-picture nominees, with the possible exception of the universally allergenic <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close/">"Extremely Loud &amp; Incredibly Close."</a> (I appreciated one reader's recent comment that the hidden virtue of that film lay in combining the annual quota of schmaltzy Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock vehicles into one compact package.) After all, the whole reason why <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_artist/">"The Artist"</a> appears to be the front-runner is because it's charming and unpretentious and nearly impossible to dislike -- although I don't happen to think it's all that great -- whereas the other nominees do not share that quality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/and_the_oscar_goes_to_twilight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m here to make a modest proposal. What if the Oscars &#8212; an imaginary Oscars, a thought-experiment Oscars, the Oscars of an alternate universe &#8212; honored movies that people actually liked?</p><p>No, I know, I know &#8212; they sometimes do, pretty much on the stopped-clock-occasionally-correct principle. And <em>somebody</em> must like each of this year&#8217;s best-picture nominees, with the possible exception of the universally allergenic <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close/">&#8220;Extremely Loud &amp; Incredibly Close.&#8221;</a> (I appreciated one reader&#8217;s recent comment that the hidden virtue of that film lay in combining the annual quota of schmaltzy Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock vehicles into one compact package.) After all, the whole reason why <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_artist/">&#8220;The Artist&#8221;</a> appears to be the front-runner is because it&#8217;s charming and unpretentious and nearly impossible to dislike &#8212; although I don&#8217;t happen to think it&#8217;s all that great &#8212; whereas the other nominees do not share that quality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/and_the_oscar_goes_to_twilight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/and_the_oscar_goes_to_twilight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adele: Too fat for fashion designer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Lagerfeld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12332011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to be both "too fat" and "beautiful"? Ask Karl Lagerfeld – the man who this week found himself about as popular as last year's jeggings when, in his capacity as Metro's guest editor, he sounded off about Adele.</p><p>The 78-year-old Lagerfeld, a man who co-authored a best-selling diet book featuring "protein sachets," "homeopathic granules" and "quail flambé" -- and who has very publicly struggled with his own weight issues over the years -- has never been one to hold his tongue on the subject of women's bodies. In 2009, he was quoted in the German magazine Focus saying, "No one wants to see curvy women. You've got fat mothers with their bags of chips sitting in front of the television and saying that thin models are ugly." But this time, the Chanel designer seems to have believed he was paying a compliment. While declaring the British chanteuse <a href="http://www.metro.us/newyork/life/article/1089980--karl-lagerfeld-on-lana-del-rey-the-greek-crisis-and-m-i-a-s-middle-finger">"a little too fat,"</a> he helpfully acknowledged that "she has a beautiful face and a divine voice" and called her "the thing at the moment."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/adele_too_fat_for_fashion_designer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico City does it right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12328841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For those of you in the Boston area, I'll be appearing this Sunday, Feb. 12, at 12:15 p.m. at the Boston Globe Travel Show at the Seaport World Trade Center. I'll take questions from the audience, and will be interviewed by Alex Beam, the longtime Boston Globe columnist and author of the Funniest Thing Ever Written.<strong>*</strong></p><p>This is your chance to hear me repeat all of the things I've been saying for years in my column, except live and in-person, and have your expectations shattered when you discover that the big-shot swashbuckling Pilot is actually just some slouchy old bald guy with a lousy attitude and a terrible speaking voice. Say it isn't so!</p><p>I'm thinking maybe I'll just show some <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/globetrodden/sets/">travel pictures</a> instead of talking about airlines.  Or hook my iPod up to the speakers and play some Grant Hart songs.</p><p>There will be a meet-and-greet sort of thing afterward. I accept cash, checks and gift certificates, plus canned goods and other non-perishables.</p><p><strong>*</strong> The Funniest Thing Ever Written is exactly that. It's a line from one of Alex Beam's columns back in the fall of 2000:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/mexico_city_does_it_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big banks win again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schneiderman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, a group of well-connected and powerful men announced that the federal government and state attorneys general had agreed to a multibillion-dollar settlement of claims relating to falsified foreclosure documents. The image of former corporate lawyer-turned-Attorney General Eric Holder and Iowa official Tom Miller complimenting each other on their courage and bravery was a stark reminder of how little power foreclosure victims have in Washington. The terms of the settlement were still secret, but we saw hints of what is to come: The <a href="http://nationalmortgagesettlement.com/">website</a> set up to inform the public noted that homeowners may not know for <a href="http://nationalmortgagesettlement.com/faq">up to three years</a> whether they are eligible for help. <strong> </strong></p><p>Rather than settling anything, this agreement is simply a continuation of the policy framework of both the Bush and the Obama administrations. So what, exactly, is that framework? It is, as Damon Silvers of the Congressional Oversight Panel, which monitored the bailouts, once put it, to preserve the capital structures of the largest banks. "We can either have a rational resolution to the foreclosure crisis or we can preserve the capital structure of the banks," said Silvers in October, 2010. "We can’t do both." Writing down debt that cannot be paid back -- the approach Franklin Roosevelt took -- is off the table, as it would jeopardize the equity keeping those banks afloat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man who could beat Chavez</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>MAIQUETIA, Venezuela — An hour’s drive from Caracas, thousands of people gathered in this coastal barrio at Venezuela’s national airport, which was recently given the dubious honor of being the worst in Latin America.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a>Clad in blue T-shirts and waving tiny red, yellow and blue flags, the lively crowd sang and danced, waiting for the arrival of the man who is the first serious threat to President Hugo Chávez in his 13-year tenure.</p><p>Henrique Capriles Radonski is the frontrunner for primaries due to take place on Sunday, in preparation for October’s presidential election.</p><p>For the first time in its disjointed history, the opposition he is about to command has finally united to take on the socialist president.</p><p>When he arrives, el pueblo — "the people," as Chávez affectionately calls them — crowds around him.</p><p>The 39-year-old Capriles has risen up the political ladder in Venezuela over the last decade, once a mayor and now governor of the country’s second-most populous state, Miranda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel, MEK and state sponsor of Terror groups</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/israel_mek_and_state_sponsor_of_terror_groups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/israel_mek_and_state_sponsor_of_terror_groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most under-reported political stories of the last year is the devoted advocacy of numerous prominent American political figures on behalf of an Iranian group long <a href="http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm">formally designated as a <strong>Terrorist organization</strong></a><strong> under U.S. law</strong>. A large bipartisan cast has received substantial fees from that group, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), and has then become their passionate defenders. The group of MEK shills includes former top Bush officials and other Republicans (Michael Mukasey, Fran Townsend, Andy Card, Tom Ridge, Rudy Giuliani) as well as prominent Democrats (Howard Dean, Ed Rendell, Bill Richardson, Wesley Clark). As <em>The Christian Science Monitor </em><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/401543">reported last August</a>, those individuals "have been paid tens of thousands of dollars to speak in support of the MEK." No matter what one thinks of this group -- here is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/14/opinion/sunday/an-iranian-cult-and-its-american-friends.html?pagewanted=all">a summary of its activities</a> -- it is formally designated as a Terrorist group and it is thus a felony under U.S. law to provide it with any "material support."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/israel_mek_and_state_sponsor_of_terror_groups/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most under-reported political stories of the last year is the devoted advocacy of numerous prominent American political figures on behalf of an Iranian group long <a href="http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm">formally designated as a <strong>Terrorist organization</strong></a><strong> under U.S. law</strong>. A large bipartisan cast has received substantial fees from that group, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), and has then become their passionate defenders. The group of MEK shills includes former top Bush officials and other Republicans (Michael Mukasey, Fran Townsend, Andy Card, Tom Ridge, Rudy Giuliani) as well as prominent Democrats (Howard Dean, Ed Rendell, Bill Richardson, Wesley Clark). As <em>The Christian Science Monitor </em><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/401543">reported last August</a>, those individuals &#8220;have been paid tens of thousands of dollars to speak in support of the MEK.&#8221; No matter what one thinks of this group &#8211; here is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/14/opinion/sunday/an-iranian-cult-and-its-american-friends.html?pagewanted=all">a summary of its activities</a> &#8211; it is formally designated as a Terrorist group and it is thus a felony under U.S. law to provide it with any &#8220;material support.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/israel_mek_and_state_sponsor_of_terror_groups/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/israel_mek_and_state_sponsor_of_terror_groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>279</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The neocons&#8217; big Iran lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In February 2003, less than a month before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, Gen. Eric Shinseki <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-02-25-iraq-us_x.htm">told a hearing</a> of the Senate Armed Services Committee that “Something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers” would be required to occupy Iraq in order to stabilize it in the wake of an invasion.</p><p>What quickly followed is well known. Several days later, in what journalist James Fallows called “<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/invasion/interviews/fallows.html">probably the most direct public dressing-down</a> of a military officer, a four-star general, by a civilian superior since Harry Truman and Douglas MacArthur, 50 years ago,” Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz called Shinseki’s estimate “<a href="http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/167/35435.html">wildly off the mark</a>,” and said that “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/27/wolfowitz-shinseki/">it’s hard to conceive</a> that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the 1 percent accept &#8220;enough&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Of all the no-no's in contemporary America -- and there are many -- none has proven more taboo than the ancient doctrine of <em>dayenu</em>. Translated from the original Hebrew, the word roughly means "It would have been enough." The principle is that a certain amount of a finite resource should satisfy even the gluttons among us.</p><p>I know, I know -- to even mention that notion is jarring in a nation whose consumer, epicurean and economic cultures have been respectively defined by the megastore, the Big Mac and the worship of the billionaire. Considering that, it's amazing the word "enough" still exists in the American vernacular at all. But exist it does, and more than that -- the term's morality is actually starting to suffuse the highest-profile debates in the public square.</p><p>After the financial meltdown, for example, Congress witnessed an unexpectedly spirited fight over enacting pay caps at bailed-out financial institutions. Beneath the overheated rhetoric, the brawl revolved around determining how much is enough to compensate Wall Street's government-subsidized scam artists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How you know Obama is winning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12329581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As long as Barack Obama occupies the White House, the annual Conservative Political Action Conference will be defined by alarmist hysteria, confident declarations that the public is turning or has turned on the administration, and cheap shots at the expense of a caricatured version of the president.</p><p>So it's not at all surprising that this year's conference opened on Thursday with a parade of teleprompter jokes, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/02/09/kenyan_anti_colonial_thinking_the_movie.html">a plug</a> for Dinesh D'Souza's "The Roots of Obama's Rage," and apocalyptic warnings like the one from Georgia Rep. Tom Graves, who <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/despite-lightheartedness-at-cpac-gathering-tension-within-movement-can-be-felt/2012/02/09/gIQAA9Gc2Q_story_1.html">told attendees</a> that reelecting Obama would be akin to ending "this great story we call America." CPAC crowds -- and, really, grassroots conservatives across the country -- have been delighting in this sort of talk since Obama took office.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/how_you_know_obama_is_winning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The beautiful evolution of maps</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12316271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a>I’ve got maps on my mind <a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/graphic/maps-maps-everywhere/">again</a>, having recently found W.W. Jervis’ "The World in Maps: A Study in Map Evolution," published by Oxford University Press in 1937. I discovered this book quite unexpectedly one recent afternoon, running errands in my Queens neighborhood. New York’s mild winter has teased out the book vendors who usually wait until spring before returning to the sidewalks with their tables. With an emphasis on Spanish-language titles and genre fiction, at first glance the books on offer appear mundane. But if you take the time to really look, something of interest is sometimes dug out of a box.</p><p>[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="420" caption="&quot;Due East Over Stokes Mountain&quot;"]<img src="http://rangelstudio.com/sites/rangelstudio.com/files/02DueEastoverStokesMountain-large.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="348" />[/caption]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_beautiful_evolution_of_maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m the worst person ever!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I am the worst person I know. My life is a shambles and I get so desperate for companionship that I talk to someone whose interests overlap with mine somewhat, and I'm so sociopathically charming that she falls in love with me or thinks I'm "great" or that I bring a lot to her life. My technique is to take the few things I know a little something about and present them so that they're accessible or so that they shed some light on a topic she has an interest in. This makes her think I'm worth something. Then I fail to be great in all ways and she's heartbroken.</strong></p><p><strong>Yeah, I know this isn't all my fault, that it takes two to make a bad relationship, and all that. And certainly there are women -- most of them -- who wouldn't even look my way. Great for them. But for those who are willing to look my way, don't I have a basic human obligation to keep them safe from my horribleness and inevitable failures? Without exception I say the wrong thing, do the wrong thing or just collapse.</strong></p><p><strong>So. Given that I contribute nothing to the world but disappointment and misery, and I can't control my desire for companionship and attention, shouldn't I just kill myself? Isn't that the moral thing to do at this point?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/im_the_worst_person_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When my job stopped paying</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F**ked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It comes up all the time in conversation. Most recently, I heard it from a stranger at the dentist’s office, talking back to the television news and those of us fortunate enough to be stuck in the waiting room with her. “High unemployment, my ass. Just a bunch of lazy people looking to sit on their sofa and watch TV while we pay their bills.”</p><p>Sorry, lady. You’ve mistaken me as a responsible, upright citizen. Allow me to introduce myself: I am a former sofa-lounger, and now I qualify as something even lower than that.</p><p>My last full-time job ended in January 2009. Everyone at our small pharmaceutical marketing agency received an email invitation to a mandatory staff meeting. And, much like a bad reality show, it was only moments before the scheduled time that we began to realize we weren’t all invited to the same room.</p><p>Along with more than 30 colleagues, I got voted off the island.</p><p>Those lucky enough to receive invitations to the other room were told to take a long lunch while we poor saps cleared our desks.</p><p>I spent the first several weeks in a daze. There is not a lot of room for pride when you’re a single mom, so I filed for unemployment benefits. And in the height of irony, I was told I wasn’t eligible for food assistance because my income was too high.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/contract_job_open_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

