<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Oscars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/category/oscars_2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How &#8220;Life of Pi&#8221; anticipated 9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/a_boy_a_boat_and_a_tiger_life_of_pi_as_contemporary_fable_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/a_boy_a_boat_and_a_tiger_life_of_pi_as_contemporary_fable_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life of Pi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yann martel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ang Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Published the same month as the attacks, Yann Martel's novel offers a prescription for life post-catastrophe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a><br /> PERHAPS THE BIGGEST SURPRISE at the 2013 Oscar ceremony was that Ang Lee beat out Steven Spielberg for Best Director with his adaptation of Yann Martel’s novel <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0156027321/?tag=saloncom08-20">Life of Pi</a></em>. Martel’s novel was itself a surprising Man Booker Prize award winner in 2002. You may remember that a controversy followed: according to some, Martel’s book, about a boy in a lifeboat with a tiger, was suspiciously similar to that of Brazilian author Moacyr Scliar’s 1981 novella <em>Max and the Cats</em>, about a man in a lifeboat with a jaguar. In a short essay titled “<a href="http://www.powells.com/fromtheauthor/martel.html" target="_blank">How I Wrote <em>Life of Pi</em></a>,” Martel has accounted for the influence that Scliar’s novel — or rather, what he recalls as John Updike’s negative review of the novel in <em>The New York Times Book Review </em>— had on him. (In fact, Updike never seems to have reviewed the book at all, and the only review that ran in <em>The</em> <em>Times</em> was positive.) Martel — who claims he only read <em>Max and the Cats</em> after the accusations of plagiarism surfaced in 2002 — borrowed Scliar’s basic premise, trying to turn it into a novel that was more successful than the one Updike had allegedly reviewed:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/a_boy_a_boat_and_a_tiger_life_of_pi_as_contemporary_fable_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/a_boy_a_boat_and_a_tiger_life_of_pi_as_contemporary_fable_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama to blame for North Korea?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/is_obama_to_blame_for_north_korea_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/is_obama_to_blame_for_north_korea_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong-un]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A global security expert weighs in on whether the president's brinkmanship has jeopardized the Korean peninsula]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> BOSTON — It's been a busy week for North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.</p><p>Over just a few days, he has unilaterally nullified the 1953 armistice with South Korea; vowed to restart his uranium enriching and plutonium programs; and <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/north-korea/130403/north-korea-military-strike-nuclear-united-states" target="_blank">issued "final approval"</a> for "merciless" nuclear strikes against the United States.</p><p>He taunted South Korea's new leader, and shut down the Kaesong industrial estate, which served as unusual example of cooperation between the two Koreas. Most recently, he <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/130404/north-korea-nukes-kim-jong-il-KN08-musudan-nuclear-weapons-pyongyang" target="_blank">transported a missile</a> to the east coast — either in an attempt to lob a warhead in America's general direction (he lacks the capability to actually hit the continent), or more probably, to test it, perhaps on the April 15 birthday of deceased founding father Kim Il Sung. "Is there a more bizarre and frightening figure in the world today than North Korea's young, impetuous and untested leader?" <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/commentary/north-korea-kim-jong-un" target="_blank">writes</a> GlobalPost senior foreign affairs columnist Nicholas Burns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/is_obama_to_blame_for_north_korea_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/is_obama_to_blame_for_north_korea_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Graham: &#8220;Average viewer would not be able to guess Karen Finney is African-American&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tim_graham_average_viewer_would_not_be_able_to_guess_karen_finney_is_african_american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tim_graham_average_viewer_would_not_be_able_to_guess_karen_finney_is_african_american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative media mouthpiece would like you to know that he does not think Karen Finney is black enough ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a series of Twitter responses to the announcement that Karen Finney would be hosting a new show on MSNBC, Tim Graham, director of media analysis at the conservative Media Research Center, said that Finney's skin is not dark enough for the "average viewer" to guess that she is African-American.</p><p>Finney served as the first African-American spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee and has been an MSNBC political analyst and guest host since 2009.</p><p>Tim Graham has been a Media Research Center "watchdog" since 1989. He has been a racially clueless idiot probably since forever.</p><p>Here are his tweets:</p><p>[embedtweet id="319180589049724929"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="319190014498062337"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tim_graham_average_viewer_would_not_be_able_to_guess_karen_finney_is_african_american/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tim_graham_average_viewer_would_not_be_able_to_guess_karen_finney_is_african_american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ll tell you what&#8217;s funny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bernhard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Seth MacFarlane's shtick really sexist? Yes, and also no — he fell afoul of the mysterious rules of comedy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humor is a complicated phenomenon, and highly dependent on context, as <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/seth_macfarlane">Seth MacFarlane</a> recently learned. The Oscar host’s much-discussed performance – and in particular his quasi-ironic opening musical number, “We Saw Your Boobs” – has inadvertently launched a cultural debate about several interlocking subjects, including sex and gender in Hollywood, whether p.c. attitudes are destroying humor, and the role of Twitter and other social media during major cultural events. That’s without even getting into the unresolvable and inherently subjective question of what’s funny and what’s not.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/the_week_in_10_pics_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/the_week_in_10_pics_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope Benedict XVI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Boehner's sequester face to Jennifer Lawrence's charming klutziness, a look at the week's enduring images]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From Boehner's sequester face to Jennifer Lawrence's charming klutziness, a look at the week's enduring images]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/the_week_in_10_pics_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to do outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Done right, Internet griping can shame Seth McFarlane and ruin Todd Akin. Done wrong, it's phony, Dowd-esque shlock]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been a banner week in near-universal opprobrium. I say <em>near</em>-universal, because in the department of backlash to the backlash, there are already claims that the Internet has merely emboldened the "humor police," whether it's criticizing Seth MacFarlane's Oscar <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_misogynistic_oscar_host/">hosting</a> or the Onion's supposedly brave <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_vile_quvenzhane_wallis_tweet/">joke</a> about a 9-year-old girl. So let me offer a conditional defense of outrage politics.</p><p>Take the misogyny and bigotry on display at the Oscars Sunday, and everything that followed. Salon's Andrew Leonard may be right when he <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/twitters_unstoppable_humor_police_were_all_hate_watchers_now/">says</a> that "in our pre-Twitter past, we might have simply turned off the TV or switched channels once MacFarlane started singing his dumb song about boobs. But now we stay watching to share our hate!" (Wait, how can we <em>know</em> what people did before Twitter? Maybe I can put a call out on Twitter.) Sharing that "hate" en masse happens to be a communal experience, something that has its own virtues in this atomized, time-shifted age. But it also exorcises demons that without something specific on which to fix righteous rage, are suppressed or implicitly accepted by society. Everyday slights and institutional discrimination are hard to point out on your own. Watching them on a screen or finding them in a tweet helps make them visible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California lawmakers call out the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for sexism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/california_lawmakers_call_out_the_academy_of_motion_picture_arts_and_sciences_for_sexism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/california_lawmakers_call_out_the_academy_of_motion_picture_arts_and_sciences_for_sexism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a letter to the academy, lawmakers wrote Seth MacFarlane "reduced our finest female actresses to caricatures"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two California state lawmakers have joined <a href="http://jezebel.com/5987118/sexism-fatigue-when-seth-macfarlane-is-a-complete-ass-and-you-dont-even-notice" target="_blank">other</a> <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2013/02/why-seth-macfarlanes-misogyny-matters.html" target="_blank">smart</a> <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2013/02/the-banality-of-seth-macfarlanes-sexism-and-racism-at-the-oscars/273460/" target="_blank">men</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_misogynistic_oscar_host/" target="_blank">and</a> <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/02/seth-macfarlane-and-the-oscars-hostile-ugly-sexist-night.html" target="_blank">women</a> in condemning Oscar host Seth MacFarlane's comments during Sunday's awards presentation.</p><p>Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal and Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, both Democrats who lead the Legislature's women's caucus, sent a letter to Academy president Hawk Koch on Tuesday calling on the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to use "better judgment" when selecting a host for next year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/california_lawmakers_call_out_the_academy_of_motion_picture_arts_and_sciences_for_sexism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/california_lawmakers_call_out_the_academy_of_motion_picture_arts_and_sciences_for_sexism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben&#8217;s right: Marriage is work. That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad thing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Garner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oscar winner's raw, awkward thank-you to his wife gave us a glimpse into the reality of married life  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Ben Affleck picked up the Oscar Sunday night for "Argo," the actor/producer/director/<a href="http://youtu.be/lGeqX-OBo0Q">Jimmy Kimmel love slave</a> turned those boring last minutes of the broadcast into a memorably strange statement about marriage. As he looked out at his beautiful wife, Jennifer Garner, he told her – and the world – "I want to thank my wife, who I don't normally associate with Iran. I want to thank you for working on our marriage for 10 Christmases. It’s good. <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/love-sex/ben-affleck-thanks-jennifer-garner-for-working-on-their-marriage-153803671.html">It is work, but it’s the best kind of work, and there’s no one I'd rather work with."</a> And if nothing else had happened the entire broadcast, it would have been worth it for the pinched, "Honey, <em>whaaaaaa</em>?" smile on Garner's face as he said that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tina Fey: &#8220;No way&#8221; would I host Oscars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tina_fey_no_way_would_i_host_oscars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tina_fey_no_way_would_i_host_oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget about it -- Fey and Amy Poehler might be dream Oscars hosts, but she says it isn't going to happen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tina Fey and Amy Poehler are on most everyone's short list to host the Oscars, after their star turn at the Golden Globes and the unfunny douchebaggery of Seth MacFarlane.</p><p>But Fey <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/26/tina-fey-oscars_n_2768362.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">told </a>the Huffington Post that she has no interest in the job. "I just feel like that gig is so hard," she said. "Especially for, like, a woman -- the amount of months that would be spent trying on dresses alone ... no way."</p><blockquote><p><strong>The reaction to Amy and you hosting the Golden Globes was really great.</strong><br /> Oh, thank you. We had fun.</p> <p><strong>It's disappointing to hear, "No way." I was hoping for at least "a one in a million chance."</strong><br /> I wish I could tell you there was.</p></blockquote><p>Anyone you would like to see host next year? Leave your thoughts in the comments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tina_fey_no_way_would_i_host_oscars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tina_fey_no_way_would_i_host_oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We saw your junk&#8221;: The inevitable parody arrives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_junk_the_inevitable_parody_arrives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_junk_the_inevitable_parody_arrives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We Saw Your Junk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We saw your boobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTuber Kevin Gisi takes on the men -- thanks for reminding us that we've seen Dustin Hoffman's junk ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RD5NLYjBiQA" frameborder="0" width="440" height="248"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_junk_the_inevitable_parody_arrives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_junk_the_inevitable_parody_arrives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anne Hathaway: Hollywood&#8217;s most polarizing star</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/anne_hathaway_hollywoods_most_polarizing_star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/anne_hathaway_hollywoods_most_polarizing_star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight Rises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princess diaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway has so much trouble winning over the public. Is it a gender double-standard — or is it her face?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Hathaway has it all: The movie star jumps between lucrative studio pictures like "The Dark Knight Rises" and and passion projects like "Rachel Getting Married." She recently wed boyfriend Adam Shulman in a Valentino gown. And her occasional missteps haven't hurt her one bit -- potential career-enders like "One Day" and "Get Smart" give way to bigger and better movies. Her former boyfriend's imprisonment for running a Ponzi scheme was brushed aside. She flopped as an Oscar host in 2011, but came back to win the best supporting actress trophy for "Les Misérables" at this year's ceremony.</p><p>And her public finds it all <em>so infuriating.</em></p><p>Hathaway is the subject of more vituperative, angry scrutiny than perhaps any actress working today. "<a href="http://www.crushable.com/2012/11/10/entertainment/anne-hathaway-hosting-saturday-night-live-snl-les-miserables-the-devil-wears-prada-princess-diaries-528/">Shut up. Shut up, Anne Hathaway.</a> I honestly don’t know what it is. Maybe I’m jealous, but I don’t feel jealousy. I watch her in outtakes, and I feel like she’s not a real person," wrote a blogger for women's-interest site Crushable. "I don’t find her perfection charming. I find it <em>annoying</em>."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/anne_hathaway_hollywoods_most_polarizing_star/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/anne_hathaway_hollywoods_most_polarizing_star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>167</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We Saw Your Boobs&#8221; celebrates rape on film</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_boobs_is_a_celebration_of_rape_on_film/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_boobs_is_a_celebration_of_rape_on_film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Seth MacFarlane, did you know many of those "boob" scenes you sang about were depictions of sexual assault?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth MacFarlane has made millions off being an immature man-child. In fact, it was the success of his particular brand of gross-out offensive humor (served with a smile, of course) that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/don%E2%80%99t_blame_seth_macfarlane/" target="_blank">got him the Oscar gig</a> in the first place.</p><p>So it came as little surprise, then, when base misogyny and racism dominated MacFarlane's performance on Sunday. And while the musical opener "We Saw Your Boobs" has been called immature (true) and sexist (also true) -- it wasn't just a harmless roundup of spicy movie scenes. Four of the films MacFarlane crooned about featured nudity during or immediately following violent depictions of rape and sexual assault, stripped of their context and played for laughs. Scarlett Johansson found herself on the list because of a real-life violation: Her nude photos were stolen from her phone and leaked online.</p><p>Oh, your privacy was invaded and your breasts were splashed across the Internet against your will? That is <em>hilarious</em>!</p><p>So let's talk about those "boob" scenes and see how "funny" they play in context.</p><p><strong>"The Accused"</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_boobs_is_a_celebration_of_rape_on_film/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/we_saw_your_boobs_is_a_celebration_of_rape_on_film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>391</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to mock a child</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/there_is_a_way_to_make_fun_of_a_child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/there_is_a_way_to_make_fun_of_a_child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quvenzhané Wallis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Mansbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go the Fuck to Sleep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis CK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane and the Onion failed. But mocking kids can be great]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, everybody who thinks we're the PC police: It's not that you can't make a joke about a child. It's that the rules of comedy apply no matter the subject matter -- you have to be <em>funny</em> about it.</p><p>As we all well now know, Oscar night 2013 will be remembered as that time Seth MacFarlane made joshing reference to Quvenzhané Wallis as an imminent object of George Clooney's sexual attentions, and then the Onion drastically upped the ante by calling her <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_hipster_racism/">"kind of a cunt."</a> (They later deleted and apologized for it.) The backlash to both outbursts was swift and loud, followed inevitably by the "Can't you take a joke?" backlash to the backlash.</p><p>One of the most agonizing side effects of a controversial comedy routine – generally a crude one that involves <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/dont_heckle_daniel_tosh/ ">violence</a>, <a href="www.salon.com/2011/03/15/gilbert_gottfried_japan_tweets/">tragedy</a>, or is at the expense a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/10/tracy_morgan_homophobic_rant/">minority group</a>  -- is the scramble to explain why some things are funny and some are not. And explaining a joke is only slightly more magic-defusing than watching how sausage is made. Comedy is alchemy. The minute we say, "That's not funny because…" we risk the approbation of those who'd call us humorless scolds, uptight and fussy party poopers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/there_is_a_way_to_make_fun_of_a_child/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/there_is_a_way_to_make_fun_of_a_child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seth MacFarlane says he won&#8217;t host Oscars again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/seth_macfarlane_says_he_wont_host_oscars_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/seth_macfarlane_says_he_wont_host_oscars_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't expect the host of the 85th Academy Awards to be back any time soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on how you viewed "Family Guy" and "Ted" creator Seth MacFarlane's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/twitter_slams_oscars_host_seth_macfarlane/">polarizing performance</a> at the Oscars ceremony on Sunday, you will either be saddened or elated to know that MacFarlane is not likely to ever host the awards show again. MacFarlane recently tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="306316660833386496"]</p><p>These celebrities are probably pretty be happy about this announcement:</p><p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/saHG2MLDfPI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p>But MacFarlane also deflected some of the criticism directed towards his jokes, including the above boob song, by tweeting and retweeting the following:</p><p>[embedtweet id="306315487304876032"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="306063431243534336"]</p><p>Despite the criticism, ratings for this year's Oscars were up since last year; 40.5 million viewers tuned in to watch, according to Nielsen, beating last year's show hosted by Billy Crystal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/seth_macfarlane_says_he_wont_host_oscars_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/seth_macfarlane_says_he_wont_host_oscars_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Colbert on the Oscars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/must_see_morning_clip_colbert_on_the_oscars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/must_see_morning_clip_colbert_on_the_oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Colbert Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle Obama presenting Best Picture was "big government out of control," Colbert said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Colbert was outraged to report that Michelle Obama presented the award for Best Picture at Sunday's Oscars, what he called "big government out of control."</p><p>"Now the private sector can't even broadcast its own self-congratulatory strokefest without federal intervention?" Colbert asked. "What's next, regulatory limits on how much Joaquin Phoenix can eat during the ceremony?"</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:colbertnation.com:424141" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/must_see_morning_clip_colbert_on_the_oscars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/must_see_morning_clip_colbert_on_the_oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Onion staffers angry over Wallis apology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/onion_writers_angry_over_wallis_apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/onion_writers_angry_over_wallis_apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quvenzhané Wallis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a crude and vile tweet about a 9-year-old actress, the Onion's CEO apologized. His writers aren't happy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fallout from the Onion's crude tweet about Oscar nominee Quvenzhané Wallis continues.</p><p>The tweet, which described the 9-year-old "Beasts of the Southern Wild" star <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_vile_quvenzhane_wallis_tweet/">using a vulgar anatomical term</a> in order to seemingly mock the way the media describes starlets, was deleted shortly after being published. It was, perhaps, of a piece with the satirical publication's general tone of irreverence -- which is perhaps why the apology from the newspaper's CEO has struck such a wrong note with Onion employees.</p><p>"No person should be subjected to such a senseless, humorless comment masquerading as satire," <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/how_could_the_onions_quvenzhane_wallis_tweet_go_so_wrong/">wrote the CEO, Steve Hannah</a>.</p><p>"My reaction was, 'It wasn't a great joke, but big deal,'" one former Onion editor <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/cjlotz/former-onion-staffers-denounce-ceos-apology">told BuzzFeed</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/onion_writers_angry_over_wallis_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/onion_writers_angry_over_wallis_apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscar posters that should have been</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonrise Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wreck-It Ralph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the movie posters that Mondo Gallery commissioned for this year's crop of Oscar movies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Check out the movie posters that Mondo Gallery commissioned for this year's crop of Oscar movies]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seth MacFarlane to Rush Limbaugh: Now I understand why conservatives hate the media</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvey Weinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush says he sent MacFarlane a mash note, and compares Michelle Obama's Oscar appearance to something out of Orwell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth MacFarlane has another admirer: Rush Limbaugh.</p><p>On Monday's radio broadcast, Limbaugh <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/02/25/the_one_of_a_kind_limbaugh_take_on_the_academy_awards">said</a> he sent the widely derided Oscars host an "attaboy note." MacFarlane's response, according to Rush? "You know what? I kind of understand how you conservatives feel about the media now."</p><p>Limbaugh was fired up about the Oscars, and saw evidence of a liberal conspiracy to create a totalitarian world, and also a political tug-of-war between Steven Spielberg and Harvey Weinstein.</p><p><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/02/25/the_one_of_a_kind_limbaugh_take_on_the_academy_awards">Speaking</a> of Michelle Obama's appearance via video link to hand out the best picture Oscar with Jack Nicholson, Limbaugh said:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Lawrence&#8217;s fall to grace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/jennifer_lawrences_fall_to_grace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/jennifer_lawrences_fall_to_grace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schadenfreude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Golden Globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meryl Streep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David O. Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter's Bone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Mirren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may have been nice to see the youngest or oldest actress nab an Oscar. But J.Law's win was worth the trip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, a debate broke out among our friends on whether the 22-year-old Jennifer Lawrence, now crowned by the academy as the best actress for her terrific performance in "Silver Linings Playbook," will have staying power. One insisted she was a flash in the pan. The rest of us, who first fell hard for her in "Winter's Bone," argued that she really does have the chops. Who can say, really. Remember, Dr. Haing S. Ngor won an Oscar for his brilliant performance in "The Killing Fields," and that was pretty much the last we saw of him. So, only time will tell how her career pans out, though she's poised — with the Hunger Games franchise, and a<a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/david-o-russell-reteaming-with-jennifer-lawrence-again-on-the-ends-of-the-earth-20130219"> new deal to reteam with David O. Russell</a> — to stick around for a while. Really, the question that lingers is: Why are young women held to such scrutiny?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/jennifer_lawrences_fall_to_grace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/jennifer_lawrences_fall_to_grace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Onion&#8217;s hipster misogyny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_hipster_racism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_hipster_racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quvenzhané Wallis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being ironic and self-aware and knowing something is offensive doesn't make it funny -- or OK ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>I turned off the Oscars a short while after M.C. Seth MacFarlane’s “<a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=sideboob+mcfarlane+link&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank">We Saw Your Boobs</a>” routine. The skit was framed by a stern-looking William Shatner playing "Star Trek’s" Captain Kirk, returned from the future. He was chastising MacFarlane for the trashy routine that Kirk predicted he would soon be doing. There was very little funny about it, and a quick pan of the audience revealed a bunch of famous women not laughing — including Charlize Theron — who nevertheless “classed up” the trashy routine by following up with a ballroom-style dance with Channing Tatum.  I’m not sure how Theron felt about it, given her subsequent participation, but I’m assuming my response was somewhat shared by many of the straight-faced actors in the audience.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_hipster_racism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_hipster_racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>