Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

 
 

Salon.com

[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Comics ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ][ Audio ]

Article Finder
Arts & Entertainment Movies


 

Hollywood kicks the habit | 1, 2, 3


Soderbergh does better on the resource issue. The Mexican cartels are far richer and better outfitted than both Mexican cops and the most sophisticated branches of American law enforcement. The traffickers are also more ingenious, more technologically advanced and more ruthless -- plus they reap huge financial rewards. They'll throw drugs at the border, knowing that some of it will make it and some of it won't, and that the profits will more than cover the losses in any case. It's like a big department store padding prices to cover the damages of shoplifters.

Soderbergh's trying to stun us, to overwhelm us, to dump a load of information on us and get us to just talk about how absurd and complicated and impossible this thing that we're still fighting as a nation is. But he always knowingly undercuts the most heavy-handed of it; when one character goes off on a tirade against two DEA agents, one of them asks him if he thinks he's on "Larry King Live."



"Traffic" movie trailer

RealVideo Play
Windows Media 56k | 300k



Print story


E-mail story


View Salon privately with SafeWeb


That's why a film like "Traffic" is so important. Movies with social or political agendas rarely accomplish much. Oliver Stone never got the files he demanded at the end of "JFK." "Fight Club" probably didn't dent Ikea's take. And people still smoke cigarettes and watch "60 Minutes" despite "The Insider."

But debates about the power of pop culture -- does it reflect or direct society? -- are better left to dorm rooms. These movies do spark national conversations, and if there's going to be any real change in American drug policy it's going to have to come from the bottom up. After many, many conversations -- when legalization, or at least decriminalization, becomes self-evident.

Some, like the folks at NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), think that there's a major shift in the way we as a country think about drugs. They'll point to good signs, like Republican Gov. Gary Johnson in New Mexico, who favors legalizing marijuana and heroin, or medical marijuana referendums in California and Arizona. And now they can point to "Traffic." But realistically we're going to be rolling joints in the dark for a long time.

Most politicians still can't afford to look soft on drugs. In this year's presidential election, for example, only Ralph Nader and Libertarian Harry Browne broached the subject. Because of his didn't-inhale fiasco, Bill Clinton hadn't much to say on the subject until very recently, in the 11th hour of his presidency, when he suggested that we at least look at decriminalizing pot. And now we've got a president-elect with a similar problem: George W. Bush's "youthful indiscretions" and the Republican Party's law-and-order platform will likely keep any drug reform out of the executive branch.

But as the small documentary "Grass" pointed out this summer, it was middle-class families losing their children to prison who pushed Nixon to relax drug laws in the early '70s -- when some states decriminalized marijuana.

The real drug czar knows that a major part of the war on drugs is a war of images and messages. With the Partnership for a Drug Free America and the most sophisticated advertising agency in the world, it spends millions on advertising, inserting messages into television shows and magazines and even fighting popular referendums. "Traffic" is a cannon shot from the other side.


salon.com

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Jeff Stark is the associate editor of Salon Arts and Entertainment.

Sound Off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

Related stories
Prime-time propaganda
How the White House secretly hooked network TV on its anti-drug message: A Salon special report.
By Daniel Forbes
01/13/00

Salon on the war on drugs
A complete guide to our coverage of the nation's drug policy

Steven Soderbergh
It's been a very hot year for the director of New York Film Critics Circle favorites "Traffic" and "Erin Brockovich." Next year may be hotter still.
By Stephen Lemons
12/20/00

Salon.com >> Arts & Entertainment
 


 



Don't get sunburned!Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




Extra goodies and great services in
Salon Plus

____
 
   
 
____
 



 
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • Torture porn, made beautiful Pasolini's "Salò" blends fascism, de Sade and upscale art cinema into the most notorious film in the medium's history. Watch it at home!
    Andrew O'Hehir
  • Doc Hudson vs. Che Guevara Paul Newman's crusty, kid-friendly, oddly classic final role (as a car). Plus: Film-world eggheads battle over Soderbergh's unconventional "Che."
    Andrew O'Hehir
  • Big Think: Lisa Randall on how some things will be known The theoretical physicist discusses her work on understanding extra dimensions of space and string theory.
  • From Cannes headliner to pay cable Why is the exasperating and delightful "Pleasure of Being Robbed" -- a breakthrough American micro-indie about a charming female sociopath -- barely getting released?
    Andrew O'Hehir
  •  

    shim shim shim shim shim shim shim
    shim
    shim

    Now playing: Read all the recent movie reviews by Salon's critics

    shim
    shim



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Tech & Business and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright 2005 Salon.com


    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy