"The Rainmaker"

Woody Harrelson brings his trademark touch of self-parody to the Broadway stage.

Woody Harrelson is ideally cast as Starbuck, the con man in love with his own con, in the new Broadway revival of N. Richard Nash's "The Rainmaker." He brings his trademark wised-up bumpkin presence to the role, his mad satyr's grin, his unmistakable touch of self-parody. Scott Ellis' production for the Roundabout Theatre Company (which premiered in a limited run at the Williamstown Theatre Festival last year) is beautifully crafted and deeply pleasurable, but it's Harrelson who brings it to life.

He needs to, because that's the way the play -- a 1954 hit now best known for the movie version starring Burt Lancaster and Katharine Hepburn -- is constructed. It's set in a tiny, mid-Depression Midwestern town whipped by a long drought; the drought is an emblem for the female protagonist, Lizzie Curry (Jayne Atkinson), who's heading for spinsterhood. Starbuck appears out of the windless night, claiming implausibly that he can conjure up a storm for a hundred bucks, and puts an end to both dry spells.

Nash's play is hokey and homiletic, and there's no music in the lines. Starbuck corners Lizzie, pointing out the nervousness that, along with her pragmatic dismissal of his boastfulness, conceals her sexual terror, and you long for the poetic intensity that Nash's contemporary, Tennessee Williams, could imbue a similar encounter with in a play like "The Eccentricities of a Nightingale."

Instead you have to settle for the usual brand of Broadway-drama speechmaking as the characters tell glaringly obvious home truths about each other. They've been drawn mostly to fulfill functions. Lizzie has a wise, loving father (Jerry Hardin, in a sweet-natured performance) and two brothers who stand at opposite ends of the spectrum: the elder, Noah (John Bedford Lloyd), the practical one, who runs the farm and says things like "Drought's a drought, and a dream's a dream," and the younger, Jim (the immensely likable David Aaron Baker), who's driven by his hormones.

Sense-talking Noah continually tries to control Jim -- to take him down a peg, to harness his youthful wildness -- but Starbuck champions the boy, just as he fights for Lizzie when Noah tells her to face up to the fact that she's doomed to be an old maid. Lloyd gives a believable performance in a bummer of a role -- a man whose confidence in his own eternal rightness sours everyone's milk. And Ellis gets as much cartoon humor as he can out of the early scenes between the brothers, playing Lloyd's rangy cowhand looks against Baker's toad-hopping energy so they're like a squabbling Mutt and Jeff.

Ellis and the actors deserve a lot of credit: Nothing exposes the limitations of Nash's imagination more than the joshing male exchanges in this play, especially the one where Lizzie's father and brothers try to entice the laconic deputy sheriff, File (Randle Mell), into courting her. Mell is suitably sturdy and he has an amiable low-key humor, but emotionally repressed File, who can't admit his wife ran off on him, is almost as crummy a part as Noah. (The biggest mistake the play gets by with is matching him up with Lizzie, whom we love.)

Still, Nash is no fool. The play has an inner spring: When Starbuck connects with Lizzie, firecrackers go off. Hepburn played Lizzie with a breathless lyricism, as if she were hanging off the edge of the world, and she made a touching joke out of the character's gawkiness and her rural manners -- and of course there was no other way she could make us accept the most aristocratic of Yankee actresses in the role of a back-country spinster.

Atkinson doesn't try to play against Nash's language -- she grounds the character in it. Big-boned, plainspoken, she hauls her suitcase wearily across the stage at the top of the play (Lizzie has just returned from a fruitless trip to visit some eligible young men in a neighboring town) and you understand exactly who this woman is. When her family persuades her it's a good idea to invite File home for supper, she puts on a cool silk dress (Jess Goldstein designed the letter-perfect costumes), but her legs give her away -- she doesn't walk like a woman who truly believes she looks good in that dress. Atkinson gets at Lizzie's feelings directly and then, without a fuss, she crawls inside them. It's a superb piece of acting.

In Act II, Harrelson's Starbuck leads Lizzie downstage center, takes down her hair and tells her she's pretty, making her repeat it over and over until she believes it, and with Atkinson it's clear how much she wants it to be true and how scared she is that it won't be. Hepburn played this climactic moment by making herself beautiful -- by exposing, suddenly, the swan lurking inside the ugly duckling. In Atkinson's reading the scene is about something else entirely -- about emerging sexuality, which carries its own tremulous beauty. When Starbuck kisses her she sinks to her knees, presses her eyes shut and turns away from him as if she were holding on to a desperate dream.

Harrelson doesn't duplicate the free-flung athleticism Lancaster had in the Starbuck role, and it takes him a scene to warm up after a rather stiff entrance. But his hound-dog approach to this character is sensationally effective. He's irresistibly clownish -- you can see why people are happy to be suckered by him. When he delivers his big monologue about the first time he made rain, he peeks out of the corner of his eye to see how Lizzie's taking it -- to check whether he's turning her on yet. This grinning goof loves his hard sell so much he turns himself on.

Harrelson's bio doesn't list any previous stage work, but he's as charismatic here as he is on screen, and he and Atkinson work wonderfully together. Nash's dramaturgy is as square as they come, but the Sunday-matinee audience at the Brooks Atkinson Theatre responded joyfully to it, as did the audience at Williamstown when I saw the earlier version. (Except for Harrelson, who replaces Christopher Meloni, the cast is the same.) This is a canny mounting of a crowd-pleasing entertainment -- skillfully staged, with a scruffy, rough-hewn appeal.

"The Rainmaker" is a fable about how faith carves a fairy tale out of the workaday realities -- Starbuck's vision of Lizzie unmasks her beauty, while her belief in him transcends his fakery and brings the rain. All three designers -- James Noone did the sets, Peter Kacrowoski the lighting -- balance realism and stylization to carry that theme. Noone's work is particularly fine: The unmoving windmill, realist symbol of the long drought, stands below a slightly fantastical drop with miniature cut-out farmhouses, each one lit up and plunked down on a broad twist of road like the landscapes in David Hockney's English-countryside paintings. And Starbuck's and Lizzie's love scene takes place under a misty white moon that peers out of a huge expanse of sky.

The characters in "The Rainmaker" discover that they have to live somewhere between reality and their dreams. Ellis and his collaborators are dreammakers with their feet on the ground, able to take a banal play such as this one and release the magic in it.

In the news

Loading...

Currently in Salon