<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:46:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Female soldiers fight the brass ceiling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12333331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Having dragged its feet for almost two full decades on letting openly gay citizens serve in the military, <a href="http://www.defense.gov/">the Defense Department is now “evolving”</a> on women in combat. Those sex roles move at a geological pace, don’t they?</p><p>On Thursday, the Pentagon released a report allowing a trickle more of estrogen into the front lines, with women now officially assigned, instead of informally attached, to battalions. But despite an explicit recommendation from a panel of neutral experts, still no ground fighting, no combat infantry, no special forces. In a press release, the women veterans’ Service Women’s Action Network “regretted” the failure to lift the “unfair” Combat Exclusion Policy, which precludes women from becoming infantry members.</p><p>Will they never learn? A year ago, the lame duck Congress finally voted an end to the despised exclusion of openly gay men and women from the service, “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The same arguments – unit cohesion, unfitness for combat – that were used against open gay service now live on as the last barriers to women. For however many women are fit enough and inclined to take those hard-line jobs, as for the many dedicated gay and lesbian service members, the exclusions are an insurmountable barrier to their aspirations and a costly waste of human power for the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having dragged its feet for almost two full decades on letting openly gay citizens serve in the military, <a href="http://www.defense.gov/">the Defense Department is now “evolving”</a> on women in combat. Those sex roles move at a geological pace, don’t they?</p><p>On Thursday, the Pentagon released a report allowing a trickle more of estrogen into the front lines, with women now officially assigned, instead of informally attached, to battalions. But despite an explicit recommendation from a panel of neutral experts, still no ground fighting, no combat infantry, no special forces. In a press release, the women veterans’ Service Women’s Action Network “regretted” the failure to lift the “unfair” Combat Exclusion Policy, which precludes women from becoming infantry members.</p><p>Will they never learn? A year ago, the lame duck Congress finally voted an end to the despised exclusion of openly gay men and women from the service, “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The same arguments – unit cohesion, unfitness for combat – that were used against open gay service now live on as the last barriers to women. For however many women are fit enough and inclined to take those hard-line jobs, as for the many dedicated gay and lesbian service members, the exclusions are an insurmountable barrier to their aspirations and a costly waste of human power for the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/female_soldiers_fight_the_brass_ceiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholic tribalism and the contraceptive flap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12334871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/singleton/">The resolution to the contraception contretemps</a> seems mainly designed to do one thing: mollify the Catholics who defied the U.S. Conference of Bishops to support the Affordable Care Act in 2010. Church leaders are unlikely to officially back this so-called accommodation – the White House isn't calling it a compromise -- just as they continued to oppose the ACA even after President Obama did everything imaginable to insist the new law wouldn't provide federal funding for abortion.</p><p>But the new agreement makes it possible for women's groups and some liberal Catholic leaders to maintain a truce on hot-button social issues while working together around issues of women's health and universal access to healthcare. Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America are happy with the solution, and so is Sister Carol Keehan of the Catholic Health Association, who endured withering heat from the bishops and their right-wing allies over the ACA. Kristen Day of Feminists for Life likewise backs the deal. Even New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan called it "a step in the right direction," though he demanded more time to examine the fine print and suggested "legislation will still be required" to protect the church's right to discriminate against women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/11/catholic_tribalism_and_the_contraceptive_flap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The two Americas clash at CPAC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12334471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The two Americas came face to face briefly Friday afternoon at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C. While several thousand conservatives thronged the Wardman Park Marriott Hotel, several hundred progressive unionists marched up to the hotel's entrance, banging drums, carrying signs like "CPAC: Conservatives Pleasing America's Corporations" and chanting "We are the 99 percent." As they were turned back by police and hotel security, conference participants watched, often with disdain.</p><p>"Get a job," shouted one conservative. "I've got a job," one long-haired demonstrator fired back. "I'm a farmer. I grow the food you eat." The demonstrators, responding to an email message from the <a href="http://www.dclabor.org/">D.C. Metropolitan AFL-CIO Labor Council</a>, came from a wide range of unions including the United Auto Workers, the Service Employees International Union, and the Sheet Metal Workers Union. They marched with members from the Fight for Philly community group, the New York Committee for Change, and veterans of the two now-evicted Occupy D.C. sites.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_two_americas_at_cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A birth-control compromise could divide the right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Bishops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12332891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Call it the Taco Bell frontier. When President Obama personally <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/10/fact-sheet-women-s-preventive-services-and-religious-institutions">announced</a> today that the foretold <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/will_obama_compromise_on_birth_control/  ">compromise</a> on contraceptive coverage would involve insurers' directly offering no-co-pay contraception to women whose employers object, he wasn't trying to placate the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, who made it clear this week that they were uninterested in anything resembling compromise. He was talking to moderates who might be horrified to learn how far the USCCB wanted to take things.</p><p>Anthony Picarello, that group's general counsel, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-02-08/catholics-contraceptive-mandate/53014864/1">told</a> USA Today that "We're not going to do anything until this is fixed," meaning removing the requirement for fully covered birth control from the healthcare law altogether, because there are "good Catholic business people who can't in good conscience cooperate with this." He added, "If I quit this job and opened a Taco Bell, I'd be covered by the mandate."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/a_birth_control_compromise_could_divide_the_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions in a &#8220;death spiral&#8221;? Not on my job site</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With his assertions in Salon that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/02/occupys_challenge_to_big_labor/">"unions are in a death spiral</a>" and "private sector unionism has all but vanished," Arun Gupta advances a shortsighted and incomplete narrative promoted too often by the mainstream media. His blanket assertion that organized labor has no response to today's challenges, other than to throw hundreds of millions of dollars at the Democratic Party, demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the nuances of today's union movement. <a href="http://wepartypatriots.com">As a close observer of the labor movement</a>, I am confident in stating that, at least in the construction sector, Gupta's portrait bears little resemblance to what is actually occurring.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/unions_in_a_death_spiral_not_on_my_job_site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big banks win again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schneiderman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, a group of well-connected and powerful men announced that the federal government and state attorneys general had agreed to a multibillion-dollar settlement of claims relating to falsified foreclosure documents. The image of former corporate lawyer-turned-Attorney General Eric Holder and Iowa official Tom Miller complimenting each other on their courage and bravery was a stark reminder of how little power foreclosure victims have in Washington. The terms of the settlement were still secret, but we saw hints of what is to come: The <a href="http://nationalmortgagesettlement.com/">website</a> set up to inform the public noted that homeowners may not know for <a href="http://nationalmortgagesettlement.com/faq">up to three years</a> whether they are eligible for help. <strong> </strong></p><p>Rather than settling anything, this agreement is simply a continuation of the policy framework of both the Bush and the Obama administrations. So what, exactly, is that framework? It is, as Damon Silvers of the Congressional Oversight Panel, which monitored the bailouts, once put it, to preserve the capital structures of the largest banks. "We can either have a rational resolution to the foreclosure crisis or we can preserve the capital structure of the banks," said Silvers in October, 2010. "We can’t do both." Writing down debt that cannot be paid back -- the approach Franklin Roosevelt took -- is off the table, as it would jeopardize the equity keeping those banks afloat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/banks_get_off_easy_in_mortgage_settlement_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man who could beat Chavez</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12331281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>MAIQUETIA, Venezuela — An hour’s drive from Caracas, thousands of people gathered in this coastal barrio at Venezuela’s national airport, which was recently given the dubious honor of being the worst in Latin America.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a>Clad in blue T-shirts and waving tiny red, yellow and blue flags, the lively crowd sang and danced, waiting for the arrival of the man who is the first serious threat to President Hugo Chávez in his 13-year tenure.</p><p>Henrique Capriles Radonski is the frontrunner for primaries due to take place on Sunday, in preparation for October’s presidential election.</p><p>For the first time in its disjointed history, the opposition he is about to command has finally united to take on the socialist president.</p><p>When he arrives, el pueblo — "the people," as Chávez affectionately calls them — crowds around him.</p><p>The 39-year-old Capriles has risen up the political ladder in Venezuela over the last decade, once a mayor and now governor of the country’s second-most populous state, Miranda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_man_who_could_beat_chavez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The neocons&#8217; big Iran lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In February 2003, less than a month before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, Gen. Eric Shinseki <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-02-25-iraq-us_x.htm">told a hearing</a> of the Senate Armed Services Committee that “Something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers” would be required to occupy Iraq in order to stabilize it in the wake of an invasion.</p><p>What quickly followed is well known. Several days later, in what journalist James Fallows called “<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/invasion/interviews/fallows.html">probably the most direct public dressing-down</a> of a military officer, a four-star general, by a civilian superior since Harry Truman and Douglas MacArthur, 50 years ago,” Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz called Shinseki’s estimate “<a href="http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/167/35435.html">wildly off the mark</a>,” and said that “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/27/wolfowitz-shinseki/">it’s hard to conceive</a> that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/the_neocons_big_iran_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the 1 percent accept &#8220;enough&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Of all the no-no's in contemporary America -- and there are many -- none has proven more taboo than the ancient doctrine of <em>dayenu</em>. Translated from the original Hebrew, the word roughly means "It would have been enough." The principle is that a certain amount of a finite resource should satisfy even the gluttons among us.</p><p>I know, I know -- to even mention that notion is jarring in a nation whose consumer, epicurean and economic cultures have been respectively defined by the megastore, the Big Mac and the worship of the billionaire. Considering that, it's amazing the word "enough" still exists in the American vernacular at all. But exist it does, and more than that -- the term's morality is actually starting to suffuse the highest-profile debates in the public square.</p><p>After the financial meltdown, for example, Congress witnessed an unexpectedly spirited fight over enacting pay caps at bailed-out financial institutions. Beneath the overheated rhetoric, the brawl revolved around determining how much is enough to compensate Wall Street's government-subsidized scam artists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/10/can_the_1_percent_accept_enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The foreclosure deal: Every little bit counts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first thing to understand about Thursday's much ballyhooed <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/faq-the-foreclosure-settlement/2011/08/25/gIQAcvGV1Q_blog.html?wprss=ezra-klein ">$26 billion foreclosure fraud settlement</a> between five big banks, the federal government and 49 states is that it is nowhere near as big of a deal as it is being made out to be. You can safely ignore the claim that the torturously negotiated settlement is the heftiest financial punishment of industry by government since the landmark multistate tobacco deal in 1998 or President Obama's declaration Thursday morning that it is the "largest joint federal-state settlement in our nation's history."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_foreclosure_deal_every_little_bit_counts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reason vs. hysteria in the birth control debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Boies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday night we reached the high and the low, so far, in the debate over the Obama administration's requirement that Catholic institutions that employ non-Catholics include contraception coverage in their health insurance policies.</p><p>The high, in terms of reason and clarity, came from famed attorney David Boies on MSNBC's "The Last Word." Lawrence O'Donnell has let male "liberal" pundits like Mark Shields wax a little shrill on his show, but to his credit, he offered the best rebuttal to all the shrieking I've seen so far: Boies calmly and clearly explaining the new regulations as an issue of labor law, and the government's regulation  of employers (relatively minimal, compared to other countries) on issues of health, safety and non-discrimination.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/we_are_the_98_percent/singleton/">I've tried to make the same points</a>: <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/02/catholics_need_to_preach_what_we_practice/singleton/">What if Catholics didn't believe in child labor laws</a>? Would we let church-run agencies flout them? Boies used the example of a religion that believed people shouldn't work after age 60: Could they legally ban older people from employment? Of course, they could do neither. This is indeed an issue of religious freedom: the freedom of non-Catholics not to be bound by the dictates of the Catholic Church in the workplace.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/reason_v_hysteria_in_the_birth_control_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s threat to a poor Silicon Valley city</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New America Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12325781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>EAST PALO ALTO, Calif. -- A baby blue billboard displaying a giant thumbs-up hand, the iconic Facebook “Like” symbol, stands on the corner of Willow Road and the 84 freeway, facing Menlo Park. It marks the entrance into the new campus of Facebook, the Internet giant that just recently filed for an IPO, minted a new crop of multimillionaires, and has just moved into this newer, bigger home – the former campus of Sun Microsystems.</p><p>The Like sign may just reflect the sentiments of the city of Menlo Park, a mostly affluent suburb that is sure to receive a windfall in taxes from the arrival of its new tenant, which has made the city the new center of Silicon Valley.</p><p>But the sign is also turned away from East Palo Alto, a neighboring low-income community of color adjacent to Menlo Park. That city will be the gateway to Facebook for many commuters and may be the future home of some of the 9,000-plus employees who are expected to work at the new location. And while the rest of the Valley celebrates the expansion of the new company that is redefining how the world communicates and uses technology, East Palo Alto residents say they see more of the same: another powerful Silicon Valley corporation that will benefit at the expense, and perhaps displacement, of their city.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s unprecedented war on whistleblowers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_unprecedented_war_on_whistleblowers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_unprecedented_war_on_whistleblowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12325371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On January 23rd, the Obama administration <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/25/us/john-kiriakous-path-from-ambitious-spy-to-federal-defendant.html">charged</a> former CIA officer John Kiriakou under the Espionage Act for disclosing <a href="http://cryptome.org/2012/01/kiriakou/0059.pdf">classified information</a> to journalists about the waterboarding of al-Qaida suspects. His is just the latest prosecution in an unprecedented assault on government whistleblowers and leakers of every sort.</p><p>Kiriakou’s plight will clearly be but one more battle in a broader war to ensure that government actions and sunshine policies don’t go together. By now, there can be little doubt that government retaliation against whistleblowers is not an isolated event, nor even an agency-by-agency practice. The number of cases in play suggests an organized strategy to deprive Americans of knowledge of the more disreputable things that their government does. How it plays out in court and elsewhere will significantly affect our democracy.</p><p><strong>Punish the Whistleblowers</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_unprecedented_war_on_whistleblowers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 23rd, the Obama administration <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/25/us/john-kiriakous-path-from-ambitious-spy-to-federal-defendant.html">charged</a> former CIA officer John Kiriakou under the Espionage Act for disclosing <a href="http://cryptome.org/2012/01/kiriakou/0059.pdf">classified information</a> to journalists about the waterboarding of al-Qaida suspects. His is just the latest prosecution in an unprecedented assault on government whistleblowers and leakers of every sort.</p><p>Kiriakou’s plight will clearly be but one more battle in a broader war to ensure that government actions and sunshine policies don’t go together. By now, there can be little doubt that government retaliation against whistleblowers is not an isolated event, nor even an agency-by-agency practice. The number of cases in play suggests an organized strategy to deprive Americans of knowledge of the more disreputable things that their government does. How it plays out in court and elsewhere will significantly affect our democracy.</p><p><strong>Punish the Whistleblowers</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_unprecedented_war_on_whistleblowers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_unprecedented_war_on_whistleblowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adelson&#8217;s other pet project: The Israeli right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12325211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JERUSALEM — As more and more people wonder how long Newt Gingrich will persevere against the growing inevitability of a Mitt Romney victory, one man appears to be holding firm: Sheldon Adelson, the Las Vegas casino mogul who just poured another $5 million into Gingrich’s coffers.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a>Superficially, the two men appear to have little in common. Gingrich, 69, is a lifelong politician and consummate Washington insider whose trajectory has famously taken him through three wives and three religious renderings: the Lutheranism of his birth, the adaptable Southern Baptism of most of his adult life, and now, a Bible-thumping new Catholicism.</p><p>Adelson, 78, born to Jewish Ukrainian immigrants in Dorchester, Mass., crawled his way out of the New England working class and, in addition to his vast wealth, is known for a stable and enduring second marriage to Miriam Ochshorn Adelson, with whom he has two children.</p><p>She is apparently the key to the one subject that links the two men, the country of her birth, Israel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/adelsons_other_pet_project_the_israeli_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s winning hand on religion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12320161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama's strategy of  “reaching out to” or “appealing to” religious voters has proven to be <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/3698/">ineffective electorally</a> and counterproductive for policymaking. As much as Obama seems to understand the complexities of American religion, he listens too much to the voices of religious leaders who want the government to accommodate their edicts regardless of the impact on everyone else. The spoils go to the ones with access, to those who sit in the valued “seat at the table” in Washington.</p><p>After decisively issuing the contraception coverage rule last week, the administration took only a few news cycles, dominated by liberal Catholics like <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/5655/four_catholic_men_v._obama/">E.J. Dionne</a> fretting about how Obama “botched” the issue, to dispatch surrogates to assuage the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/obamas_winning_hand_on_religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On birth control, Romney mirrored Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12321371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cracking down on contraception was never the way for Mitt Romney to ingratiate himself with voters in Massachusetts, even the Roman Catholics who mostly see it as a moral neutral. Now that that position is coming back to haunt Romney like the ghost of Christmas past, he's taking cover with the religious right. And after last night’s surprising three-state sweep by social conservative Rick Santorum he'll need all the cover he can get.</p><p>Some Catholic leaders in Massachusetts are already (finally) speaking up against what they see as Romney’s politically convenient about-face in the emergency contraception debate. C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts, told Salon he didn't want to "let Romney off the hook because the initial injury to Catholic religious freedom came not from the Obama administration but from Romney's administration"; he explained that there was a preexisting exemption for religious institutions already in the Massachusetts law that was stripped out on the advice of Romney’s gubernatorial legal counsel. "President Obama's plan certainly constitutes an assault on the constitutional rights of Catholics, but I'm not sure Governor Romney is in a position to assert that, given his own very mixed record on this."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/on_birth_control_romney_mirrored_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proof that Romney really doesn&#8217;t care about the poor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12322241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>David Cay Johnston, tax reporter extraordinaire, <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2012/02/07/how-romney-would-tax-us/">takes a close look</a> at Romney's tax proposals and discovers something that will be worth repeating as we get closer to the general election: Romney <em>really</em> doesn't care about the poor.</p><p>Romney's plan, writes Johnston, "would raise taxes on the poorest 125 million Americans while tilting tax cuts further toward the rich."</p><p>Here's how:</p><blockquote><p>President George W. Bush cut taxes for almost everyone who paid income taxes. Romney would make the Bush tax cuts permanent. But that’s only a first step.</p>
<p>He would also raise taxes on poor families with children at home and those going to college.</p>
<p>Romney does this by reducing benefits from the child tax credit and the earned income tax credit and by ending the American Opportunity tax credit for college education.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/proof_that_romney_really_doesnt_care_about_the_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Proposition 8, two judges rule</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12319751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Save the confetti.</p><p>The two Democratic appointees to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the California prohibition of gay marriage -- the infamous Proposition 8 -- violated the U.S. Constitution. Following the cautious counsel of a group of friends of the court, seasoned activists not part of the new litigation group that brought the suit, longtime liberal giant Judge Stephen Reinhardt passed up the opportunity to produce the gay Brown v. Board of Education.</p><p><em></em>Instead Reinhardt ruled on the narrowest possible grounds that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional, because it took away gays’ preexisting right to marry, extended to them a few months before by the California Supreme Court. No other state, not even the other states in the territory covered by the 9th Circuit, is affected by the ruling.</p><p>The opinion is an explicit appeal to Justice Kennedy, who wrote the original pro-gay Supreme Court opinion in Romer v. Evans<em>,</em> which involved a law that took away gay rights. It practically parrots the language of his opinion verbatim, offering him the opportunity to affirm their ruling and still duck the question of whether there is an overall constitutional right to same-sex marriage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/on_proposition_8_two_judges_rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeremy Lin&#8217;s social media fast break</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12317601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We live in fickle times, but this is ridiculous. New York, suddenly, has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/sports/basketball/jeremy-lin-has-burst-from-nba-novelty-act-to-knicks-star.html">gone nuts</a> over Jeremy Lin, an Asian-American, Harvard-educated point guard who has played only <em>two</em> good games for the NBA's hapless Knicks. And that's just the beginning: In China, Lin's name was <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2012/02/07/oh-the-lin-sanity-china-has-a-new-basketball-hero/?mod=WSJBlog&amp;mod=chinablog">among the top-10 search terms</a> on Monday on Sina Weibo, the Chinese equivalent to Twitter. Last Friday, most of the world hadn't heard of him. Today, you could make a case he's the most famous Asian-American athlete since Tiger Woods. Which is just kooky. No question, Lin played really, really well against the New Jersey Nets and Utah Jazz over the weekend, but that hardly makes him the second coming of Oscar Robertson.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog proves the Onion is trusted news source</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12313641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Abortionplex" in Topeka, Kan. -- with its three-story nightclub, pet adoption center and "more than 2,000" abortion-ready rooms -- is just as fictional today as it was last May, when <a href="http://www.theonion.com/articles/planned-parenthood-opens-8-billion-abortionplex,20476/">its opening was "announced" in the Onion</a>. But this much was apparently not obvious to Rep. John Fleming, R-La., who <a href="http://www.newser.com/story/139106/gop-rep-fooled-by-onion-s-abortionplex-story.html?utm_source=dailydigest&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=20120207">recently posted the Onion piece to Facebook</a> as an alleged example of Planned Parenthood's offensiveness.</p><p>Others were not so easily fooled, and Fleming was soon the object of mockery on Hudson Hongo's blog, <a href="http://literallyunbelievable.org/">"Literally Unbelievable,"</a> which chronicles "stories from The Onion as interpreted by Facebook." Turns out people are even more gullible than you might think.</p><p>"Like many of my posts, this picture was submitted by one of my readers," Hongo tells me over email. "I'm lucky to have a readership that is quick-eyed and knows to always take a screenshot first." Hongo answered a few of my questions about his self-styled online "museum of human gullibility" -- and chose a few of his favorite moments from nearly a year's worth of amusingly unnecessary exasperation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/blog_proves_the_onion_is_trusted_news_source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

