| |||||
| Books Comics Health & Body Media Mothers Who Think News People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Project Travel & Food ![]() Columnists
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - Also Today For a full list of today's Salon Arts & Entertainment stories, go to the
Arts & Entertainment home page. - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon Arts & Entertainment Column Movie Review Movie Review Movie Review Complete archives for Arts & Entertainment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
"Making film is making music"
- - - - - - - - - - - -
July 1, 1999 |
Reviewers have either embraced the picture's audiovisual seductions or
berated the extravagance (or "vulgarity") of its showmanship. I'm on the side
of the seduced. When critics complain of the gaudiness of having one of the
unifying characters be a 17th century Tarot card reader and the other an
obsessed latter-day art dick, they deny the fun of the romantic tradition,
which derives not merely from virtuosity and lushness, but also from pagan
alchemy and pantheism and unbridled longing. The same criticisms aimed at
"The Red Violin" have been leveled at its near-namesake, "The Red Shoes," for
more than 50 years -- which hasn't kept the prima ballerina of dance critics,
Arlene Croce, from saying, "There really is no other ballet film." As François Girard showed during a recent stop in San Francisco, he's a
persuasive advocate of cinema as "the seventh art that draws on all the
others." A Quebec native who speaks fluent, French-accented English, Girard
said, "Between my feature films I always go into different experimental
projects that are connected with the other arts, and these feed into my
feature film work." Culturally savvy and inventive movie director/writer
teams -- like Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger in "The Red Shoes" and
Girard and Don McKellar in "The Red Violin" -- have always been
intent on bringing older arts to wider audiences while prodding viewers to
respond in novel ways, educated prejudice be damned. In 1993, Girard and
McKellar collaborated on a smaller-scale milestone called "Thirty-Two Short
Films About Glenn Gould" -- a movie that, like "Citizen Kane," caught an
enigmatic character in a prismatic laser. Michael Sragow Michael Sragow's column appears every Thursday in Arts & Entertainment + Archives
"The Red Violin" is more lavish and engulfing -- an epic with a violin as hero. Just as "The Red Shoes" combined wizardly ballet excerpts with intertwining stories about fateful toe shoes and a demonic impresario, "The Red Violin" makes unparalleled use of an original score for violin and orchestra to vivify the tale of a fateful fiddle and the archetypal figures who fall under its spell. (John Corigliano composed the music; Joshua Bell plays it with supreme passion.) In the 1600s, a Cremona master brings the red violin to opulent, supernal life. In 1792, an Austrian boy prodigy and French music teacher take it to the Viennese court, with disastrous results. In 1893, a traveling troupe of gypsies introduce it to an English composer/violinist, who uses it as a libidinous muse. And in 1965, Chinese music lovers protect it from the anti-Western ravages of the Cultural Revolution. But not until the late 1990s does an instrument appraiser, Charles Morritz (Samuel L. Jackson), uncover the staggering secrets of its sublime look and tone -- right before a scheduled auction in Montreal. All the while, Girard cuts rhythmically from the individual episodes to the Tarot card-reader's predictions and Morritz's efforts to grasp the reasons for the violin's perfection. The result justifies Girard's belief that "making a film is making music, and painting and also writing -- it's all those things together." You like to collaborate with Don McKellar on screenplays that zigzag and double back on themselves. Are you the Quentin Tarantino of high art? This is the first time anyone has made connection between me and Tarantino, but I think that he has real skill at structural writing -- in fact, he's brilliant that way. Both of us like to expose the structure of a film to the audience. It invites the audience to contribute to films creatively, imaginatively. It's in the act of viewing that a film is really finished; it finds its final form in the minds of the people who are watching it. I find it silly to try to pretend to the audience that everything in a movie is all one continuous flow. The audience is very smart, and has seen a couple of thousand films and I don't know how many hours of television. So everybody's a film expert, everybody's an editing expert, everybody knows what it means to add sound and music to scenes and connect fragments. To deny that awareness on the part of the audience is to cut yourself off from huge opportunities. The films that deny those possibilities drive me crazy -- I hate those films.
| ||||
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.