Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

Salon.com


[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Business ][ Comics ][ Health & Body ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ]

Article Finder
Arts & Entertainment TV


 


Richard deserved to win
His surprise victory showed age and cunning triumphing over youth and idiocy.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Joan Walsh

Aug. 24, 2000 | After all the initial whining about age discrimination on "Survivor" -- because the first two rejects, Sonja and B.B., were among the oldest castaways -- there was little comment when it came to pass that of the remaining 14 survivors, the three oldest made it into the final four.

And I was among the millions rooting silently for any of the aged, evil three -- Rudy, Sue, even Richard -- to beat the callow, conniving Kelly.




Print story


E-mail story


Backflip This Story  Backflip this story to find it again


Rooting silently, because envy and resentment of the young is a fact of life, but it isn't pretty. Babies are cute; we won't kill them when they're colicky. Air-headed twentysomethings have no such protection from nature. Especially when they get covered with bug-infested sores (Colleen), call women dumber than cows (Gervase), or whine about their "beauties," the young daughters inexplicably abandoned for prime-time fame (Jenna).

I had to acknowledge my unconscious ageist bias midway through "Survivor," when members of the ultimately triumphant Tagi, tribe of the evil and aged, kept losing immunity challenges to the youthful, hard-bodied, weak-brained Pagong -- and I found myself rooting for them to come back and win.

When the Tagi prevailed, and the tribes merged, it was clear the Pagong were dead meat. The Tagi camp became the group home -- the mature folks had of course worked harder and fashioned more creature comforts -- and then the Pagong got picked off one by one by the evil Tagi alliance: Rudy, Sue, Richard and Kelly.

Dim-witted and inexperienced, too, the Pagong members first refused to acknowledge the Tagi alliance, and then, when it was undeniable, didn't have the savvy to strike back by forming a voting bloc of their own.

I enjoyed watching their little torches getting snuffed out each week, and I realized I was rooting for Rudy, of all people: the homophobic Navy SEAL who was nonetheless the only person who managed to combine a value like loyalty with a potentially winning game plan -- and the only person, besides maybe Richard, likely to know how to stay alive 39 days if "Survivor" had really been about survival.

When it came down to Richard vs. Kelly, though, age wasn't the main factor prompting me to root for Rich. I just didn't like Kelly, the tongue-studded river guide, with all of her pretension to higher values than Richard had.

The only thing worse than a manipulative prick like Richard is someone pretending to be honest. Don't you remember people like Kelly from the dorms, or your first job? She'd learn your birthday, your little sister's name and your favorite ice cream flavor, then -- sadly, and with real remorse -- steal your boyfriend.

Kelly played the Tagi against the Pagong after the merger, but ultimately returned to the Tagi alliance -- again, with real remorse.

Her vote against Sue, once it got down to the final four, was the triumph of self-interest over her values, and it killed her in the end. Sue's vicious, heartfelt final speech was the dramatic pinnacle of "Survivor," and her rage at Kelly once again revealed the vulnerability the screwed-up Wisconsin truck driver displayed during the show's other emotionally raw moment -- when Sue confessed Kelly was her first real friend since her best friend died 20 years ago.

It was heartwarming, in this exuberant, youth-worshipping dot-com economy, to see age, cunning and even Richard's girth triumph over the carelessness, sanctimony and failed manipulation of youth. Yes, it's a little scary that a corporate trainer won the $1 million. But it's even scarier that it was, in the end, so easy.

Maybe Richard's victory will force people to think more about how easily they're manipulated -- or "ma-nipple-ated," in Sue's memorable phrase -- on the job, at home, or by television. ------



Poll

Who's right about Richard?


Janelle Brown
Joan Walsh

Show Results


salon.com | Aug. 24, 2000

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Joan Walsh is the editor of Salon News.

Sound Off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

Related stories
"Survivor," complete
Barfing! Backbiting! Richard's big white ass! An episode-by-episode guide to the Darwinian high jinks of CBS's island castaways -- right up to the surprising conclusion.
By Joyce Millman, Jeff Stark and Bill Wyman
06/28/00

Richard knows best
The naked schemer of "Survivor" answers to child abuse charges -- with child abuse.
By Beth Broeker
08/24/00

Salon.com >> Arts & Entertainment
 




 



Don't get sunburned!Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




More great offers in
Salon Plus

____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • Critics' Picks What you need to see, read, do this week: Indie rock for Barack, a time capsule of late-'80s bohemia, a peek at other people's diaries.
  • Don't call it mumblecore Ultra-indie American film grows up in a hurry with Joe Swanberg and Greta Gerwig's erotic, wrenching relationship drama "Nights and Weekends."
    Andrew O'Hehir
  • "Happy-Go-Lucky" Sally Hawkins gives the finest performance of the year in Mike Leigh's intimate masterpiece.
    By Stephanie Zacharek
  • "Greatest film ever" or a cream cake? Mocked on initial release and long unavailable, Max Ophüls' wide-screen spectacle "Lola Montès" returns in a lustrous restoration. So what's the big deal?
    Andrew O'Hehir
  •  

    Now playing: Read all the recent movie reviews by Salon's critics



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Business | Comics | Health | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Technology and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright © 2000 Salon.com
    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy