<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/category/elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:44:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for Democrats to ditch Andrew Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Hickory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trail of Tears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson-Jackson dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Biden speaks at event named for Old Hickory tonight, more appalling stories show party should dump him as icon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spring means that appeals for money are bursting forth from both major political parties. It also means Democratic officials in states and counties around the country are busy getting people out to their major fundraiser, the Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner. And they’re bringing in the big guns: Vice President Joe Biden will keynote the South Carolina Democrats’ dinner <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/biden-cruz-to-headline-sc-events-2-miles-apart/">tonight</a>.</p><p>But<strong> </strong>after an election in which<strong> </strong>Democrats rode a wave of minority support to keep the White House and Senate, party activists should wonder about one of the founders for whom that event is named. If branding matters, then the tradition of honoring perhaps the most systematic violator of human rights for America’s nonwhites should finally run its course.</p><p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2013/04/TD-allman-finding-florida-greatest-hits">Renowned journalist</a> T.D. Allman’s gripping "Finding Florida: The True History of the Sunshine State" argues that brutality was a habit of mind for party icon Andrew Jackson long before he laid the groundwork, as president, for the Trail of Tears, the thousand-mile death march that killed 4,000 Cherokees in 1838−39.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What you need to know about Gabriel Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new GOP nominee in the race to replace John Kerry looks strong, but has plenty of problems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a secret cabal of scientists designed the perfect politician for today's GOP from the DNA up, it might look something like Gabriel Gomez, who won a GOP primary last night to face off against Democrat Ed Markey in a special election to fill the Massachusetts Senate seat vacated by Secretary of State John Kerry.</p><p>The bilingual first-generation former Navy SEAL is a Harvard Business School graduate with a successful business career, some moderate political stances, and a penchant for running marathons. He crossed the finish line at the Boston Marathon <a href="http://www.abc17news.com/news/elections/boston-bombings-overshadow-mass-senate-election/-/18518118/19949220/-/10x7dib/-/index.html">just a few minutes before</a> the bombs went off last month. While stationed in South America in the early 1990s he met his furutre-wife, who was working in the Peace Corps at a school for students with special needs. “<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/04/21/from-middle-class-beginnings-gomez-forged-unconventional-path/XQk3alB9AeKc7tg3yUB1SM/story.html">I’m exactly what the American dream is all about</a>,” Gomez said in an April GOP debate against two other Republican challengers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the real Anthony Weiner?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anthony_weiners_multiple_personalities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anthony_weiners_multiple_personalities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's played the role of Ed Koch-like moderate and Alan Grayson-like liberal. Which will we see next? (UPDATE)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that Anthony Weiner raked in serious cash last year <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/30/nyregion/jobless-after-scandal-weiner-triumphs-in-corporate-world.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;&amp;pagewanted=all">as a corporate consultant</a> – an ambiguous job that seems a lot like lobbying -- may seem jarring to national observers who viewed him as a liberal firebrand. But, playing a loud progressive on cable TV doesn’t necessarily make you one. And for Weiner, this stint as not-technically-a-lobbyist signals merely the latest turn for a politician who's craftily straddled the line between outer-borough Ed Koch-style moderation and Alan Grayson-style liberal activism.</p><p>The question is how much longer he'll be able to straddle.</p><p>Weiner's professional political life began in 1991, when he ran his maiden race for City Council. As Steve Kornacki <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/anthony_weiner_1991/">detailed for Salon</a>, he won a long-shot bid as a 27-year-old, in part by anonymously sending mailers linking his opponent to African-American figures (namely, Mayor David Dinkins and Jesse Jackson) unpopular in his white district. Appealing to the white ethnic constituency, he cultivated an identity in office as an outer-borough moderate, focusing on issues like graffiti, airport regulations and fire alarm boxes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anthony_weiners_multiple_personalities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anthony_weiners_multiple_personalities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census reveals historic black voter turnout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data shows more African Americans voted in 2012 than any other ethnic group, and at a greater rate than whites]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.</p><p>Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press.</p><p>Census data and exit polling show that whites and blacks will remain the two largest racial groups of eligible voters for the next decade. Last year's heavy black turnout came despite concerns about the effect of new voter-identification laws on minority voting, outweighed by the desire to re-elect the first black president.</p><p>William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the 2012 elections for the AP using census data on eligible voters and turnout, along with November's exit polling. He estimated total votes for Obama and Romney under a scenario where 2012 turnout rates for all racial groups matched those in 2004. Overall, 2012 voter turnout was roughly 58 percent, down from 62 percent in 2008 and 60 percent in 2004.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican&#8217;s term limits proposal is dumb, undemocratic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/republicans_term_limits_proposal_is_dumb_undemocratic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/republicans_term_limits_proposal_is_dumb_undemocratic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's catching fire online but a House member's plan to impose congressional term limits is idiotic. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While catching fire in conservative circles this week, a constitutional amendment proposed by Republican Matt Salmon to <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:hjres41:">impose congressional term limits</a> is a terrible solution to a non-problem. Republicans used to love term limits, when they believed that incumbency advantages were depriving them of what they thought was a deserved majority in Congress. Once they won control of the House and Senate in the mid-1990s, most Republicans promptly forgot about the idea. But some die-hards are still pushing it, and this week Salmon called for limiting politicians to a maximum of six years in the House and 12 in the Senate.</p><p>It’s just as bad an idea now as ever.</p><p>Just to briefly remind everyone why it’s such a bad idea, it really comes down to this: The federal government is going to develop policies. Liberal policies, conservative policies, whatever: The government will develop and carry out choices about public policy. Each of these choices winds up being a struggle among a whole lot of players: the president; members of the House and the Senate; the political parties; interest groups; the permanent bureaucracy in executive branch departments and agencies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/republicans_term_limits_proposal_is_dumb_undemocratic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/republicans_term_limits_proposal_is_dumb_undemocratic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save your cash &#8212; forget OFA!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/save_your_cash_forget_ofa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/save_your_cash_forget_ofa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizing for Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president’s outside group won’t help his agenda in Congress, or affect the course of the Democratic Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organizing for Action, the Obama campaign successor organization that is supposed to generate grass-roots support for the president’s agenda, released its first financial report late this week. It raised close to $5 million, money that is being spent to support such Obama initiatives as the gun bill currently in the Senate and the upcoming immigration bill.</p><p>So, if you want to support Obama’s agenda, and you want to make the most efficient donation you can, should you send money?</p><p>Nope. Here’s the thing. There are basically two reasons to support OFA, and both of them, I’d argue, can be better accomplished by putting your money elsewhere.</p><p>The first purpose of OFA would be to directly help the president’s agenda in Congress. It’s not particularly likely, however, that OFA, no matter how much money it can raise, could do that. Political scientists have found very little success for the presidential strategy of going over the heads of Congress in hopes that voters can pressure their representatives to do what the president wants.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/save_your_cash_forget_ofa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/save_your_cash_forget_ofa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reagan Revolution is over</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the GOP has failed to capitalize on nostalgia for the ex-president: The nation has changed and so has the party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the Onion's <a href="http://www.theonion.com/video/zombie-reagan-raised-from-grave-to-lead-gop,14385/?r44b=no">spoof</a> about Ronald Reagan being raised from the grave to lead today's Republican Party still remains one of the funniest political satires in recent memory is because it rings so true. With the GOP in such disarray, you get the sense that the only thing that unifies the conservative movement is a visceral hatred of America's first African-American president and a cultlike worship of the Gipper. You also get the sense that if Republican leaders could have, they would have done exactly what that Onion spoof suggested --  reanimate the corpse of Ronald Reagan and run him for president in 2012 -- and for good reason. According to a stunning <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/08/1980s-poll-nostalgic/2065095/">new national poll</a> released today by the National Geographic Channel, Reagan would have demolished Obama in a head-to-head match-up.</p><p>As the coverage of Margaret Thatcher's death this week reminds us, the 1980s still define us in so many ways. The National Geographic Channel poll, timed to the Sunday premiere of <a href="http://www.natgeotv.com/the80s">the channel's three-night "The '80s: The Decade That Made Us,"</a> is chock-full of revealing findings about why exactly that is.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi to Salon: They had to take me down</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House minority leader talks about female leadership and whether the GOP can woo women ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You remember the Republicans' 2010 midterm campaign message: Nancy Pelosi, <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/03/23/rnc-head-michael-steele-defends-fiery-anti-pelosi-ad/">engulfed in flames</a>, demon-like. Nancy Pelosi, in charge, bossing you around with her crazy liberal values. An official "Fire Pelosi" bus tour sponsored by the Republican National Committee, and the specter of her leadership <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/10/05/101640/why-do-republicans-love-to-demonize.html">invoked</a> in ad after ad.</p><p>All of this was a key Republican strategy in taking back the House, and while there were lots of reasons the Democrats lost and Pelosi was dethroned, it achieved the desired result. Since the next big electoral battle will be control of the House in 2014, and a Democratic win would presumably put Pelosi back in charge, expect to see more Pelosi boogeyman-ing.</p><p>"It didn't bother me, I figured they thought I was effective and therefore they had to take me down," Pelosi told Salon at the premiere Thursday night of "Fall to Grace," her daughter's HBO documentary on former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey. Still, she worries about the message it sends to other women who might be considering a run.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign finance reform in the age of Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_case_for_campaign_finance_reform_despite_citizens_united_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_case_for_campaign_finance_reform_despite_citizens_united_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All is not lost with the SCOTUS decision. Small-donor public financing can still give candidates a fair chance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a></p><p>Last Monday, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging the century-old ban on direct corporate contributions to federal election campaigns. That counts as good news in a month that included the court’s earlier decision to hear a case that challenges the aggregate contribution limits in campaign finance and Obama strategist David Axelrod <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/02/david-axelrod-mitt-romney-mitch-mcconnell-campaign-finance">declaring</a> that he would prefer a system of unlimited contributions with full disclosure. Almost all Republicans, the Supreme Court, and a powerful faction of the Democratic Party now fall somewhere on the spectrum between skepticism and vehement opposition to limits on contributions. The flimsy remains of the post-Watergate system of campaign finance regulation are on the verge of collapse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_case_for_campaign_finance_reform_despite_citizens_united_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_case_for_campaign_finance_reform_despite_citizens_united_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do campaigns still work?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/do_campaigns_still_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/do_campaigns_still_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research suggests that elections are mostly determined by factors outside of candidates' control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Last week, I participated in a symposium at Iowa State University entitled <a href="http://www.event.iastate.edu/event/28654/" target="_blank">“Social Science, Presidential Campaigns and Political Reporting.”</a> Among those who examined last year’s presidential election, the consensus seemed to be that the actual influence of the things we call “the campaign”—including advertisements, candidate visits, volunteer activity, etc.—was very small. The outcome of the election was very well explained by “the fundamentals,” including the economy, conditions of foreign policy, and other aspects of the political environment over which the candidates have little to no power. This is all very consistent with decades of political science research suggesting that campaigns only have minimal effects on voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/do_campaigns_still_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/do_campaigns_still_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Sanford ad: Everybody makes mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/mark_sanford_ad_everybody_makes_mistakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/mark_sanford_ad_everybody_makes_mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachian Trail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former South Carolina governor released a new campaign ad about "second chances"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford released a new TV ad for his congressional campaign, emphasizing that everyone makes mistakes and deserves "second chances."</p><p>“I’ve experienced how none of us go through life without mistakes,” Sanford says in the ad. “But in their wake we can learn a lot about grace, a God of second chances and be the better for it. In that light, I humbly step forward and ask for your help in changing Washington.”</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dshklvQKxYE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Sanford left office in disgrace in 2009 after revelations that he was conducting an affair with an Argentinian woman, which came to light after he disappeared from his state. He is running for his old congressional seat, recently vacated by Republican Tim Scott after Scott was appointed to Sen. Jim DeMint's senate seat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/mark_sanford_ad_everybody_makes_mistakes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/mark_sanford_ad_everybody_makes_mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican dark money group&#8217;s corporate sponsors revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/no_surprise_corporations_helped_fuel_republican_dark_money_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/no_surprise_corporations_helped_fuel_republican_dark_money_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exxon, Pfizer and others put up hundreds of thousands to finance the State Government Leadership Foundation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> Some of the nation’s biggest corporations donated more than a million dollars to launch a Republican nonprofit that went on to play a key role in recent political fights.</p><p>Like the <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/how-nonprofits-spend-millions-on-elections-and-call-it-public-welfare">nonprofit groups</a> that poured money into last year’s elections, the decade-old <a href="http://www.sglf.org/">State Government Leadership Foundation</a> has been able to keep the identities of its funders secret. Until now.</p><div>A records request by ProPublica to the IRS turned up <a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/602763-sglf-donors.html">a list</a> of the original funders of the group: Exxon, Pfizer, Time Warner, and other corporations put up at least 85 percent of the $1.3 million the foundation raised in the first year and a half of its existence, starting in 2003.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/no_surprise_corporations_helped_fuel_republican_dark_money_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/no_surprise_corporations_helped_fuel_republican_dark_money_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The worst of Valentine&#8217;s Day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine's Day 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 weirdest attempts at capitalizing on Cupid's holiday -- from juicing to pizza-scented perfume]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've always been a tad suspicious of the consumerist motivations behind Valentine's Day -- but that was before I became a "sex and relationships" writer. Now I'm a conspiracy theorist wearing a tinfoil-hat made of Hershey's Kisses wrappers. You need only take a glimpse of my in box around this time of year -- or better yet, actually read through the dozens of the scheming, hackneyed and downright bizarre V-Day pitches you'll find there -- to understand why.</p><p>I'm a fan of laughing instead of crying -- especially when it comes to the ceremonial excess of Feb. 14 -- so I bring you this year's 10 worst attempts to capitalize on Cupid's holiday.</p><p>[slide_show id="13199454"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven hours on line to vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/president_obama_on_long_voting_lines_we_need_to_fix_that_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/president_obama_on_long_voting_lines_we_need_to_fix_that_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers say expanding hours and shortening ballots isn’t enough, so how do we fix our broken voting system?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a>  At last night's State of the Union address, Michelle Obama was be joined by 102-year-old Desiline Victor, who, like many in Florida and elsewhere, waited hours to vote on Election Day.</p><p>“By the way,” Obama said in his election speech. “We have to fix that.”</p><p>But <em>how</em> to fix it remains unclear.</p><p>Though new research on states’ performance in the November election reveals long lines kept thousands from voting, there’s still much we don’t know about what would best speed up the process.</p><p>Victor’s home state of Florida had the longest average wait time of any state at 45 minutes. Victor waited for three hours. Other Floridians reported standing in line for up to 7 hours.</p><p>Not every voter had Victor’s stamina: Professor Theodore Allen at Ohio State University estimated that long lines in Florida deterred at least 201,000 people, using a formula based on voter turnout data and poll closing time. The number only includes people discouraged by the wait at their specific polling site, and not those who stayed home due to “the general inconvenience of election day.” The real number, Allen says, is likely much higher. One study also showed that black and Hispanic voters nationwide waited longer on average than white voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/president_obama_on_long_voting_lines_we_need_to_fix_that_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/president_obama_on_long_voting_lines_we_need_to_fix_that_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s shameless finance reform flip-flopping</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/obamas_shameless_finance_reform_flip_flopping_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/obamas_shameless_finance_reform_flip_flopping_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turning his campaign into a nonprofit that accepts unlimited donations is just the president's latest reversal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> When President Obama told supporters that he would morph his campaign into a new nonprofit that would accept unlimited corporate donations, the announcement set off a familiar round of griping from campaign finance reformers.</p><p>The creation this month of Organizing for Action, which will promote the president’s second-term agenda, appears to be the fourth reversal by Obama on major money-in-politics issues since 2008.</p><p>“No big bank or corporation will donate million-dollar checks to OFA without the expectation that it will impact which issues they engage on, and that’s very troubling,” said Adam Green of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.</p><p>The Washington Post noted that in reorganizing his campaign as a tax-exempt social welfare group, the president is embracing a structure that has been criticized for allowing anonymous money into politics.</p><p>Conservatives who’ve been attacked by the Obama camp for their reliance on such “dark money” groups called out the president’s “brazen hypocrisy.” Neither the White House nor Organizing for America responded to requests for comment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/obamas_shameless_finance_reform_flip_flopping_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/obamas_shameless_finance_reform_flip_flopping_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s jobs report is a mixed bag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unemployment rate is holding steady at 7.8 percent, which suggests economic growth is a bit sluggish]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s employment report shows steady employment growth, fast enough to keep the jobless rate from rising, but not fast enough to knock it down much.</p><p>December’s payrolls were up 155,000 and the unemployment rate held steady at 7.8 percent.  Factories and construction sites added jobs — 25,000 and 30,000, respectively — an improvement over recent months.  On the other hand, the public sector shed another 13,000 jobs, driven exclusively by local governments, the continuation of a longer-term negative trend as localities struggle with budget constraints.</p><p>Hourly wages and average weekly hours got a bit of a bump up as well, so weekly earnings are up 2.4 percent over the past year.  Since inflation recently has been tracking at around 2 percent, that’s a slight gain in real pay (important, because starting this month, most workers will take a 2 percent hit to their paychecks due to the expiration of the payroll tax break, a casualty of the fiscal cliff deal).  There was also some evidence of more folks moving from part-time into full-time jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow TV Awards: Kate Aurthur</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_kate_aurthur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_kate_aurthur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Blue Glow TV Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kate Aurthur writes about TV as BuzzFeed&#8217;s chief L.A. correspondent. Kate says about her top 5: &#8220;The weird thing about my five favorites is that there are nine of them. In no order&#8221;:  &#8220;Bunheads&#8221; (ABC Family) &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; (AMC) &#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221; (AMC) &#8220;Real Housewives of Orange County&#8221; (Bravo) &#8220;Grey’s Anatomy&#8221; (ABC) &#8220;Game of Thrones&#8221; (HBO) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Kate Aurthur writes about TV as BuzzFeed's chief L.A. correspondent.</em><br /> <em> </em></p><p><strong>Kate says about her top 5: "The weird thing about my five favorites is that there are nine of them. In no order": </strong><strong id="internal-source-marker_0.7530723600648344"></strong></p><p><strong>"Bunheads"</strong> (ABC Family)<br /> <strong>"Mad Men"</strong> (AMC)<br /> <strong>"Breaking Bad"</strong> (AMC)<br /> <strong>"Real Housewives of Orange County"</strong> (Bravo)<br /> <strong>"Grey’s Anatomy"</strong> (ABC)<br /> <strong>"Game of Thrones"</strong> (HBO)<br /> <strong>"Parenthood"</strong> (NBC)<br /> <strong>"Justified"</strong> (FX)<br /> <strong>"The Good Wife"</strong> (CBS)<br /> <strong id="internal-source-marker_0.7530723600648344"></strong></p><p><strong id="internal-source-marker_0.7530723600648344">Special Categories:<br /> <strong>1. What was the show of the year?</strong> </strong>This category is the only one I’m having a problem with; I love all my shows, including ones that would have made the list if you’d asked for my Top 50, for different reasons! I’m going to pick "Mad Men" because I was so impressed and moved by Season 5, and thought that Jon Hamm, Elisabeth Moss, Christina Hendricks, John Slattery, Vincent Kartheiser and Jessica Paré did incredible things.<strong id="internal-source-marker_0.7530723600648344"><br /> </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_kate_aurthur/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_kate_aurthur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pundit: GOP should buy women&#8217;s magazines</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Harlan Reynolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instapundit says Republicans should sway voters through the media]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a New York Post <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/where_big_gop_bucks_could_matter_sud7apkPHDcFSVDDZkFDEL">editorial</a>, <a href="http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/">Instapundit’s</a> Glenn Harlan Reynolds has a simple reason for why Republicans <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/08/republicans-learn-the-cost-of-alienating-women-voters.html">performed poorly</a> with “low-information” female voters: The party didn't make nice in the media. Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson threw $150 million at the campaign but Reynolds would like to see the money spent on a friendlier brand of propaganda than attack ads:</p><blockquote><p>My suggestion: Buy some women’s magazines. No, really. Or at least some women’s Web sites…</p> <p>For $150 million, you could buy or start a lot of women’s Web sites. And I’d hardly change a thing in the formula. The nine articles on sex, shopping and exercise could stay the same. The 10th would just be the reverse of what’s there now.</p> <p>For the pro-Republican stuff, well, just visit the “Real Mitt Romney” page at snopes.com, or look up the time Mitt Romney <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/the-time-mitt-romney-rescued-a-14-year-old-kidnap">rescued </a>a 14-year-old kidnap victim, to see the kind of feel-good stories that could have been running. For the others, well, it would run articles on whether Bill Clinton should get a pass on his affairs, whether it’s right that the Obama White House pays women less than men, and reports on how the tax system punishes women.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman&#8217;s son pleads guilty to assaulting girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/congressmans_son_pleads_guilty_to_assaulting_girlfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/congressmans_son_pleads_guilty_to_assaulting_girlfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Moran was last seen discussing voter fraud with James O'Keefe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Moran, son of Rep. Jim Moran, D.-Va., pleaded guilty to assaulting his girlfriend today.</p><p>The couple were fighting outside a bar just after 1 a.m. on Dec. 1 when "Moran allegedly slammed his girlfriend's head into the bar's metal trash can cage," according to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/12/12/rep-jim-morans-son-guilty-of-beating-up-his-girlfriend-in-columbia-heights/">Washington City Paper</a>:</p><blockquote><p>After the attack, police described Moran's girlfriend as "bleeding heavily from her nose and also observed that her nose and right eye were extremely swollen." One of the ambulance technicians who transported her to Howard University Hospital told police that Moran appeared to have broken her nose and given her a skull fracture under her right eye.</p> <p>Moran was arrested for felony domestic violence assault, but pleaded the charge down to simple assault today. He was sentenced to probation.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/congressmans_son_pleads_guilty_to_assaulting_girlfriend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/congressmans_son_pleads_guilty_to_assaulting_girlfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>