Editor:
Updated: Today
Topic:

Miley Cyrus

The week in Miley Cyrus pole-dancing outrage

What makes the teen star's rump-shaking performance depressing isn't that it's shocking; it's that it's so familiar
Krista Kennell/Sipa Press via AP
California- Singer Miley Cyrus arrives at the 2009 Teen Choice Awards in Universal City, California.

The Miley Cyrus Teen Choice Awards debacle is the pop culture gift that just keeps on giving. To recap: Sunday evening the most famous 16 year old in the world showed up on the red carpet in a high-heeled, bra-flaunting, crotch-skimming ensemble straight out of the spring tranny hooker catalogue. She then changed into shiny short shorts and boots to perform "Party in the USA," a routine that featured her at one point cavorting around a pole on top of an ice cream truck. Disney teen queen plus stripper accoutrements? Let the frothing begin!

Since Broadsheet first wrote about it on Monday, the web has lit up with criticism of the routine with expected vigor and surprising durability. As of this morning there are now 2,750,000 Google entries for “Miley Cyrus + pole.” There have been over 1,300 articles written on the subject. The LA Times said the performance went "too far and too low." The NJ.com parenting blog referred to it as “idiocy” and “bad behavior.”

Cyrus, like any other girl, is negotiating that murky era between childhood and womanhood – she just gets to do it in front of the world. Being sexual is part of being 16, even for America’s sweetheart. But though Cyrus did indeed strut around and, at one point, dip it down low, the more salacious moment came earlier in the song, when she shimmied with a quartet of aggressively rump shaking would-be Scores girls. Cyrus, for her part, told MTV before the show that her performance was intended to represent her southern roots and “being so proud of where I’m from.”

With her powerful voice, classic beauty, and billions in sales, she’s probably figured out she doesn’t have to trade exclusively on hoochie to get ahead. As she matures, she’ll likely be able to hang on to her younger “Hannah Montana” fans while she vies for the attention of a new audience of masturbation enthusiasts.

As the mother of two girls myself, I generally try to avoid knee jerk “what about the chiiiiiiiiiildren?” horror. And I firmly believe the only person whose job it is to be their role model is me. Nevertheless, there is something undeniably dispiriting about watching a young woman whose songs celebrate intelligence and ambition shaking her ass like any other prefab Pussycat Doll. What makes Cyrus’s performance depressing isn’t that it’s shocking; it’s that it's so fucking familiar. It’s that homogenization of eroticism, the way that the gentleman’s club is the template for so much of what passes for entertainment from a female, that’s such a bummer. It’s the choreographic crutch of Britney. Beyonce. Fergie. Rihanna. It’s not enough to have looks and talent, whatever your age, you should probably also dress and move like you carry your wages in your thong.

When my 9-year-old daughter watched the clip today, she was underwhelmed, declaring the dancing “just okay.” She had no judgment, and I didn’t suggest one. She did however ask me why her idol was dancing in her underpants. Cyrus herself is likely equally unruffled. Right on schedule, “Party in the USA” debuted yesterday in the Billboard Top 40.

"Hannah Montana: The Movie"

Miley Cyrus, preteen queen, brings her hit TV show to the big screen. Relax, parents: It's not completely painful!

Is it just me or does Hannah Montana -- the pop-star alter-ego of the regular, ordinary girl played by Miley Cyrus in the movie version of the hit TV show, helpfully titled "Hannah Montana: The Movie" -- look a little blowsy? I don't mean tarty, like a 14-year-old who strives to look older by wearing shiny eye makeup and club gear -- that would make sense. There's just something a little matronly about Hannah, with her blond wig and pouty face, decked out in high-heeled boots and dangly earrings, that reminds me of a suburban matron who's overshot her prime before she's even reached it. As role models go, she's safe to the point of being a little pathetic.

Cyrus is just 16, around the age of the characters she's playing, and the show, like the movie, is targeted to girls who are much younger. (Yes, some boys may like it too, but for convenience' sake, I'm going to stick with the female pronoun.) The concept, at its core, is simple and brilliant. Cyrus' regular-girl character, Miley Stewart, has always dreamed of being a singer, but she also wants to have a normal teenage life. So she strikes a deal with her father, Robby Ray (played by Cyrus' real-life dad, Billy Ray): As her sunny, somewhat baby-faced brunette self, she'll go to school and do regular teenage stuff. But she also has the freedom to don the aforementioned blond wig and perform in the guise of Hannah Montana; only her family and her closest friend (played by Emily Osment) know her secret. That way, as she puts it in one of her chirpy, cheerful songs, she gets to live in the best of both worlds. As Hannah Montana she temporarily ceases to be a sheltered little girl and instead becomes a free agent, a performer who gets to try on the clothes, and the persona, of an adult sexual being.

Whether or not you think this idea is harmful for kids is up to you, but I very clearly remember being 6 years old and believing that someday I'd grow up to be either Emma Peel or Honey West, the character played by Ann Francis in the short-lived '60s TV show of the same name. (She was a private detective who wore black leotards and kept a pet ocelot in her bachelor-girl apartment.) I can assure you that, much to my disappointment, I grew up to be neither, but at least I now understand what the fantasy was about: It allowed me to try on the idea of being a glamorous, sexy adult without having to deal with the attendant responsibilities and complexities. I could always return to the safety of being a kid, which is the central notion behind "Hannah Montana."

The double-identity concept is laid out very clearly in "Hannah Montana: The Movie," so even if you have an Amish child who's never seen television, you can be assured she'll understand the movie's logic perfectly. (Why you'd be bringing such a child to the movies in the first place is between you and the elders.) Those of you who will be dragged to the theater this weekend might want to know that the plot of "Hannah Montana: The Movie" is slender but serviceable: Robby Ray believes Miley is becoming too wrapped up in the whole Hannah Montana thing, and wants her to forgo an important engagement to attend the birthday party of her grandmother (played by the wonderful actress Margo Martindale) in Tennessee. Miley doesn't want to comply, but she's tricked into it. The good news is that a former grammar-schoolmate of hers, Travis Brody (Lucas Hill), has grown up to look like a Bruce Weber model, complete with cowboy hat and artfully fitted-but-worn-in plaid shirt, and now works on her grandmother's farm.

Assorted conflicts and adventures ensue, and the movie overall is painless if not exactly electrifying. (The director is Peter Chelsom, the English filmmaker and actor who has previously made some very entertaining films for grown-ups, including the 2001 romantic comedy "Serendipity" and the 1991 charmer "Hear My Song." The script is by Daniel Berendsen, based on characters created by Michael Poryes, Richard Correll and Barry O'Brien.) Miley Cyrus, as Miley Stewart, is appealing enough, albeit in a too-cute way. She simply needs to fill the expectations of her millions of pint-size fans, which she does with exacting professionalism.

And it's not her fault that as Hannah, she has that trying-too-hard look. Maybe it's the movie's makeup artists who failed her -- as Hannah, she just doesn't look fresh and dewy enough, as even a teenage pop star ought to. And the wig looks a little too much like something Flip Wilson might wear as his own alter ego, Geraldine.

Worst of all for Cyrus, Taylor Swift -- not just a kiddie sensation but an exceptionally talented singer-songwriter -- makes a brief appearance in the movie as herself. Swift is a cool, composed performer, but she also comes off as genuine, while Cyrus is merely gen-u-eyn. In her very small cameo, Swift unintentionally but definitively upstages poor Hannah Montana. Little girls won't notice that now, but someday when they're older, and having a second look, they'll make the distinction. For now, they just need to worry about being little girls, and that's plenty.

Zac Efron and the twilight of the teen idol

The "High School Musical" pinup wants to shed his cheesy image. Can he succeed? Plus: A look at the heartthrobs who made the leap to adult fame. Video

There is a time in every young teen idol's life when he must ditch the tan bronzer and try to make a go of some adult career. This is always fascinating to watch, because it signals the chance, however slight, for a real person to claw his or her way through the plastic, to veer off-script in an industry that has, up until this moment, micromanaged every last Ryan Seacrest interview. This is the moment that separates the Justin Timberlakes from the Joey Fatones. Many dewy youths have fallen in their attempts at this career juncture, and they have the drinking habits and the VH1 reality shows to prove it.

And so we have arrived at Zac Efron's moment. In this month's Interview magazine, the well-scrubbed 21-year-old star of "High School Musical" loosens the shackles of his pukka-shell necklace and undergoes a dirty-sexy makeover -- black-and-white photos feature him rolling in the mud with a naked model (Lithuanian Edita Vilkeviciute), her pert nipples visible, and looking like he is 15 years late to Chris Isaak's "Wicked Game" video shoot. The whole package is a self-conscious attempt to rescue Efron from the sea of Disney banality in which he has been dog-paddling for some time: The artsy cover ominously declares, "Zac Efron Is the Future." The interview is conducted by beloved indie director Gus Van Sant -- a man whose stamp of approval is so coveted by young Hollywood that it became a plotline in HBO's "Entourage" -- and the pair gab about vintage furniture and Efron's upcoming period film with Richard Linklater, "Me and Orson Welles." The repeated message here is that you won't have Zac Efron to sing your four-part harmonies anymore. On Tuesday came the announcement that Efron had pulled out of his starring role in the remake of "Footloose," a part that seemed to seal his fate as a song-and-dance plaything for tween America and the next logical step in his retread of vapid '80s teen idoldom. Ditching that part is possibly the most interesting thing Efron has done in his career -- which is, admittedly, a short list, including the time he told Elle magazine that his mom bought him an economy box of condoms. 

Even in the pantheon of bland teen stars, Efron always seemed particularly animatronic. (That's not even his real voice in the original "High School Musical," though he insisted on singing in the sequels.) With his '50s-era Boy Scout good looks, annoyingly windswept bangs, and the made-for-the-tabloids romance with Vanessa Hudgens, Efron has never been much more than a punching bag for those of us over 10 years old. When Rolling Stone declared him the "New American Heartthrob" in 2007, it seemed to be saying more about its own desperate bid for relevance than anything else. "As long as I stay boring, I think I'll be fine," Efron said in the cover story. And there did not seem to be any danger of him doing otherwise. Which is another reason why this moment is exciting: He could have sucked on the bong of "HSM" for years, living a cozy existence fortified by Teen Choice awards, in which the most serious question he faced was whether or not he liked to wear makeup

I don't mean to suggest that by splattering mud on his face and pressing his pecs against a naked lady, Efron will suddenly morph into Johnny Depp. Depp displayed hints of his talent even in his earliest roles, whereas Efron's chops have yet to manifest. In fact, it's a bit squirm-inducing to hear about Efron's artistic aspirations, however fledgling and undefined they are. "I'm getting a list of great films on my iPhone," he told Gus Van Sant, "and every time somebody mentions one, I try to go out and watch it." (He just saw "Ordinary People." Verdict? "I was amazed.") His next film is "17 Again," a hokey-sounding age-inversion film in which he plays a 37-year-old stuck in the body of a teenager, which is not likely to land him on anyone's Oscar shortlist.

Nevertheless, there's something invigorating about a teen idol attempting to wriggle free of his constraints. It's a gamble for a star whose fame relies on the conflicted desires of the young girls (and boys) who adore him, in part, for his androgyny, because he is unthreatening, sweet and cuddly as a puppy. No matter how sexualized our culture becomes, the overwhelming success of "High School Musical" -- in fact, of every teen idol -- confirms that kids crave the soft-focus fantasy of romance and sexuality while keeping all the dirty, nasty stuff at arm's length. (Hello, Jonas Brothers.) Trying to transition into a more grown-up role is the sword on which so many beloved teen idols have fallen. But whether he can pull a Depp or a Timberlake, or whether he winds up as the next David Cassidy, forever plagued by the credibility that eluded him, Efron's career now has a quality it has lacked for so long: It has become unpredictable.

 Teen idols who have crossed over

The career span of a dreamy pinup is often painfully short, but a handful have cheated fate and turned themselves from punch line to marquee player.  Here are a few hits (and near-misses):

Johnny Depp

Almost as soon as Depp pierced public consciousness as the young star of late '80s teen-cop drama "21 Jump Street," he made it clear he wasn't a going to be a garden-variety idol. He started talking in interviews about making a movie of Kerouac's "On the Road" and threatening to shave off his hair. By 1990 he was fleeing his prime-time trap for a starring role in John Waters' "Crybaby," which he described at the time as "the ultimate juvenile-delinquent musical comedy" -- soon to be followed by Tim Burton's "Edward Scissorhands," the first of many quirky movies he would choose on his way to becoming one of the world's most admired actors.

Justin Timberlake

From his early appearance on "Star Search" to his squeaky-clean image in 'N Sync, there was little to suggest towheaded Timberlake was anything more than harmless fantasy fodder. He and Britney were the reigning fairy tale couple -- but in 2003, they broke up and in one fell swoop, both young lovers tumbled into adulthood. Timberlake took up with the very grown-up Cameron Diaz, and his debut album catapulted him to superstardom. He became a regular Rolling Stone cover boy, made even more infamous for exposing Janet Jackson's nipple during the Super Bowl.  But he found respect and widespread critical acclaim with his adventurous album "FutureSex/LoveSound." Timberlake had pulled off the ultimate former teen-pinup feat: building up artistic credibility while keeping the fans panting.

Britney Spears

The beleagured pop star has zigzagged across the line of credibility so many times that it's hard to remember when she first arrived. La Spears was incubated in "The New Mickey Mouse Club," of course, and burst on to the pop scene with an album that had one bona fide megahit ("Baby One More Time") and a lot of cloying nonsense. She had all the trappings of a one-hit wonder, but Spears leveraged her time in the spotlight with a series of then-shocking magazine spreads, beginning with David LaChapelle's Rolling Stone cover in 1999, flaunting her sizzling teen bod while promising to keep her virginity tucked away in a heart-shaped box. It was all a bunch of calculated nonsense, of course, but it worked, along with all those perfect Max Martin pop confections, so that by the time she swapped saliva with Madonna on the MTV Video Music Awards in 2003, the homespun Louisiana teenybopper had transformed herself into the country's reigning pop princess. And then, other things happened. Maybe you heard.

Bobby Brown

Booted out of the '80s teen group New Edition for bad behavior, Bobby Brown could have easily been a footnote to the '80s boy band era -- and a minor one at that. His first solo attempt was largely ignored, but his 1988 smash album "Don't Be Cruel" was all swagger and sass, and the hit "My Prerogative" became an anthem for teen-idol rebellion when Britney Spears remade it in 2004. Brown became a blueprint for Spears in another way, as his music career soon became eclipsed by the hot mess of his tumultuous reality-show life.

Mark Wahlberg

A life of crime or life in a boy band seemed to be the two options facing Mark Wahlberg at the age of 13. He switched off between the two, spending a short stint in his brother Donnie's band New Kids on the Block and another in jail before finding fame as Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch. The party jam "Good Vibrations" was a massive hit, as was the video in which Wahlberg flexed his bare, extremely buff chest. His career as a Calvin Klein underwear model eventually overshadowed his music, and a dead-end future as a hunky has-been was looming. But in 1993, Wahlberg got a part in a movie, which led to a string of strong performances in movies like "The Basketball Diaries" and "Boogie Nights." Nowadays, Wahlberg not only acts (nabbing an Oscar nomination for "The Departed" in 2006) but he's also a Hollywood exec, producing the HBO series "Entourage" (loosely based on his own experiences) and "In Treatment" -- about as impressive an outcome as a pretty boy teen idol could imagine.

Miley Cyrus

Last April, tween superstar Miley Cyrus, aka Hannah Montana, tried her hand at a different kind of girl power: posing for a racy Annie Leibovitz portrait (just as David Cassidy had once done), draped in nothing but a bedsheet for the cover of Vanity Fair. What was presumably meant to signal a break from the goofy girldom of her Disney career prompted a ferocious backlash among parents and Disney itself, panicked that it might be losing its prized pony. A contagion of apologies and hand-wringing trend pieces later, the moment still stands as a transition for Cyrus, who managed to catapult herself into the national conversation, though she's back in line now for the most part, starring in April in another soft-focus "Hannah Montana" film. More moments of teen rebellion inevitably await.

 David Cassidy

OK, so David Cassidy never exactly crossed over to mainstream credibility. But it's not like he didn't try. Before he was cast as Keith Partridge in 1970, Cassidy had dreams of being a serious actor and musician -- but his massive TV superstardom derailed his plans and left him with a trail of screaming girls and a zillion lunchboxes bearing his image. ''I was playing a part on television, and that became the David Cassidy story. But underneath, there was this guy who was dying to do 'Purple Haze,''' he once told Entertainment Weekly. He desperately tried to shred his image by posing for a nude Annie Leibovitz Rolling Stone cover, his pubic hair on show, and dissing "The Partridge Family," but to no avail. Cassidy didn't find a place for himself until 1983, when he took the lead role on Broadway in "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat," a musical that has become a refuge for many former teen idols (Donny Osmond, Andy Gibb, Michael Damian and Leif Garrett among them) seeking salvation.

-- Joy Press and Sarah Hepola 

 

Girls on Miley Cyrus: She's a slut

Teenagers shame the Disney star for her controversial Vanity Fair shoot.

There comes word today of what teenage girls really think about Miley Cyrus after the scandal over her bedsheet photo shoot: They say she's a "slut" and "whore." In today's New York Times, reporter Susan Dominus talks with a handful of New York City girls about the controversial Vanity Fair photos. The teenagers -- many wearing skimpy skirts, cleavage-framing dresses and tight baby tees, and painted with glitter and Barbie-esque blush -- describe Cyrus using words usually reserved for tagging the locker of the girl rumored to have slept with half the high school football team. Dominus frames their response perfectly:

Dressing sexy, as she and so many of her classmates do, was one thing. Dressing in bedding, seemingly otherwise unclothed, was apparently quite another: contemptible, an actual evocation of sex itself. It's a paradigm about this generation of teenage girls that's perplexing to anyone who's aged out of it: They exude sexuality, even as they've internalized a language of shame and anger around it, a language that makes anyone who crosses some ever finer line of appropriate behavior a slut or a whore.

So how about those Miley Cyrus photos?

Outrage and finger-wagging follow the semi-topless photos of the "Hannah Montana" star.

The Internet is abuzz today with news that apple-cheeked Hannah Montana is "embarrassed about" a semi-topless Annie Leibovitz photo that appears in the upcoming Vanity Fair. The cover of the New York Post screams, "Miley's Shame!" When I saw the headline this morning on the subway, my heart sort of sank. Another good one lost to bottle service and TMZ. What had little Hannah done?

Then I saw the photos. Huh. Am I supposed to be outraged? I'm not. You can see more skin at a prom. I too cringe at the way girls are sexualized earlier these days -- and I've been known to throw fits about those sleazy American Apparel ads -- but I actually tend to agree with Leibovitz, who said in a statement that it's "a simple, classic portrait, shot with very little makeup."

But outrage is certainly out there for the taking right now. You can't get much more G-rated (or popular) than Hannah Montana, and parents are busy finger-wagging for the way she has failed her fans. Gawker rails on Leibovitz for being a controversy-baiting hack (which she kind of is): "We're hardly the type to play scolds for risque media attention-getting stunts," it writes. "But there is such a thing as a bright line that you simply don't cross."

But as far as I can see, the bigger problem is the other photos of Miley Cyrus, ones that surfaced last week. Now those aren't simple or classic. As one friend recently theorized, Cyrus may be backpedaling on the Vanity Fair shoot just to deflect attention from being another stupid teen with a cellphone camera.

Tween bees

First "High School Musical," now "Hannah Montana." Are preteen girls staging a complete cultural coup? Totally!

The tweens have inherited the earth. Their dominion was sealed early this month, when the 3-D "Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert" debuted as the No. 1 film in the country. Initially intended as a limited-run cinematic bone for the legions who couldn't obtain and/or afford tickets to the adolescent singer's sold-out national tour, the movie is now scheduled to roll out in wider, manifest destiny-level release. Meanwhile, the "Hannah Montana 2" album that debuted at the apex of the Billboard chart last summer still maintains a vise-like grip on the top 10, a few slots down from the new "Hannah Montana 2 Non-Stop Dance Party." You can keep your "Lost" and your "In Rainbows" desirable 18-35-year-old demographic. American pop culture as we know it belongs to my 8-year-old daughter, Lucy, and her preteen posse.

Girls have always been a formidable niche, the force that made a superstar of Barbie and propelled generations of cute boy bands to fame far beyond their talents. But on Jan. 20, 2006, their coup began in earnest. That's the night "High School Musical" premiered on the Disney Channel. More than 7.5 million viewers tuned in to watch it, a ratings record for the network. So Disney aired it again, and again, and again -- to escalating ratings. The soundtrack became the top-selling album of 2006. The revolution was televised, and the little girls won it.

In the ensuing two years, the tween machine has only grown bigger. Last summer's "HSM" sequel became the highest-rated cable broadcast in history, begetting a tour, an ice show, another forthcoming sequel and an unholy amount of Zac Efron-festooned merchandise. In the wake of its success, kid-centric music acts like the Jonas Brothers, the Cheetah Girls, and Aly & AJ have enjoyed massive album sales. The American Girl and Bratz dolls have spawned movies. But out of the smoldering, grape lip gloss-scented crater that "High School Musical" created, something even bigger emerged.

The 15-year-old daughter of mullet-prone, achy-breaky one-hit-wonder Billy Ray Cyrus, Miley Cyrus is the star of the Disney's Channel's juggernaut original series "Hannah Montana." The premise of the show, which debuted just two months after "High School Musical," is as old and as brilliant as the Superman myth itself: Semi-dorky high schooler Miley Stewart leads a double life as the eponymous platinum-tressed, platinum-selling pop idol. Her secret identity known to a sitcom-stock few (including her dad, played by her dad), young Miley has, as she sings in the show's earwormy theme song and tour of the same name, the best of both worlds. If only it were that easy for the rest of us.

My household is, by virtue of choice and economy, not particularly indulgent. We don't have cable. We don't have the space or inclination for a panoply of stuff. My two daughters hear the word "no" on a near constant basis. It's my job to protect them from turning into pint-size shills, to raise them to be thoughtful consumers. I am as skeptical and scared of the marketing deluge aimed at my children as the next parent.

I am also as susceptible to it, subscribing to the homeopathic attitude that a little bit of everything, in small doses, is probably healthy. So when, last summer, Lucy started coming home from day camp bellowing selections from the "High School Musical" and "Hannah Montana" songbooks, I checked them out via DVD. It wasn't long before the whole family had fallen for their respective charms, and both my firstborn and her preschooler sister were squealing for any Miley-centric thing they could get their hands on. I just wish Disney could put Hannah Montana's face on vegetables.

So while I wasn't ready to blow my kids' college funds on concert tickets this year, it was inevitable that I find myself with Lucy in the opening weekend throng for the Hannah Montana movie.

The film is in many ways a Disney princess tale in reverse -- glammed-up Hannah rules the stage for the first half of the show, then morphs into the far earthier, more approachable real girl Miley for the remainder. The jaded part of me knows it's because the Miley Cyrus brand has a longer potential shelf life than her teenybop alter ego. Another part, however, is OK with a stadium of girls getting their first inkling that there's more to life than being blond and shiny. And if a collective worship of Hannah is what makes my children and their friends feel unique, I'm glad the irony doesn't reach them yet. At least they have role models. Boys their age have their comic book heroes and their games and gear, but precious little in the way of human inspiration.

In Hannah Montana, Disney has created a girl-next-door icon and a heroine of moxie and talent. The shticky writing on the show may never rise to "30 Rock"-level cleverness, nor will the music ever make me forget Sleater-Kinney, but I'm not the audience. I can nevertheless recognize that the star herself has undeniable chops. Cyrus has a natural charisma, effortless comic timing, and the pipes to carry off her girl-power lyrics. She is, as Lucy attests, awesome, which is more than I can say for a whole lot of what the entertainment industry is dropping on adults lately.

Say what you will about the overcalculated, quasi-creepy way the Disney machine burrows into our kids' psyches, it's effective. Kids, to the delight of advertisers, are both tremendously receptive to persuasion and astonishingly persistent at nagging. And every day, inundated parents have to pick the hills they're going to die on. The tweens have taken over on an invasion financed by their moms and dads. If a half-hour of Miley karaoke buys some peace in which to cook dinner, or a Hannah purse is the go-to gift for a birthday party, I can begin to understand how Disney saw our collective exposed throat and leapt for it.

It's more than simple wearing down, though. We're often just so eager to make our kids happy, so grateful for entertainment that's innocent and encouraging and age appropriate. If merchandising is often excessive and usually downright cynical, parents' occasional optimistic trust in the things our children love is not. The appeal of Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus rides largely on its dualism -- the conceit of having a normal family life while successfully pursuing career passion. Though it's a notion that could make any overextended working mother laugh mirthlessly into her merlot, it's one my daughters are only just beginning to grasp. It's one I want them aspiring to as they grow up. I like to think we aging riot grrrls see a little of ourselves in the spirited, boundaries- and decibels-shattering Hannah/Miley, and, we hope, in our daughters. Talent and attitude and ambition can't be bought; they can't be absorbed from an image slapped on a pillowcase. They can, however, be cultivated.

Remember junior high and high school, when the unself-conscious weirdness of childhood gave way to all that adolescent awkwardness and self-doubt? Most adults I know sure do, because lingering inside all of us is a permanent vestige of that person we were typecast as then: the geek, the jock, the angry art chick. We cast a bittersweet glance at our tween girls, and know all that awaits just a few years from now for them. So if they're learning, through parental-patience-testing repeated plays of "Who Said," that "every girl has a choice," if they hear "Nobody's Perfect" enough to consider that it's OK to cut themselves a little slack, perhaps they'll have just a little more ammunition for the esteem-battering days to come. God knows I need to hear that message too. It's not the best of any world. But it's close enough.

Miley Cyrus in the news

Loading...

Currently in Salon