<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Atlantic takes on the Atlantic&#8217;s take on online dating</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not that complicated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the Atlantic <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/a-million-first-dates/309195/" target="_blank">said</a> that online dating is ruining traditional marriage. Then, a day later, they <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/13/01/theres-no-evidence-online-dating-is-threatening-commitment-or-marriage/266797/" target="_blank">said</a> that it wasn't.</p><p>Confused? Of course you are.</p><p>Journalist Dan Slater wrote a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/a-million-first-dates/309195/2/" target="_blank">piece</a> for the Atlantic print edition about a man named Jacob who, through the magic of online dating, has been able to meet and sleep with many women and he is no longer interested in getting married.  In response, Atlantic editor Alexis Madrigal took to the Atlantic's <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/13/01/theres-no-evidence-online-dating-is-threatening-commitment-or-marriage/266797/" target="_blank">website</a> to refute Slater and his "spineless" argument with <em>a lot of data </em>and somewhere around 1,800 words.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare San Francisco river otter stumps researchers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[otters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first river otter seen in the city in decades has become a local celebrity -- and harbinger of cleaner water ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A rapt crowd followed a trail of bubbles that zipped over the surface of a seaside pond in the ruins of a 19th century bath in San Francisco.</p><p>San Francisco's newest star — the first river otter seen in the city in decades — surfaced its whiskery head furtively, a mouth full of sea grass. The crowd oohed as large waves pounded rocks just offshore, a briny smell and chill in the air.</p><p>The otter ducked back under water and took the sea grass underneath a concrete remnant of the historic baths, where the animal was building a nest.</p><p>"We came here to see the baths and this was just a bonus," said Eliza Durkin, who brought her son Jonathan to the site for a school project on historic places.</p><p>Beyond tourists, the otter has mystified and delighted conservationists, who are piecing together clues to figure out how he got there. The whiskery creature was first spotted by birdwatchers in September and has since settled into the City by the Bay.</p><p>River otters once thrived in the San Francisco Bay area, but development, hunting and environmental pollution in the 19th and 20th centuries has taken its toll on the once thriving local population.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tween booted off Facebook starts his own social network</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too young for Facebook, an 11-year-old takes the Internet into his own hands. The rest is Web history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though he was two years too young to join the social network, 11-year-old Zachary Marks signed up for Facebook, anyway. Less than a week later, this happened:</p><blockquote><p>I spent all my time on the computer chatting with friends. Then, I made mistakes. One of my adult friends cursed and posted something inappropriate, and I cursed back. Also, I friend-requested grownups who I did not know. About a day later, my dad found out. He was really mad. I had to deactivate my account.</p></blockquote><p>And so begins the story of <a href="http://www.gromsocial.com/" target="_blank">Grom Social</a>, the social networking site for the 15 and under set that Marks founded after being summarily booted from Facebook. Even though there are other kid-friendly networks he could have joined, none really appealed to the preteen. "They were all childish," he <a href="http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2013/01/02/16307382-kicked-off-facebook-pre-teen-creates-his-own-social-network" target="_blank">told</a> the "Today" show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: Colin Powell or Simon Cowell?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon cowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dumb tweet of the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A mistake anybody could make]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="286933985903398912"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adrian Lamo opens up about life after turning in Bradley Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrian lamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an IM chat with the Guardian, Lamo defends informing on the soldier, ponders the impossibility of hindsight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian Thursday <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/03/adrian-lamo-bradley-manning-q-and-ahttp://">published a fascinating IM interview </a>with Adrian Lamo, the hacker-turned-journalist and minister who famously turned Bradley Manning in to the Department of Defense after the young soldier confided in Lamo through online chats.</p><p>Lamo's elegant responses show a man attempting to detach himself from the realities of Manning's harsh detention and worrying legal prospects. They also show a man with enough philosophical soundness to reject questions about acting with hindsight.</p><p>Lamo told the Guardian's Ed Pilkington that he has not closely followed Manning's recent pretrial hearings:</p><blockquote><p>It's not because I take it lightly, but because I take it as seriously as I do. Making the choice to interdict a man's freedom knowing it could mean his life, is something that's easy to judge but can only really be understood by living it. You either fold it into your character, come to terms and go on with your life, or you get stuck in that moment forever. For a while I thought I would be. I took it badly. But I came to terms and continued my life some time ago. It has, after all, been two years.</p> <p>... I knew my actions might cost him his life. In that respect, any other outcome is preferable.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Recessions can be hazardous to kids&#8217; health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up with widespread economic instability can have long-term consequences for kids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/onlineFirst.aspx" target="_blank">study</a> in the online edition of JAMA Psychiatry shows that growing up during periods of widespread economic instability can have long-term consequences for kids. Researchers found that babies born during the two great recessions of the 1980s were more likely to develop behavioral problems later in life than those born during boom times.</p><p>The study confirms what largely seems like common sense: Financial insecurity is stressful, and anxiety associated with unemployment and low household income can affect how well parents parent. It's easy enough to understand how more time worrying about keeping the lights on could mean less time to focus on helping with homework and strengthening family bonds.</p><p>Led by Dr. Seethalakshmi Ramanathan of the State University of New York’s Upstate Medical University, researchers used information about 8,984 youth born between Jan. 1, 1980, and Dec. 31, 1984, as a sample group. As Time magazine <a href="http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/03/lasting-legacy-of-recessions-behavior-problems-among-teens/?iid=hl-main-lead" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google antitrust claims dropped by FTC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regulators found no evidence to claims that Google unfairly favors its own services in searches]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Google is agreeing to license certain patents to mobile phone rivals and stop a practice of including snippets from other websites in its search results as part of a settlement to end a 19-month investigation into the search leader's business practices, the Federal Trade Commission said Thursday.</p><p>U.S. antitrust regulators added that they have found no evidence to claims that Google unfairly favors its own services in search results.</p><p>Google did agree to license patents deemed to be "essential" for rival mobile devices such as Apple Inc.'s iPhone, Research in Motion Ltd.'s BlackBerry and smartphones running on a Microsoft Corp.'s Windows software. Some of the patents in question came as part of Google's $12.4 billion acquisition of device maker Motorola Mobility Holdings earlier this year.</p><p>Regulators say Google is also promising that upon request, it will exclude snippets copied from other websites in its summaries of key information, even though the company had insisted the practice is legal under the fair-use provisions of U.S. copyright law. Despite the fair-use practice, Google already had scaled back on the amount of cribbing, or "scraping," of online content after business review site Yelp Inc. lodged one of the complaints that triggered the FTC investigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama signs NDAA again, disappoints on Gitmo and civil liberties again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indefinite Detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second year in a row, the president signs into law a bill he purports to have major problems with]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time last year, President Obama said that he had "serious reservations" about certain provisions of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. But he signed it anyway. This year, the same provisions over which he was so reserved remain in the 2013 version of the bill, along with a number of brand-new problematic amendments. The president threatened a veto on the new bill's prohibitions on closing Guantánamo Bay detention center. But he didn't veto; he signed the bill again on Thursday.</p><p>Once again, Obama expressed his misgivings in a <a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2013ndaa.stm_.rel_.pdf.pdf">signing statement</a>, but stressed that "the need to renew critical defense authorities and funding was too great" to reject the bill, which approved a $633 billion armed forces budget for the 2013 fiscal year. Also approved in the NDAA are controversial provisions that will likely make closing Guantánamo Bay detention center impossible in Obama's presidency, and provisions elsewhere in the act that allow for the indefinite military detention of U.S. citizens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do millennials care about abortion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview, NARAL's president tells Salon it's time a new generation leads. But she's not sure they will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Roe v. Wade's 40th anniversary, NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan, 60, announced she would celebrate by stepping down and handing the reins to a younger generation -- the same one she had been <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2010/04/nancy-keenan-re-1.html">arguing</a> for years lacks the pro-choice intensity and commitment of her own.</p><p>Formed originally to repeal abortion bans before Roe, NARAL is now most closely associated with lobbying on the federal and state level, and for its close ties to the Democratic Party. Keenan's departure after eight years follows an election cycle when Democrats didn't apologize for being pro-choice -- and won.</p><p>This last election year also featured unprecedented public mobilization, across generations, on issues around abortion, birth control and rape. Two men, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, most closely associated with a total abortion ban lost Senate bids they'd seemed poised to win. Akin, too, came from a House of Representatives where antiabortion and anti-family planning legislating had seemed like a full-time job, but whose actual legislative victories have been few.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hundreds arrested in child pornography probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hundreds_arrested_in_child_pornography_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hundreds_arrested_in_child_pornography_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 200 adults have been arrested in an international investigation of child pornography]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 200 adults have been arrested in an international investigation of child pornography, Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Thursday.</p><p>The agency's director, John Morton, said 123 child victims were identified during the five-week investigation, which ended in early December. ICE and local authorities found 110 victims in 19 U.S. states, while the others were living in six countries elsewhere.</p><p>Morton declined to provide specific details about which foreign countries were involved, saying only that there were some cases in Mexico.</p><p>The investigation, dubbed "Operation Sunflower," was part of ICE's effort to find and rescue victims, and arrest abusers and people who make or transmit child pornography.</p><p>"We have to attack child exploitation relentlessly and together. There is no other way, there is no other answer," Morton said. "It is a wrong among wrongs. We are literally defending the defenseless."</p><p>Morton also announced arrest warrants for two unidentified adults charged in Los Angeles with molesting a girl who appeared in online photos to be about 13 when she was abused. The man and woman were identified only as "John Doe" and "Jane Doe" and authorities believe they may have been in the San Fernando Valley area north of Los Angeles when they abused the girl. Photos of the abuse investigators found online are believed to be about 11 years old, Morton said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hundreds_arrested_in_child_pornography_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hundreds_arrested_in_child_pornography_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun deaths rampant after Sandy Hook massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown Massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers are simply staggering: An average of 18 people have been killed each day since December 14]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> There have been more than 400 guns deaths since the Newtown massacre on December 14, according to a <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2012/12/gun_death_tally_every_american_gun_death_since_newtown_sandy_hook_shooting.html">new interactive project</a> between <em>Slate.com</em> and the anonymous twitter user @gundeaths.</p><p>The two launched the project because, as <em>Slate</em> writes, there are few real-time chronicles of daily gun deaths in the United States, despite the daily mention of firearms and gun politics in the media since the shooting. In fact, the onslaught of reporting on guns has been so intense, The Huffington Post published an article this morning with the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/douglas-anthony-cooper/bored-of-the-newtown-mass_b_2399602.html">headline “So You’re Bored of the Newtown Massacre?”</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet-connected devices now outnumber people in the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say hello to your shiny, Wi-Fi-enabled overlords]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone stay calm, but a new <a href="https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/more-than-400-million-devices-are-connected-in-us-homes-according-to-the-npd-group/" target="_blank">report</a> from market researchers NPD Group shows that we are now outnumbered by our gadgets. That's right, there are currently more smartphones, computers, tablets and game consoles in this country than there are humans.</p><p>There are currently <a href="http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html" target="_blank">315 million</a> people in the United States, but NPD estimates that there are 425 million devices operating in U.S. households. And with cheaper tablets and other devices hitting the market at a rapid clip, that number is sure to continue to grow.</p><p>The way I see it, we either start reproducing<em></em> or learn to speak binary code -- <em>fast</em>.</p><p>h/t <a href="http://betabeat.com/2013/01/we-are-outnumbered-the-u-s-now-has-more-internet-connected-devices-than-people/" target="_blank">BetaBeat</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software maker faces jail because his product was illegally used</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/software_maker_faces_jail_because_his_product_was_illegally_used/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/software_maker_faces_jail_because_his_product_was_illegally_used/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online casinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Stuart legally sold gambling software to overseas online casinos but the program was used by others in N.Y.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A software maker who sells programs used by online casinos and bookmakers outside the U.S. (where online gambling is legal) now faces criminal charges for allegedly abetting illegal gambling, as the software has been used in New York.</p><p>Although Robert Stuart and his family-run company insist they only sold their software product to legal overseas buyers, the software maker has been charged with one felony count for promoting gambling in New York through his software firm.</p><p>“It’s overreaching where they’re going after a software developer who sells the software with a legal license, and yet we’re still being prosecuted on how it’s being used,” <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/coder-charged-for-gambling-software/all/">Stuart told Wired</a>, noting that authorities have not told him yet whom he’s accused of aiding and abetting. According to the D.A.'s office, Stuart's software was used to make illegal bets in that state between September 2008 and June 2011.</p><p>Wired noted the considerably dangerous precedent the suit against Stuart could set:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/software_maker_faces_jail_because_his_product_was_illegally_used/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/software_maker_faces_jail_because_his_product_was_illegally_used/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transocean will pay $1.4bn settlement over Gulf oil spill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/transocean_will_pay_1_4bn_settlement_over_gulf_oil_spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/transocean_will_pay_1_4bn_settlement_over_gulf_oil_spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf of Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The owner of sunken drilling rig will settle with the Justice Department to resolve its civil and criminal probes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The Justice Department has reached a $1.4 billion settlement with Transocean Ltd., the owner of the drilling rig that sank after an explosion killed 11 workers and spawned the massive 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.</p><p>Two people with knowledge of the negotiations say Switzerland-based Transocean would pay the money to resolve the department's civil and criminal probe of the company's role in the Deepwater Horizon disaster.</p><p>The people spoke on condition of anonymity because the settlement hadn't been announced publicly, though that announcement was expected later Thursday.</p><p>One of the people, a law enforcement official familiar with the deal, said Transocean would pay $1 billion in civil penalties, $400 million in criminal penalties and would plead guilty to violating the Clean Water Act.</p><p>BP PLC, which leased the rig from Transocean, already has agreed to pay a record $4.5 billion in penalties and plead guilty to manslaughter and other criminal charges related to the spill. The deal with BP doesn't resolve the federal government's civil claims against the London-based oil company.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/transocean_will_pay_1_4bn_settlement_over_gulf_oil_spill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/transocean_will_pay_1_4bn_settlement_over_gulf_oil_spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona is trying to ruin Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say goodbye to @PaulRyanGosling! An Arizona lawmaker wants to ban Twitter parody accounts ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, you guys! It's a Twitter emergency! If Tea Party darling and Arizona House Republican Michelle Ugenti has her way, you can say TTYL to parody accounts like @SilentJimLehrer and @HologramTupac.</p><p>I know. It's awful.</p><p>Proposed House Bill 2004 would outlaw online impersonation without permission and make it a felony to create a website or profile in someone else's name with the intention to "harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten." Supporters say it will help stop online bullying. Critics argue that it could violate the First Amendment and (more important, <em>duh</em>) effectively end the national pastime of creating faux Twitter accounts to provide meta-commentary on the ups and downs of our public figures!</p><p>"The problem with this, and other online impersonation bills, is the potential that they could be used to go after parody or social commentary activities," Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff attorney Kurt Opsahl <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/01/02/bill-would-outlaw-posing-as-others-online/1805771/" target="_blank">told</a> the Arizona Republic. "While this bill is written to limit 'intent to harm,' if that is construed broadly, there could be First Amendment problems."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 in 24 drivers admit nodding off behind the wheel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/1_in_24_drivers_admit_nodding_off_behind_the_wheel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/1_in_24_drivers_admit_nodding_off_behind_the_wheel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The study also found drowsy driving was more common in men and people ages 25 to 34]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — This could give you nightmares: 1 in 24 U.S. adults say they recently fell asleep while driving.</p><p>And health officials think the number is probably higher. That's because some people don't realize it when they nod off for a second or two behind the wheel.</p><p>In a government study released Thursday, a little over 4 percent of U.S. adults said they fell asleep while driving at least once in the previous month. Some earlier studies reached a similar conclusion, but the survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was far larger.</p><p>The study found drowsy driving was more common in men and in people ages 25 to 34.</p><p>The results are from a survey of 147,000 adults in 2009 and 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/1_in_24_drivers_admit_nodding_off_behind_the_wheel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/1_in_24_drivers_admit_nodding_off_behind_the_wheel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting rages around Syrian military air base</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fighting_rages_around_syrian_military_air_base/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fighting_rages_around_syrian_military_air_base/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fighting_rages_around_syrian_military_air_base/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.N. estimates that the civil war has killed 60,000 people so far]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIRUT (AP) — Syrian troops and rebels fought intense battles Thursday around a strategic air base in the country's north and a suburb of the capital that government forces have been trying to capture since last month, activists and state media said.</p><p>The fighting is part of the escalating violence in a Syrian civil war that the United Nations estimates has killed more than 60,000 people since the revolt against President Bashar Assad began in March 2011.</p><p>The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said rebels stormed parts of the Taftanaz air base in the northwestern province of Idlib before withdrawing. The state-run SANA news agency said government forces protecting the base "repelled the terrorists' attempt to attack the airport" and inflicted heavy losses. The Syrian regime routinely refers to rebel forces as "terrorists."</p><p>The Observatory said rebels resumed their assault early Thursday in an attempt to capture the base, which has resisted several opposition efforts to take the facility in recent months.</p><p>The rebels have been pursuing a strategy of attacking airports and military airfields, targeting five air bases in Idlib and the nearby province of Aleppo, trying to chip away at the government's air power, which poses the biggest obstacle to advances by opposition fighters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fighting_rages_around_syrian_military_air_base/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fighting_rages_around_syrian_military_air_base/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megaupload: U.S. government lied to get search warrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/megaupload_u_s_government_lied_to_get_search_warrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/megaupload_u_s_government_lied_to_get_search_warrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kim dotcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The file-sharing site says the government misled a court in order to get search warrants for computer servers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shuttered file-sharing site Megaupload is attempting to have search warrants executed by the U.S. government deemed invalid. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-03/u-s-lied-to-get-search-warrants-megaupload-claims.html">According to</a> Bloomberg News, Megaupload have <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/118786756/Mega-Upload-Supp-Brief-1">filed a complaint</a> alleging that the government lied to a court to get warrants to search computer servers in Virginia that belonged to Megaupload.</p><p>TorrentFreak<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/megaupload-u-s-deliberately-misled-the-court-with-unlawful-search-warrants-130103/"> detailed </a>the substance of Megaupload's complaint:</p><blockquote><p>When the U.S. Government applied for the search warrants against Megaupload last year, it told the court that they had warned Megaupload in 2010 that it was hosting infringing files.</p> <p>Through its hosting company, Megaupload <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/megaupload-search-warrants-ignored-massive-non-infringing-use-121118/">was informed</a> about a criminal search warrant in an unrelated case where the Government requested information on 39 infringing files stored by the file-hosting service.</p> <p>At the time Megaupload cooperated with this request and handed over details on the uploaders. The files were kept online as Megaupload was instructed not to touch any of the evidence. However, a year later this inaction is being used by the U.S. Government to claim that Megaupload was negligent, leaving out much of the context.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/megaupload_u_s_government_lied_to_get_search_warrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/megaupload_u_s_government_lied_to_get_search_warrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highway of the future is seriously smart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a Dutch design lab could make roads cleaner, safer and weirder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dutch design lab <a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/projects/#liquid-space-6-1" target="_blank">Studio Roosegaarde</a> invents weird things. And now, the brains behind clothing that becomes <a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/project/intimacy-2-0/" target="_blank">transparent</a> while the wearer is getting, <em>ahem</em>, intimate and a room that contracts and expands based on how hard you <a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/project/liquid-space-6-1/" target="_blank">dance</a> in it would like to redesign Europe's entire system of highways and roads.</p><p>So they did.</p><p>According to Studio Roosegaarde the highways of the future are safer, cleaner and more environmentally sound. The lab has developed solar powered glow-in-the-dark roads that charge during the day to illuminate your evening drive, dynamic asphalt paint that transforms in response to road conditions like ice and sleet, and car lanes that double as electric car chargers by using magnetic fields under the asphalt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>