<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann again tries to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the 34th time, legislation has been introduced into Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently still unfazed by the Supreme Court's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/roberts_wrote_both_obamacare_opinions/">ruling</a>, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., announced today that she introduced legislation into the new Congress to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act.</p><p>Bachmann tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="286909118814511104"]</p><p>According to a report by <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57470643/health-care-repeal-effort-worth-the-time/?tag=stack">CBS News</a> in July, the then-33 unsuccessful attempts by House Republicans to repeal the law had used up around 80 hours of time in Congress, or two full work weeks, at a cost of around $48 million.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems introduce high-capacity magazine ban in the House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Flake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana DeGette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Diana DeGette represents the Colorado district that includes Columbine High School]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., introduced a ban on high-capacity magazines in the House earlier today, the first day of the new session of Congress.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22304452/degette-introduces-bill-ban-large-magazines">AP</a>, DeGette introduced the bill with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., whose husband was killed in a 1993 mass shooting on the Long Island Rail Road in New York. From the AP:</p><blockquote><p>[DeGette]'s district includes the site of the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School. It is also adjacent to last year's Aurora movie theater shooting site. In both of those attacks, the shooters' rifles were modified with high-capacity magazines. Those devices allow attackers to fire dozens of bullets without pausing to reload.</p></blockquote><p>Though it's still unclear whether a ban can pass the Republican-controlled House, there were some promising signs from at least one Republican earlier today.</p><p>Rep. Peter King, also from New York, <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/peter-king-i-really-dont-know-why-people">said</a> on "Morning Joe": "I voted for the assault weapon ban back in 1994. My father was a police officer. I really don't know why people need assault weapons."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Far right loses its collective mind over possible gun legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three weeks after Sandy Hook, Tea Partyers and right-wing bloggers are hinting at civil war if the government acts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" align="left" /></a> Whether the massacre of 20 Connecticut first-graders and six educators by a madman armed with an assault rifle in December will lead to meaningful gun control legislation is far from certain.</p><p>But nearly three weeks after the Dec. 14 bloodbath, the American far right – from elements of the Tea Party to bigoted bloggers to conspiracy theorists – is working itself into an absolute frothy uproar at even the possibility that it may become more difficult to purchase a military-style assault rifle or a magazine that carries dozens of bullets.</p><p>It’s reminiscent of the reaction that surrounded the 1994 assault weapons ban that expired in 2004. That legislation, which applied only to newly manufactured guns, helped fuel a powerful militia movement – one that has been eclipsed by the recent surge in the anti-government “Patriot” movement, which includes armed militias.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Senate delays gay marriage floor vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats say the bill does not yet have enough Republican support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) -- Illinois Senate Democrats are delaying a vote on a plan that would make the state the 10th in the nation to legalize gay marriage.</p><p>A spokeswoman for Senate President John Cullerton tells The Associated Press the proposal to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples will get a committee hearing Thursday but there aren't currently enough votes to pass it on the floor.</p><p>Spokeswoman Rikeesha Phelon (rih-KEE'-shuh ful-AHN') says she doesn't know how many votes there are for the plan or when it might be called. Some Democrats were not in attendance Thursday. Phelon says no Republicans supported it.</p><p>Cullerton's Democrats have 35 seats in the Senate - five more votes than needed for passage.</p><p>The Legislature is in lame-duck session until Jan. 9, when the new session is sworn-in.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British xenophobia on the rise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whites are now one of London's minorities. And with the economy in turmoil, many are lashing out at immigrants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a> LONDON, <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/united-kingdom">UK</a> — At the Bestco International supermarket on central Edgware Road, British customers can stock up on staples of Twinings tea and HP sauce. Muslims can buy freshly butchered halal chicken, while homesick Poles can buy distinctly non-halal pork kielbasa imported from Silesia.</p><p>Browsing local store shelves offers a simple way to gauge the ethnic mix of any London neighborhood. With its eclectic range of East European and <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/middle-east">Middle Eastern</a> fare, Bestco is typical for catering to the various nationalities that have recently flocked here to forge new lives.</p><p>Unscientific as they are, such snapshots reflect a more detailed picture that emerged last month when the government published the results of its first census in a decade. It was a moment in which Britain looked at itself in the mirror — and barely recognized what it saw.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama signs NDAA again, disappoints on Gitmo and civil liberties again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indefinite Detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second year in a row, the president signs into law a bill he purports to have major problems with]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time last year, President Obama said that he had "serious reservations" about certain provisions of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. But he signed it anyway. This year, the same provisions over which he was so reserved remain in the 2013 version of the bill, along with a number of brand-new problematic amendments. The president threatened a veto on the new bill's prohibitions on closing Guantánamo Bay detention center. But he didn't veto; he signed the bill again on Thursday.</p><p>Once again, Obama expressed his misgivings in a <a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2013ndaa.stm_.rel_.pdf.pdf">signing statement</a>, but stressed that "the need to renew critical defense authorities and funding was too great" to reject the bill, which approved a $633 billion armed forces budget for the 2013 fiscal year. Also approved in the NDAA are controversial provisions that will likely make closing Guantánamo Bay detention center impossible in Obama's presidency, and provisions elsewhere in the act that allow for the indefinite military detention of U.S. citizens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do millennials care about abortion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview, NARAL's president tells Salon it's time a new generation leads. But she's not sure they will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Roe v. Wade's 40th anniversary, NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan, 60, announced she would celebrate by stepping down and handing the reins to a younger generation -- the same one she had been <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2010/04/nancy-keenan-re-1.html">arguing</a> for years lacks the pro-choice intensity and commitment of her own.</p><p>Formed originally to repeal abortion bans before Roe, NARAL is now most closely associated with lobbying on the federal and state level, and for its close ties to the Democratic Party. Keenan's departure after eight years follows an election cycle when Democrats didn't apologize for being pro-choice -- and won.</p><p>This last election year also featured unprecedented public mobilization, across generations, on issues around abortion, birth control and rape. Two men, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, most closely associated with a total abortion ban lost Senate bids they'd seemed poised to win. Akin, too, came from a House of Representatives where antiabortion and anti-family planning legislating had seemed like a full-time job, but whose actual legislative victories have been few.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton to return to work next week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secretary of State will return to Washington after being treated for a blood clot in her head]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department says Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to return to work next week after being treated for a blood clot in her head.</p><p>Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland says Clinton is resting at home but is speaking with senior staff and is, quote, "sounding terrific, upbeat and raring to go."</p><p>She says Clinton looks forward to returning to her Washington office next week, although a date hasn't been set. Doctors have advised her to avoid international travel for now.</p><p>Clinton was discharged Wednesday from a New York hospital, three days after doctors diagnosed a blood clot during a follow-up exam stemming from a concussion she suffered in December. Doctors are treating the clot with blood thinners and say they expect she will fully recover.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly a year after stroke, Kirk returns to Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nearly_a_year_after_stroke_kirk_returns_to_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nearly_a_year_after_stroke_kirk_returns_to_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nearly_a_year_after_stroke_kirk_returns_to_senate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Illinois Republican returned to the Capitol on Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Nearly a year after a debilitating stroke, Sen. Mark Kirk is back at work in the Senate.</p><p>The Illinois Republican climbed the steps of the Capitol on Thursday and claimed his Senate seat.</p><p>Kirk was greeted at the foot of the Capitol steps by Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday. Biden and Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia were at Kirk's side as Kirk used a four-pronged cane to climb the 45 steps.</p><p>He earned rousing applause from fellow senators, the Illinois congressional delegation and others.</p><p>Kirk waved and smiled. He paused several times to greet well-wishers.</p><p>During his recovery from the stroke, the senator endured an intensive, experimental rehabilitation regimen that is often compared with military boot camp because of its intensity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nearly_a_year_after_stroke_kirk_returns_to_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nearly_a_year_after_stroke_kirk_returns_to_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner holds on to speaker post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite some defections, the Ohio congressman will serve another two years as speaker of the House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner squeaked by in a vote for speakership this afternoon, getting 220 votes of 426 cast, just  a handful of votes over the number needed to hang on to his seat.</p><p>There were, however, a total of 14 defections from both Boehner, and Nancy Pelosi, who got 192 votes.</p><p>House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Va., got three votes. Reps. Louie Gohmert, Texas, and Paul Broun, Ga., both cast votes for ousted Rep. Allen West, Fla.</p><p>Tim Huelskamp, Kan., one of the four conservatives Boehner ousted from his committee spot, cast a vote for Jim Jordan, Ohio. Dave Schweikert, Ariz., another one of those conservatives, did support Boehner.</p><p>Both Michael Grimm and Peter King of New York, who had been at odds with Boehner over Hurricane Sandy relief funding, both voted for the speaker to keep his seat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOM pledges to target Illinois GOPers who back gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nom_pledges_to_target_illinois_gopers_who_back_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nom_pledges_to_target_illinois_gopers_who_back_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The threat came shortly after the state Republican Party chairman said he would support it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Illinois gears up for a vote over whether to legalize same-sex marriages, the National Organization for Marriage says it will target any Republicans who support the legislation.</p><p>In a statement Thursday, NOM said it will form a PAC in Illinois and spend $250,000 to oust any Republicans who support gay marriage. The statement also called on Illinois Republican Chairman Pat Brady to resign "for violating the national GOP platform and urging state Republicans to redefine marriage."</p><p>“Any Republican in Illinois who betrays the cause of marriage will be casting a career-ending vote and will be held accountable to their constituents,” Brian Brown, NOM’s president, said in a statement. “We will spend whatever it takes – hundreds of thousands of dollars if necessary – to remove them from office, just as we did three of the four turncoat Republican state Senators in New York who were responsible for gay ‘marriage’ passing there."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nom_pledges_to_target_illinois_gopers_who_back_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/nom_pledges_to_target_illinois_gopers_who_back_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Obama a break on the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habeas corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president deserves credit for his handling of the crisis -- so long as he doesn't cave on the debt ceiling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> When President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1862 (a couple of times, actually), he conceded the possible unconstitutionality of what he had done but concluded that since the move was necessary in a time when half the country was at war with the other half, he would take his chances with Congress, the courts, and history. The country’s current chief executive finds Lincoln comparisons disconcerting, but this is a case where he might pay attention, because his legal grounds for unilaterally raising the ceiling on the national debt in a time of congressionally inflicted crisis are no weaker than Lincoln’s and probably stronger.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleric &#8220;gang rape&#8221; story debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cleric_gang_rape_story_debunked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cleric_gang_rape_story_debunked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheikh Mohammad Al-Arifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AlterNet retracts a story that claimed a Saudi religious leader made outrageous claims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon re-published a story Wednesday from one of our partner sites, AlterNet, with the headline "Saudi religious leader calls for gang rape of Syrian women." The story reported that cleric Sheikh Mohammad Al-Arifi had urged Syrian fighters to satisfy their sexual urges in "short-term marriages" as a means of boosting morale in their fight against the Assad regime. AlterNet has since retracted the story, saying it was "based on a false report," and <a href="http://www.alternet.org/world/exhibit-how-islamophobic-meme-can-spread-wildfire-across-internet" target="_blank">published an explanation</a> for how a story so flawed could be published. Salon has removed the story from our archives, and regrets running the original story.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cleric_gang_rape_story_debunked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cleric_gang_rape_story_debunked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weakened Boehner still likely to hang on to speakership</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House speaker has been lambasted by multiple factions within the GOP, but he's likely to retain his title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though House Speaker John Boehner is poised to hang on to his speakership in Thursday's vote, he enters the new session of Congress considerably weaker than the last.</p><p>Boehner has been hearing it from both flanks of his caucus, with 151 members of his own party voting against the "fiscal cliff" deal, and Republican New York Reps. Peter King and Michael Grimm expressing outrage that Republican leadership failed to call a vote over Hurricane Sandy relief aid.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/275335-boehner-pelosi-facing-defections-as-house-votes-for-speaker">The Hill</a> reported this morning:</p><blockquote><p>Boehner could also face opposition from the four Republicans punished this month for bucking leadership. Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), Walter Jones (N.C.) and Dave Schweikert (Ariz.) were all stripped of their committee posts by the Boehner-led GOP Steering Committee, and they've been grumbling ever since.</p> <p>There has been speculation that 17 Republicans could join forces and deny Boehner the majority he needs to become Speaker. House rules dictate that a lawmaker must receive a majority of the votes in order to get the Speaker's gavel. Republican lawmakers, including one who is not fond of Boehner, said no such effort is under way.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian women segregated on public transportation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of a 23-year-old's brutal rape and murder, a look at some of the country's antiquated safety measures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a> Safety while traveling in cities has been an especially stubborn obstacle for women in India, as an increasing number of them join the workforce and are out later at night.</p><p>But the brutal gang rape of a 23-year-old woman on a bus in Delhi on Dec. 16 has now thrown the issue of women's safety in India into sharp relief.</p><p>The victim, who passed away Saturday from injuries sustained during the assault, had boarded a privately operated bus with a man<a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/india/121230/delhi-gang-rape-victim-planning-her-wedding" target="_blank">said to be her fiance</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-20753075" target="_blank">The BBC had reported</a> the vehicle was a "white line" bus, one of several services run by private operators to supplement the city's public bus network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans face Tea Party backlash after &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are eyeing Republican primaries after their leadership pushed through the "fiscal cliff" deal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are facing potential backlash from Tea Partyers for supporting the "fiscal cliff" deal, which wound up passing without the support of many of the more conservative members of the party.</p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/03/us-usa-fiscal-teaparty-idUSBRE90200U20130103">Nick Carey of Reuters</a> reports that in the Senate, Tea Party groups are eyeing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Ky., Saxby Chambliss, Ga., Lindsey Graham, S.C., and Lamar Alexander, Tenn., all of whom are up for reelection in 2014.</p><p>"Many people here have watched Mitch McConnell's voting record and are dissatisfied with what they've seen," Eric Wilson, executive director of the Tea Party group the Kentucky 9/12 Project, told Reuters. "There are some potential candidates working in the background and doing the right thing."</p><p>"If a credible candidate comes forward, then Saxby Chambliss is in major trouble," said Debbie Dooley, a founder of the Atlanta Tea Party.</p><p>"I am over 90 percent certain that if there is a reliably conservative candidate in 2014 he will have my total support," Joe Dugan of the Myrtle Beach Tea Party in South Carolina also told Reuters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Intelligence Council: U.S. is a &#8220;global security provider&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Intelligence Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The center's new "Global Trends 2030" offers a predictably myopic view of America's future place in the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it as a simple formula: if you’ve been hired (and paid handsomely) to protect what is, you’re going to be congenitally ill-equipped to imagine what might be.  And yet the urge not just to know the contours of the future, but to plant the Stars and Stripes in that future has had the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) in its grip since the mid-1990s.  That was the moment when it first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">occurred</a> to some in Washington that U.S. power might be capable of controlling just about everything worth the bother globally for, if not an eternity, then long enough to make the future American property.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real test for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_real_test_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_real_test_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How he navigates the coming debt ceiling crisis will tell us whether he cut a sensible deal on the "fiscal cliff"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 113<sup>th</sup> Congress will convene for the first time at noon today, and barring an unforeseen morning development, it will in one of its first act elect John Boehner as speaker.</p><p>Boehner has been an unusually weak speaker, one who has little power to bend his own party’s rank-and-file to his will and little space to cut deals with the other party. That’s not about to change, as his handling of the fiscal cliff showdown demonstrated, which is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_humiliation_of_john_boehner/">why I wondered a few weeks ago</a> why he’d want to sign up for two more years. But he evidently is willing to pay the price, and we saw on Tuesday night exactly what that means. As <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/275295-boehner-tells-gop-hes-done-with-one-on-one-obama-talks">The Hill reported</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is signaling that at least one thing will change about his leadership during the 113th Congress: he’s telling Republicans he is done with private, one-on-one negotiations with President Obama.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_real_test_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_real_test_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, East Coast Republicans, but this is your party too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor helps the GOP keep power -- then doesn't like the results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spare me, Chris Christie. The New Jersey governor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/chris_christie_gops_toxic_politics_to_blame_for_delayed_sandy_aid/">delighted political reporters</a> with his theatrical excoriation of the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives after Speaker John Boehner refused to allow a bill funding aid for people affected by Hurricane Sandy to come to the floor for a vote this week.</p><p>This would be the same Christie who, in September 2012, headlined <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81052.html">a fundraiser for Iowa congressman Steve King</a>, who is not just one of the craziest members of the GOP crazy wing, but who also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/31/steve-king-hurricane-sandy_n_2047553.html">announced a month later that he probably wouldn't vote for relief money for Sandy victims</a> for the same reason he refused to vote for federal aid for victims of Hurricane Katrina: Because he was pretty sure people spent the relief money on "Gucci bags and massage parlors." This is a man Christie wanted to win reelection, in order to help Republicans maintain control of the House of Representatives, so that they could continue ignoring the priorities and desperate needs of liberal, urban coastal states like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>